Court : Chennai
Reported in : AIR1994Mad2
..... by his caste name, his greatness is denigrated. thus, the learned counsel contends that g.o. ms. no. 366, revenue department, dated 11-5-1993 naming the district with head-quarters at villupuram as villupuram ramaswami padayachiar district is against the provisions of the constitution, against secularism and against national unity and ..... of management of the then tamil nadu g.d. naidu agricultural university recommended to change the name of university as tamil nadu agricultural university and since almost all agricultural universities in india have been named after the state, it was renamed as tamil nadu agricultural university. thus, i am of the view, that the inauguration of ..... . the allegation of the petitioners that giving such a name as 'pudayachi' to the new district amounts to perpetuating caste and untouchability and such an act would be against the constitution and tends to violate the fundamental rights enshrined in articles 14 and 17 of the constitution, in my opinion, is not .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chennai
Reported in : [2005]124CompCas399(Mad); (2005)6CompLJ490(Mad); 2005(1)CTC249; (2005)1MLJ269; [2005]60SCL604(Mad)
..... the context, subject-matter and object of the statutory provision in question in determining whether the same is mandatory or directory. according to their lordships, no universal principle of law could be laid in that behalf as to whether a particular provision or enactment shall be considered mandatory or directory and it is the duty ..... 1965- 66 and sub-section (1-a), (1-b), (1-c) and (1-d) were introduced for the first time by the companies (amendment) act, 1965 [act 31/1965]. the learned judge has observed that the supreme court was interpreting the provisions of section 108 as it stood at the time of the impugned transaction therein ..... 6. after taking us through the company petition, counter, rejoinder, the details regarding civil suits, impugned order of the company law board and relevant provisions of the companies act, mr. a. alagiriswamy, learned senior counsel for the investors, and mr. p.h. aravindh pandian, learned counsel for the company, have raised the following contentions:(i) .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chennai
Reported in : (1992)1MLJ544
..... this court seeking reliefs as he did in the present writ petition. he would place reliance on a pronouncement of a bench of this court in association of university teachers v. state of tamil nadu and anr. : (1991)iillj31mad , to say that constitutional issues and constitutional validity of a statute or provision of the ..... we cannot say that we are called upon to decide the question for academic purposes only. by the introduction of chapter iii-a into the act by the amendment act provisions for appointment of special officer in certain cases get introduced and certainly the petitioner need not await enforcement of the said provisions against it, ..... prayed that this honourable court may be pleased to issue a writ of declaration, declaring the tamil nadu recognised private schools (regulation) and private colleges (regulation) amendment act, 1982 (48 of 1982) as ultra vires and unconstitutional in so far as the petitioners herein are concerned, and pass such further or other order or orders .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chennai
Reported in : AIR1997Mad283
..... no objection' from the state government for granting affiliation is not justified, having regard to the provisions contained in the madras university act and the statutes framed thereunder (hereinafter referred to as 'the act' and 'the statutes'). it is only the state government and the bar council of tamil nadu, as already pointed ..... be obtained before seeking or obtaining affiliation from the university.6. the preamble to the madras university act specifically provides that it is intended to re-organise the university of madras with aview to establishing a leaching and affiliating university at madras while enabling the university to continue to exercise due control over the quality ..... to the college.8. learned government pleader placed reliance on the decisions of the supreme court in unni krishnan, j. p. v. state of a.p., : [1993]1scr594 ; state of tamil nadu v. adhiyaman educational research institute, : (1995)4scc104 and state of maharashtra v. manobhai pragati vashi 1995 (6) jt 119 : .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chennai
Reported in : (2007)4MLJ146
..... the report of such committee as void or without jurisdiction.18. so far as the action under the capitation fee act, 1992 is concerned, the university has not taken any decision under the act nor passed any order. the resolution dated 25th oct., 1993 is a mere suggestion/recommendation to the state government to take action in accordance with law, which is always open ..... , not only to the university, but to any aggrieved person, including student(s)/parents or their guardian, who can bring the illegality to the notice of .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chennai
Reported in : (2008)2MLJ593
