Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: tezpur university act 1993 section 11 the chancellor Court: chennai Page 2 of about 101 results (0.154 seconds)

C. Parthiban and Selvi D. Akila Vs. Dr. K. Meena Convenor, Vice-chance ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (2007)3MLJ492

..... enquiry submitted a report which disclosed a prima facie case against the 4th respondent. based on the report, the university initiated disciplinary proceedings against the 4th respondent.7. the employees of the university including the teaching staff are governed by the bharathidasan university act and rules and statutes made thereunder. disciplinary proceedings against them are to be conducted according to the statutes of the ..... a teacher resulting in sexual harassment of the girl students involving misconduct or moral turpitude, a resolution proposing special summary procedure was passed and published by notification dated 23.12.1993, after due approval by the executives of the respondent-samiti. the minister of human resources and development, government of india is its chairman. the notification postulates dispensation of regular enquiry .....

Sadakathullah Appa College, Represented by Its Secretary, T.E.S. Fathu ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : 2004(1)CTC1; (2004)1MLJ374

..... technical education in the country at all levels. sub-clause (g) empowers the council to evolve suitable performance appraisal systems for technical institutions and universities imparting technical education incorporating norms and mechanisms for enforcing accountability. sub-clause (i) enables the council to lay down norms and standards for the courses ..... to the very clear area of authority of the council constituted under the act, which vests the exclusive power of regulating technical education in the country in the council constituted under the act. the power exercised by the university in respect of affiliated colleges is subordinate to the power exercisable by the ..... of technical institutions. the council appears to have been energised to act in this field only after the supreme court rendered judgment in march 1994 in the case of unnikrishnan v. state of andhra pradesh, : [1993]1scr594 . between september 1993 and october 1994 the aicte approved a number of engineering colleges .....

M. Thanikachalam and Others Vs. Maduranthakam Agricultural Producers C ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : 2000(4)CTC556; (2001)ILLJ285Mad

..... but is merely governed by the statutory provisions it cannot be said to be a statutory body. therefore, merely because the executive committee followed certain statutory provisions of the university act or statutes it cannot be deemed a statutory body'.50. in co-operative central bank ltd., and others etc., v. additional industrial tribunal, andhra pradesh, hyderabad and ..... no writ will lie, and that the terms of settlement cannot be enforced by filing writ petition. he quoted the relevant portion in unni krishnan's case, : [1993]1scr594 which quoted a good portion of the judgment in andi mukta satguru case, 1989 (2) llj 324. finally, learned additional advocate general, took us through the ..... 588 as per incuriam or obiter dictum, the matter was once again referred to a larger bench and it has been held by its judgment dated 22.11.1993, that writ petition is not maintainable against co-operative societies.5. when the matter stood thus, in a writ petition filed against the orders passed by a .....

Noorul Islam Education Trust, Nagercoil Vs. Government of Tamil Nadu a ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : AIR1991Mad141

..... earlier, it has been pointed out in detail how the unhealthy practice of granting provisional approval adopted by the madras university resulted in evil consequences. after referring to the provisions in the madras university act relating to grant of affiliation, the bench observed as follows :--'while the procedure prescribed by the statutes is unambiguous, ..... submitted their report in october, 1989, after completing the inspection on 7-10-1989. even while the application for affiliation was being considered by the university, the petitioner started admitting students inthe management quota and admitted 30students, 15 for electronics and communications and another 15 for computer scienceengineering. finding that there ..... 3-1987, 31-3-1988 and 31-3-1989. a statement of cash flow of the proposed college for the years 1989-90 to 1992-1993 prepared by the chartered accountants of the petitioner trust was also annexed to the reply affidavit. the substance of the reply affidavit is that the .....

Dr. Subramanian Swamy Vs. Deciding Authority and Others

Court : Chennai

Reported in : 1995CriLJ3380

..... . barat v. hari vinayak, : air1962mp73 relates to the power of the governor while acting as a chancellor of a university. it is now well known that the governor exercises his power as the chancellor under different provisions of the university acts. while doing so, he does not act 'in the exercise and performance of the powers and duties of his office.' therefore, ..... of curiosity, to ask the counsel for the first respondent as to why no orders have been passed, one way or the other on the petition dated 2-11-1993. shri k. parasaran, rightly cautions me that once i hold that i have no jurisdiction over the matter such a question is totally improper and inappropriate. i ..... respondent to the hon'ble the prime minister of india on 18-3-1994 which amply establishes the seriousness of the charges contained in his petition dated 2-11-1993.2a. mr. k. parasaran, learned senior counsel appearing for the second respondent says that none of the arguments advanced by the petitioner can give any scope for .....

