The Kerala Public Men S Corruption Investigations And Inquiries Amendment Act 1992 - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: the kerala public men s corruption investigations and inquiries amendment act 1992 Court: gujarat Page 1 of about 302 results (1.385 seconds)Parmar Dipubhai B. and 10 ors. Vs. Registraqr of Co-operative Societie ...
Court : Gujarat
Reported in : (2006)2GLR1615
rule 176 and in the absence of report of the kerala public men s corruption investigation and enquiries commission being made 2 is not a private establishment but it is a public body and cannot behave in this manner they also submitted committee of a society falling in any of the categories mentioned in sub section 1 of section 74c shall not be the so called report of the kerala public men s corruption investigation and inquiries commission who had directed to a detailed absence of report of the kerala public men s corruption investigation and enquiries commission being made available to the bank or report of the kerala public men s corruption investigation and inquiries commission who had directed to a detailed inquiry and on refuse to register society and the bye laws and every amendment of such bye laws 2 to amalgamate divide or re prescribed has been defined in section 2 15 of the act as prescribed by rules so the act contemplated rules laying
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTShital C. Joshi Vs. Gujarat State Road Transport Corporation
Court : Gujarat
Reported in : (2003)4GLR674
176 and in the absence of the report of the kerala public men s corruption investigation and enquiries commission being made action of the corporation is fully justified in the larger public interest and therefore also this petition is not required to into consideration the so called report of the kerala public men s corruption investigation and enquiries commission who had directed for the corporation thakore as well as the letter of anti corruption bureau for doing the needful and to send the report of the report of the kerala public men s corruption investigation and enquiries commission being made available to the bank or of this case no fault can be found with the action of the railway authorities in calling upon 35 empanelled candidates neuro sciences vs dr k kalyana raman ors reported in 1992 ii llj 616 in which on page 617 at para
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSatvirsinh Abhayram Yadav. Vs. State of Gujarat.
Court : Gujarat
d maintain law and order and should cooperate with the investigating officers e mark his presence before concerned police station on the prosecution witnesses or complainant in any manner c not act in any manner injurious to the interest of the prosecution
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAjaysinh Pravinsinh Vadher. Vs. State of Gujarat.
Court : Gujarat
and also considering the role attributed to him by the investigating agency and when a co accused with somewhat similar allegations is filed u s 54 1 of the land acquisition act against the judgment and award dated 08 10 2010 passed
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTNareshwan Prahladwan Goswami. Vs. State of Gujarat.
Court : Gujarat
have also perused the nature of evidence collected by the investigating agency since the trial is yet to be conducted it advantage of his liberty or abuse his liberty 2 not act in a manner injurious to the interest of the prosecution
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRich Paints Ltd. Vs. Vadodara Stock Exchange Ltd. and ors.
Court : Gujarat
Reported in : [1998]92CompCas282(Guj)
application money pursuant to minimum subscription of shares offered to public not paid to and received by company as required by 69 4 73 73 3 and 73 3a of companies act 1956 securities contracts regulation act 1956 securities and exchange board regulation act 1956 securities and exchange board of india act 1992 and article 226 of constitution of india order passed by
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTPadmavati Jaykrishna Trust and anr. Vs. Commissioner of Wealth-tax, Gu ...
Court : Gujarat
Reported in : [1966]61ITR66(Guj)
instrument the trustees were to perform pujas of the deities mentioned therein and the cost thereof was to be defrayed from tax act 1957 and section 21 1 of wealth tax amendment act 1959 question arose whether assessment should be made under in the case of assets chargeable to tax launder this act which are held amongst other persons by a trustee appointed
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTLaboni Developers Vs. Appropriate Authority and ors.
Court : Gujarat
Reported in : (1996)130CTR(Guj)512; [1996]219ITR284(Guj)
sip 1 on the contrary the puc is facing 32 public toilets used by 700 members of 150 families residing in not rebutted and given the finding that the apparent consideration mentioned in the agreement was understated with a view to evade of the it act 1961 hereinafter referred to as the act for brevity and prays for an order directing the appropriate
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTNavnitlal Gordhandas and ors. Vs. Keshavlal Maganlal and anr.
Court : Gujarat
Reported in : AIR1964Guj233; (1964)0GLR315
rulein jurisprudence that one who reads a legal document whether public or private should not beprompt to ascribe to its language of the disputed land for the purposes of the sections mentioned in clause b of section 2 8 if however the in excess of the rent lawfully due but after the amendments he would not have any such protection for he would it stood after the amendments effected in it by bombay act xiii of 1956 the entire case was argued before us
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCgt Vs. Gautam Sarabhai Ltd.
Court : Gujarat
Reported in : [2003]132TAXMAN315(Guj)
1 c of the act it was necessary for the department to show that the agreement in question was not bona assessee for purchasing the reversionary rights it is also nowhere mentioned in the agreement that the assessee company was entitled to gifts to include certain transfers for the purposes of this act c where there is a release discharge surrender forfeiture or
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT