Upon Trust - Judgment Search Results

Kandla Port Trust Vs. Kandla Port Trust

Court: Supreme Court of India

Civil Application Nos.17403/2006 and 17404/2006. The learned Single Judge summarily dismissed both the special civil applications by relying upon an order passed by the Division Bench in Letters Patent Appeal No.104 of 2000, wherein it was observed:"... … in the container. There is no contract between the petitioner-appellant and the shipping company or the Kandla Port Trust. In absence of this, in our opinion, the learned Single Judge has rightly arrived at a conclusion that

Jyotiraditya Charitable Trust Vs. Registrar, Public Trust

Court: Madhya Pradesh

may think fit from the trustee or any person connected with a public trust; Provided that in entering upon any property belonging to the public trust the officer making the entry shall give reasonable notice to the

Press Trust of India Ltd. and anr. Vs. Press Trust of India Employees ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 2003(1)BomCR567; (2003)1BOMLR109; [2003(96)FLR565]; (2003)ILLJ709Bom; 2002(4)MhLj653

the Union and that he was transferred at the instance of the rival union viz., Federation of Press Trust of India Employees Union. By a resolution passed by the said Federation at an emergency meeting of the

Press Trust of India Employees Union and anr. Vs. Press Trust of India ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 2007(2)ALLMR259; 2007(1)BomCR682; (2007)2LLJ163Bom

J. 1. These proceedings are directed against an order passed by the Industrial Court on September 7, 2006 upon two revision applications, one by the employer and the second by the workman against an order passed by … who is the Second Petitioner before the Court was a senior Correspondent employed since 1986 with the Press Trust of India. On November 3, 1998 a communication was issued to him by the editor requiring the Second

Press Trust of India Employees Vs. Press Trust of India

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 119(2005)DLT266; (2005)IIILLJ22Del

Matched in: Parties Press Trust of India Employees Vs. Press Trust of India

Chennai Port Trust, Rep. by Its Chairman Vs. Chennai Port Trust Indust ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (2006)2MLJ310

only a smokescreen put up by the real employer to avoid its statutory liability. This case was relied upon by the appellant to show that for piercing the veil, a finding of fact is necessary and therefore, … and purport and not for the purpose of the Factories Act alone.2. The workers of the Chennai Port Trust enjoy the facility of a canteen which is run by the Chennai Port Trust Industrial Employees' Co-operative Canteen

Amritsar Improvement Trust Amritsar Vs. Amritsar Improvement Trust Amr ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR No.3534 of 2013. Date of Decision:29. 5.2013 Amritsar Improvement Trust Amritsar .... Petitioner Versus The State of Punjab and others .... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAWAB SINGH

Press Trust of India, Employees' Union and Anr. Vs. Press Trust of Ind ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: [1999(81)FLR349]; (2000)IIILLJ60Bom

is averred in the complaint that on May 14, 1998 the respondents 1 to 3 issued letter calling upon the General Secretary of the union to give explanation regarding the demonstration by 5 P.M. on May 15,

Amritsar Diocesan Trust Association (Regd.) Vs. Amritsar Diocesan Trus ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Reported in: (1998)120PLR589

reads as under:-'10(2) Court may strike or add parties:-The Court may at any stage of the proceedings, either upon or without the application of either party, and on such terms as may appear to the Court to … V.S. Aggarwal, J.1. Amritsar Diocesen Trust Association (Regd.) has filed the present revision petition directed against the order passed by the learned Civil Judge

Estate and Trust Agencies (1927) Ltd. Vs. Singapore Improvement Trust

Court: Privy Council

this section to the Governor in Council shall be accompanied by : (a) the reports, statements or matters upon which the Board acted: (b) such objections as have been made to the declaration; (c) any evidence which … which had been directed to issue by the trial Judge was set aside. The appellants, the Estate and Trust Agencies (1927) Limited are the owners of a house known as Municipal No. 543, North Bridge Road, Singapore.