Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: tezpur university act 1993 section 11 the chancellor Court: chennai Page 8 of about 101 results (0.108 seconds)

Lilly Bai Vs. Chinna Thai and ors.

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (1996)1MLJ131

..... for consideration in that case was, whether the dismissal of a principal of that college without the prior approval of the vice-chancellor as required by the university act was void, and whether any relief could be granted to the principal. while deciding that case, their lordships held as follows:a contract of personal service ..... and also reiterating the principles enunciated in dhulabhai v. state of m.p. : [1968]3scr662 and also shiv kumar chadhu v. municipal corporation of delhi : [1993]3scr522 , their lordships held thus:.learned counsel contended that if a writ petition is maintainable without filing the second appeal provided by rule 20, a suit is equally ..... dhulabhai's case : [1968]3scr662 .39. a recent decision of the apex court reported in d.r. chawla and ors. v. municipal corporation of delhi : [1993]3scr522 , the question that came up for consideration was, whether the orders of the municipality regarding demolition of building can be questioned in a civil court. while considering .....

M/S.Rajam Industries (P) Ltd., Vs. the Deputy Commercial Tax Officer, ...

Court : Chennai

..... said so both in the counter-affidavit as also in its purported show-cause notice.10. the said principle has been followed by this court in v.c., banaras hindu university v. shrikant[(2006) 11 scc 42], stating: (scc p.60, paras 48-49)48.the vice-chancellor appears to have made up his mind to impose the punishment ..... occasions.thus, the first respondent department satisfied with the materials available and obtained during investigation that its initial burden has been discharged as per section 11a of the central excise act, 1944 by exercising the term, extended period.44. ultimately, in paragraph-14 of the impugned show-cause notice, when the first respondent has arrived at a contravention of ..... 2807 of cet.(d) why duty of rs.16,68,391/- payable on spent acide for the period june, 1993 to march 2001 as detailed in annexure-d should not be demanded under proviso to section 11a(1) of the central excise act, 1944;(e) a penalty should not be imposed on them separately under rule 9(2), 52a(8), 173q .....

J. Sampath Kumar Vs. Bar Council of India Represented by Its Secretary ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (1994)2MLJ651

..... p. no. 91 of 1994; the petitioner claims to be a post-graduate in commerce of sri venkateshwara university and a law graduate of the university of bangalore having acquired the l.lb. degree in the year 1993 from the university of bangalore. he claims to be fully qualified to be enrolled as an advocate and therefore, obtained the ..... , though otherwise qualified for being enrolled merely on the ground of having reached a particular maximum age limit prescribed as rules. similarly section 24(a) of the act stipulates the disqualifying factors, which stand in the way of anyone claiming to be admitted as an advocate on a state roll. the parliament in its wisdom, ..... quality and reputation of the bar, is merely a matter of surmise, with no credible or legitimate basis for such assumptions, section 24(a) of the act, as amended in 1993, while introducing clause (c) to sub-section (1) takes sufficient care of persons guilty of misconduct getting enrolled as members of the profession and the legistial .....

K. Murugan and Others Vs. Dr. V.K. Marimuthu and Others

Court : Chennai Madurai

..... from this world and cannot, therefore, assist the court enquiring into its genuineness in any manner. (xii) in ramalakshmi alias ranjitham vs. janaki and others reported in 1993 (1) mlj 617, this court held as follows: 3. i do not think that the order of the trial court can be interfered with. when the counsel ..... of tamilnadu as additional evidence. in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the appellant has stated that since p.w.4 had violated the provisions of notaries act, 1952 and unlawfully taken part in the execution of impugned will dated 13.03.2005, he lodged a complaint to the secretary, law (administration) department, government of ..... does not ordinarily differ from that of proof of any other document except as to the special requirement of attestation prescribed by section 63 of the indian succession act. the onus of proof rests squarely on the person propounding a will and in the absence of any suspicious circumstances surrounding its execution, the proof of .....

Maharaja of Kolhapur Vs. S. Sundaram Ayyar and 15 ors.

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (1925)ILR68Mad1

..... ), that the rajputs have formed marriage connexions even with koli and bhil chiefs who have not the least pretensions to kshatriya blood ; and that it is the universal practice among the lower castes, when they wish to rise in the social scale, to imitate the higher by prohibiting widow marriage, wearing the sacred thread, and ..... interprets the consequence of this dependance in a different way, and the conclusion of the leading commentators of the bombay school is that, adoption being a meritorious act, express permission is not necessary. i may in this connexion refer to the translations of the passages in viramitrodaya arid the kaustubha by mandlik in pages 463 to ..... other south indian deities, they preserved many of their own habits, like sunmuk, which are peculiar to the mahrattas. there is evidence that the telugu purohit was acting under the supervision of the western purohit named bhat goswami (see the evidence of d.w. 91). the mere employment of local priests under the supervision of .....