S. Sundaram, Vs. Icici Bank Limited Rep. by Its Chairman and Managing ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (2009)8MLJ1119

..... service in the bank and who have retired subsequent to the expiry of the scheme mentioned in the circular co:gm:cir:2/93-94 dated may 20, 1993 and who were extended the additional benefits in addition to the normal retirement benefits shall be deemed and considered to have retired under v.r.s.36. ..... cultural activities to the workman.(12) ...(13) if the exercise of the power is arbitrary, unjust and unfair, the public authority, instrumentality, agency or the person acting in public interest, though in the field of private law, is not free to prescribe any unconstitutional conditions or limitations in their actions.the division bench held that the ..... amenable to writ jurisdiction under article 226 of constitution of india;(ii) dismissals, transfers and other matters concerning the service conditions of employees governed by i.d. act, have to be adjudicated only by the forums created under the said statute and not otherwise;(iii) it is needless to mention that the disputes relating to matters .....

Chandragiri Construction Company Vs. the Income-tax Settlement Commiss ...

Court : Chennai

..... said so both in the counter-affidavit as also in its purported show-cause notice.11. the said principle has been followed by this court in v.c., banaras hindu university v. shrikant(2006 (6) scale 66), stating: (scc p. 60, paras 48-49)48. the vice-chancellor appears to have made up his mind to impose the ..... respectively. therefore, there is much discrepancy in the disclosure made by the petitioner, which has prompted the second respondent to file the application under section 245d(6) of the act.17. it is in the above said factual context, the first respondent issued the impugned notice. on reference to the application filed by the second respondent before the settlement ..... of the deputy collector, land reforms. in that case, while the deputy collector, land reforms issued orders in 1976, the final order under section 11(1) of the act was not passed/issued till 1993. while considering the mandatory duty on the part of the authority in performing its function as per the provisions of the .....

Colgate-palmolive (India) Limited Vs. Anchor Health and Beauty Care Pr ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (2008)7MLJ1119; 2009(40)PTC653(Mad)

..... respondent from showing, screening, exhibiting or telecasting the offending tv commercials/advertisements which seek to disparage/denigrate the applicant's products.3. simultaneously, m/s. swabhanu universal agencies, the stockist of colgate palmolive (india) ltd., has come up with a similar suit c.s. no. 452 of 2008 for identical reliefs. pending their ..... , in view of the fact that the provisions of section 36a of mrtp act, 1969 (extracted above) stands imported verbatim into the consumer protection act, 1986 by the amendment act 50 of 1993. the definition of 'unfair trade practice' found in section 36a(1) of the mrtp act, 1969, is adopted in pari materia in section 2 ..... the provisions of the mrtp act. but he may be able to approach the competition commission. however, he cannot invoke the provisions of the consumer protection act, since that act is intended only for the benefit of consumers and not for the benefit of manufacturers, marketers or service providers. but he may have a common .....

D. Gayathri and Others Vs. The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by its Princi ...

Court : Chennai

..... , asked to appear for interview on various dates during july 2009. accordingly, they appeared for the interview before the selection committee duly constituted by the university as per the periyar university act, 1997 read with statutes and regulations framed thereunder. they were appointed as lecturers by the order dated 30.07.2009 and 03.08.2009, as ..... the candidate shall be with reference to the last date of the submission of the application for the concerned post unless the rules otherwise required. the four judgments, viz., (1993) 2 scc 429 (dr.m.v.nair ..vs.. union of india and others); (2000) 5 scc 262 (bhupinderpal singh and others ..vs.. state of punjab and ..... vizianagaram social welfare residential school society v. m. tripura sundari devi (1990) 3 scc 655, m.v. nair (dr.) v. union of india (1993) 2 scc 429,rekha chaturvedi v. university of rajasthan 1993 supp. (3) scc 168, u.p. public service commission, u.p., allahabad v. alpana (supra) and ashok kumar sharma v. chander shekhar ( .....

Bader Sayeed Vs. the Southern India Education Trust and Others

Court : Chennai

..... a suit was filed in the district munsif court, challenging termination. the defence was that the executive committee was not a statutory body and not bound under the university act. the suit was dismissed, holding that the executive committee was not a statutory body and not bound by the statutes. on appeal, the first additional civil ..... guidelines and norms prescribed herein are as under:- having regard to the definition of 'human rights' in section 2(d) of the protection of human rights act, 1993, taking note of the fact that the present civil and penal laws in india do not adequately provide for specific protection of women from sexual harassment in work ..... by this order are also observed by the employers in private sector. 12. these guidelines will not prejudice any rights available under the protection of human rights act, 1993. 18. accordingly, we direct that the above guidelines and norms would be strictly observed in all work places for the preservation and enforcement of the right .....