..... by parliament under entry 66 of list i. it must be assumed that parliament was aware of the provisions of the delhi university act when it enacted the ugc act, particularly because the power to enact legislation concerning the delhi university lay with parliament under entry 63 of list i....20. the ambit of entry 66 has already been the subject of the ..... were beyond the competence of the u.g.c. and that they were only directory and not mandatory. since delhi university traced its establishment to entry 63 of list i of the vii schedule to the constitution and the delhi university act was an 'existing law' for the purposes of the constitution, it was contended that the regulations issued in exercise ..... will have mandatory force. regulations have been framed with reference to clauses (fa), (fb) and (fc) (which have been introduced by the amendment act of 1993 w.e.f. 27.08.1992) and clauses (j), (k) and (l) of section 33.in st. johns teachers training institute v. regional director, n.c.t.e. air .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chennai
Reported in : (2009)5MLJ468
..... 3(c); 3(k); 3(1); 3(6); 12(3)(b); 27, 28-30(a); 30(b); 30(e) and 31 of icfai university act, 2003 (act no. 16/2003 dehradun).31. that apart, the said respondents have issued misleading advertisements and notifications inviting applications for admission without furnishing the material particulars such as ..... the areas of applied finance management, general management, applied sciences and technology in the state of uttaranchal. the university was included in the list of universities under section 2(f) of the ugc act. the icfai university act, 2003, clearly stipulates that the headquarters shall be at dehradun and it may have constituent colleges, regional ..... prasarak mandal v. state of maharashtra : air2000bom437 :in this case, the bombay high court followed the judgment of the supreme court in unnikrishnan's case : [1993]1scr594 , as follows:the private educational institutions merely supplement the effort of the state in educating the people, as explained above. it is not an independent .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chennai
Reported in : 1998(3)CTC236; (2001)8SCC676; AIR2001SC2861
..... reply took us through some provisions of (the) all-india institute of medical sciences act, 1956, (the indian) medical council act, 1956, (the) indian medicine central council act, 1970 and (the) national council for teacher education act, 1993 to state that in these acts, there are specific provisions so as to include university in the matter of seeking prior approval or permission of the council in the ..... . the argument that in the absence of specific provision in the act so as to include university also as coming within the meaning of 'technical institution', unlike in other acts such as (the) all india institute of medical sciences act, 1956, (the) indian medicine central council act, 1970 and the national council for teacher education act, 1993, it should be held that the regulations go beyond the .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chennai
Reported in : (1999)IIILLJ640Mad
..... is not in dispute that the research station was formerly run by the state government, and that it was handed over to university, after the university, namely, the tamil nadu agricultural university act, 1971. the principal work done in the research station is research in agriculture that, the crops grown on the land of ..... fact that the affairs of the university are conducted by a board, has held that the university being an autonomous body, it is not an establishment under the state government.9. the tamil nadu agricultural university act was enacted with the object of providing for the establishment of the university, for the development of agriculture, ..... the board are set out in section 19. it has total control over the finances and administration of the university.14. section 26 of the act deals with agricultural research organisation. the university is required to establish an agricultural research organisation for doing basic research on problems primarily relating to agriculture, and .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chennai
Reported in : (2001)3MLJ523
..... suit and the interest is the interest of the person who was the party to the suit,'38. in a recent decision reported in dhurandhar prasad singh v. jai prakash university and ors., 2001 (5) supreme 278, it has been held that,'in a case of devolution of interest during the pendency of a suit was postulated under order 22 ..... its absence even the beneficiaries could not get any relief.7. in support of his various contentions, the learned senior counsel referred to the provisions of the trusts act, the stamp act and the registration act. he relied on the following decisions: (1) syed shafee and anr. v. s.asmath basha and anr. , ranjit kumar ghosh and anr. v. sirish ..... two months time to the revision petitioner to vacate. this was confirmed in the appeal r.c.a. no.148 of 1990 filed by the revision petitioner on 1.4.1993 by the learned appellate authority, viz., the subordinate judge, coimbatore. it is as against this, the present revision has been filed.6. mr. shanmugavel, learned senior counsel .....
Tag this Judgment!