Terminated Full Time Temporary Lic Employees Welfare Association Vs. S ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (1993)ILLJ1030Mad; (1992)IIMLJ573

..... 1961)illj540sc , the supreme court held that in cases of conflict between a specific provision and a general provision, the former prevails over the latter. that universal rule has no hearing in this case. in pratap singh v. manmohan dey : [1966]3scr663 , the court held that a general later law does not ..... the rendering ineffective of judgments or orders of competent courts and tribunals by changing their basis by legislative enactment is a well known pattern of all validating acts. such validating legislation which removes the causes for ineffectiveness or invalidity of actions or proceedings is not an encroachment on judicial power. 22. hari singh ..... the principle of re-employment of retrenched temporary employees in the explanation appended thereto and thereby the principles underlying sec. 25h of the industrial disputes act and inasmuch as regulation 8 sought to curtail the same, it was arbitrary and therefore, unconstitutional. regulation 12 referred to by learned counsel provides .....

Areva T and D India Ltd. Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax and ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (2008)220CTR(Mad)156; [2009]177TAXMAN192(Mad)

..... (1987)iillj536sc , s.k. dutta, ito v. lawarence singh , cit v. b.c. srinivasa setty : [1981]128itr294(sc) and deepak sibak v. punjab university : [1989]1scr689 to support their claim.6. learned counsel appearing for the respondents filed counter and denied the allegations and vehemently contended that the notification issued under section ..... quashed. learned counsel for the petitioners relied on number of judgments of the supreme court in cit v. british paints india ltd. (1991) 91 ctr (sc) 108 : 1993 supp. (1) scc 55, k.t. moopil nair v. state of kerala : [1961]3scr77 , state of andhra pradesh v. nallaraja reddy : [1967]3scr28 , ..... by a common judgment.3. the brief facts are as follows:writ petn. no. 1524 of 2007:the petitioner is a company incorporated under the companies act, 1956, engaged in the business of transmission and distribution including manufacturing relays, circuit breakers, power transformers, distribution transformers and switchgear transmission and distribution business ( .....

Vasantha R. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (2001)IILLJ843Mad

..... not really arise between persons governed by different conditions and different sets of circumstances. the principle of equality does not mean that every law must have universal application for all persons who are not by nature, attainment or circumstances in the same position and the varying needs of different classes of persons require ..... it would also include equal opportunities. an employer is bound by the statutory provisions of the said act to treat both sexes equally.95. for the past two decades and over, various state governments, central government, universities, and public corporations are all trying to reverse the effects of past discrimination which was based on ..... women was ratified by the united nations organisation on december 18, 1979 and the government of india had ratified as an active participant on june 19, 1993. it has been reiterated that the discrimination against women violates the principle of equality, of rights as well as respect for human dignity. article 1 of .....

D. Jeyabalan Vs. the Registrar, Madurai Kamaraj University

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (1992)1MLJ7

..... it is well-settled now that any order passed administratively also should contain reasons. hence, the order is set aside and the matter is remitted back to the respondent/university to pass a fresh order on merits according to law, if necessary after giving an opportunity to the petitioner, on or before 30.11.1991. the writ petition is ..... counsel for the petitioner will not apply to the facts of this case.6. after going through the relevant statutes pointed out by the learned counsel for the respondent/ university, i am of the view that the judgment reported in sampath's case 1988 w.l.r. 247, cited supra, will not apply to the facts of the case ..... that the petitioner is not entitled to get himself registered.7. in this case, as already extracted above, there is already a prohibition in the laws of the university under chapter xxviii (statute 17),that each fellow shall be a full-time research worker while holding the fellowship shall not accept other remunerative work. however, it is not .....

G. Sundarrajan Vs. the Union of India Rep. by the Secretary to Governm ...

Court : Chennai

..... some postgraduate students in addition to cardiology. similarly, appellant 2 had one year's experience as post-doctoral teaching fellow in the department of medicine, state university of new york, buffalo, one year's teaching experience as lecturer while posted as a pool officer and 15 months' teaching experience as post-doctoral research ..... per rule 5(3)(a) of the environment (protection) rules, 1986. in fact, the government has called for objections even before, namely on 28.1.1993, by making publication and thereafter made the environmental impact assessment notification, 1994 directing that any expansion or modernization of any activity (if pollution load is to exceed the ..... the basis of expert advice and the act makes provision for obtaining such advice through the board and the dcc." 104. in the absence of any allegation of mala fide, the courts should be slow in interfering in respect of appointments made by the universities, who are the academic bodies, and therefore in respect of .....