Court : Chennai Madurai
..... the respondents and perused the materials placed before this court. 5. the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that as per section 12(5) of the madurai kamaraj university act 1965, the first respondent is under the statutory obligation to give effect to the resolution/orders/approved of the syndicate of madurai kamaraj ..... university and as per the section 20 and 20(7) of madurai kamaraj university act 1965, the syndicate body is the executive body and executive power to administer the university is vested with it and it has power to appoint and promote assistant librarian at dr. ..... 19.09.1991 vide order dated 18.09.1991 issued by the second respondent, the registrar of madurai kamaraj university. at the time of appointment, she had qualified b.sc., b.l.i.sc., after that she qualified m.a., in the year 1993, m.l.i.s., in the year 1995, m.phil, in the year 2004 and on 27 .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chennai Madurai
..... is no clause as to the renewal of memorandum of understanding once in four years and the same is against the ingredients of tamilnadu agricultural university act 1971 and statutes of the tamilnadu agricultural university and its regulations. 2.3. as a matter of fact, a due reply was sent by the college relating to the ownership of ..... or any other fee from the newly admitted candidates. inasmuch as the same is not in consonance with the tamilnadu agricultural university act 1971, besides, the agreement entered between the fifth respondent/tamil nadu agricultural university, coimbatore and the petitioner herein, a writ petition in w.p.(md)no.10807 of 2015 was preferred before the madurai ..... counsel for the respondents 3 to 5 cites a decision of the hon'ble supreme court in st.jons teachers training institute, madurai vs. state of tamil nadureported in 1993 (3) scc. 595, wherein at special page no.605, at paragraph no.14, it is observed as follows:- mr. shanti bhushan appearing in civil appeals .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chennai Madurai
..... from this world and cannot, therefore, assist the court enquiring into its genuineness in any manner. (xii) in ramalakshmi alias ranjitham vs. janaki and others reported in 1993 (1) mlj 617, this court held as follows: 3. i do not think that the order of the trial court can be interfered with. when the counsel ..... of tamilnadu as additional evidence. in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the appellant has stated that since p.w.4 had violated the provisions of notaries act, 1952 and unlawfully taken part in the execution of impugned will dated 13.03.2005, he lodged a complaint to the secretary, law (administration) department, government of ..... does not ordinarily differ from that of proof of any other document except as to the special requirement of attestation prescribed by section 63 of the indian succession act. the onus of proof rests squarely on the person propounding a will and in the absence of any suspicious circumstances surrounding its execution, the proof of .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chennai Madurai
..... till 1991 and she did her doctor of medicine (m.d., degree) in obstetrics and gynecology, in the year 1988-1990 at madurai medical college and passed with university rank in the year 1990 and thereafter, continued as medical officer at poolathur primary health centre, kodaikkanal, dindigul district and from june 1990 to december 1990, she ..... while holding the post of the director of medical education, in terms of para 2 of g.o. (ms)no.368, personnel and administrative reforms department, dated 18.10.1993, sent a proposal containing the names of the third respondent, the appellant/writ petitioner, dr. al. meenakshi sundaram and dr. a. edwin joe and also pointed out ..... petitioner may be positively considered as she will be the senior most medical officer in the civil medical list and the first respondent need not be influenced by the act of the appellant/writ petitioner in filing the writ petition as well as this writ appeal as she has exercised her legal and constitutional right. 9. per .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chennai Madurai
..... a mode of reasoning assumes that the law is necessarily a logical code, whereas every lawyer must acknowledge that the law is not always logical at all. 16. in bhavnagar university v.pali tana sugar mills pvt. ltd., air 2003 sc 511: (2003) 2 scc 111, this court observed: it is well settled that a little difference in ..... that it is showing discourtesy to the court as held by this court in the case law in ravikaran singh .vs. state of uttar pradesh and others reported in 1993(21)alr 197". this court considered this aspect and has observed as follows in para 5 of the judgment which is being reproduced "in the counter affidavit which ..... coimbatore to appear and conduct the said industrial dispute. admittedly, the advocate's clerk has filed the affidavit. 21. as per section 2(7) of the advocates' welfare fund act, 2001, "vakalatnama" includes memorandum of appearance or any other document by which an advocate is empowered to appear or plead before any court, tribunal or other authority. 22.as .....
Tag this Judgment!