Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: tezpur university act 1993 section 11 the chancellor Sorted by: recent Court: chennai Page 1 of about 101 results (0.150 seconds)

Dove Investments Private Ltd. and ors. Vs. Gujarat Industrial Investme ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : [2005]124CompCas399(Mad); (2005)6CompLJ490(Mad); 2005(1)CTC249; (2005)1MLJ269; [2005]60SCL604(Mad)

..... the context, subject-matter and object of the statutory provision in question in determining whether the same is mandatory or directory. according to their lordships, no universal principle of law could be laid in that behalf as to whether a particular provision or enactment shall be considered mandatory or directory and it is the duty ..... 1965- 66 and sub-section (1-a), (1-b), (1-c) and (1-d) were introduced for the first time by the companies (amendment) act, 1965 [act 31/1965]. the learned judge has observed that the supreme court was interpreting the provisions of section 108 as it stood at the time of the impugned transaction therein ..... 6. after taking us through the company petition, counter, rejoinder, the details regarding civil suits, impugned order of the company law board and relevant provisions of the companies act, mr. a. alagiriswamy, learned senior counsel for the investors, and mr. p.h. aravindh pandian, learned counsel for the company, have raised the following contentions:(i) .....

Mo. Kandaswami Singh and Etc. Vs. State of Tamil Nadu and Others

Court : Chennai

Reported in : AIR1994Mad2

..... by his caste name, his greatness is denigrated. thus, the learned counsel contends that g.o. ms. no. 366, revenue department, dated 11-5-1993 naming the district with head-quarters at villupuram as villupuram ramaswami padayachiar district is against the provisions of the constitution, against secularism and against national unity and ..... of management of the then tamil nadu g.d. naidu agricultural university recommended to change the name of university as tamil nadu agricultural university and since almost all agricultural universities in india have been named after the state, it was renamed as tamil nadu agricultural university. thus, i am of the view, that the inauguration of ..... . the allegation of the petitioners that giving such a name as 'pudayachi' to the new district amounts to perpetuating caste and untouchability and such an act would be against the constitution and tends to violate the fundamental rights enshrined in articles 14 and 17 of the constitution, in my opinion, is not .....

Madras Christian College, Represented by Its Secretary, Rev. Dr. Franc ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (1992)1MLJ544

..... this court seeking reliefs as he did in the present writ petition. he would place reliance on a pronouncement of a bench of this court in association of university teachers v. state of tamil nadu and anr. : (1991)iillj31mad , to say that constitutional issues and constitutional validity of a statute or provision of the ..... we cannot say that we are called upon to decide the question for academic purposes only. by the introduction of chapter iii-a into the act by the amendment act provisions for appointment of special officer in certain cases get introduced and certainly the petitioner need not await enforcement of the said provisions against it, ..... prayed that this honourable court may be pleased to issue a writ of declaration, declaring the tamil nadu recognised private schools (regulation) and private colleges (regulation) amendment act, 1982 (48 of 1982) as ultra vires and unconstitutional in so far as the petitioners herein are concerned, and pass such further or other order or orders .....

K. Murugan and Others Vs. Dr. V.K. Marimuthu and Others

Court : Chennai Madurai

..... from this world and cannot, therefore, assist the court enquiring into its genuineness in any manner. (xii) in ramalakshmi alias ranjitham vs. janaki and others reported in 1993 (1) mlj 617, this court held as follows: 3. i do not think that the order of the trial court can be interfered with. when the counsel ..... of tamilnadu as additional evidence. in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the appellant has stated that since p.w.4 had violated the provisions of notaries act, 1952 and unlawfully taken part in the execution of impugned will dated 13.03.2005, he lodged a complaint to the secretary, law (administration) department, government of ..... does not ordinarily differ from that of proof of any other document except as to the special requirement of attestation prescribed by section 63 of the indian succession act. the onus of proof rests squarely on the person propounding a will and in the absence of any suspicious circumstances surrounding its execution, the proof of .....

S. Manonmony, Technical Assistant, Dr. T.P.M. Library, Madurai Vs. The ...

Court : Chennai Madurai

..... the respondents and perused the materials placed before this court. 5. the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that as per section 12(5) of the madurai kamaraj university act 1965, the first respondent is under the statutory obligation to give effect to the resolution/orders/approved of the syndicate of madurai kamaraj ..... university and as per the section 20 and 20(7) of madurai kamaraj university act 1965, the syndicate body is the executive body and executive power to administer the university is vested with it and it has power to appoint and promote assistant librarian at dr. ..... 19.09.1991 vide order dated 18.09.1991 issued by the second respondent, the registrar of madurai kamaraj university. at the time of appointment, she had qualified b.sc., b.l.i.sc., after that she qualified m.a., in the year 1993, m.l.i.s., in the year 1995, m.phil, in the year 2004 and on 27 .....

Dr. S. Revwathy Vs. The Government of Tamil Nadu, Represented by its P ...

Court : Chennai Madurai

..... till 1991 and she did her doctor of medicine (m.d., degree) in obstetrics and gynecology, in the year 1988-1990 at madurai medical college and passed with university rank in the year 1990 and thereafter, continued as medical officer at poolathur primary health centre, kodaikkanal, dindigul district and from june 1990 to december 1990, she ..... while holding the post of the director of medical education, in terms of para 2 of g.o. (ms)no.368, personnel and administrative reforms department, dated 18.10.1993, sent a proposal containing the names of the third respondent, the appellant/writ petitioner, dr. al. meenakshi sundaram and dr. a. edwin joe and also pointed out ..... petitioner may be positively considered as she will be the senior most medical officer in the civil medical list and the first respondent need not be influenced by the act of the appellant/writ petitioner in filing the writ petition as well as this writ appeal as she has exercised her legal and constitutional right. 9. per .....

Sree Krishna Education Trust, Represented by its Founder and Managing ...

Court : Chennai Madurai

..... is no clause as to the renewal of memorandum of understanding once in four years and the same is against the ingredients of tamilnadu agricultural university act 1971 and statutes of the tamilnadu agricultural university and its regulations. 2.3. as a matter of fact, a due reply was sent by the college relating to the ownership of ..... or any other fee from the newly admitted candidates. inasmuch as the same is not in consonance with the tamilnadu agricultural university act 1971, besides, the agreement entered between the fifth respondent/tamil nadu agricultural university, coimbatore and the petitioner herein, a writ petition in w.p.(md)no.10807 of 2015 was preferred before the madurai ..... counsel for the respondents 3 to 5 cites a decision of the hon'ble supreme court in st.jons teachers training institute, madurai vs. state of tamil nadureported in 1993 (3) scc. 595, wherein at special page no.605, at paragraph no.14, it is observed as follows:- mr. shanti bhushan appearing in civil appeals .....

A. Jaisankar and Others Vs. State of Tamil Nadu Rep by its Secretary t ...

Court : Chennai

..... suresh kumar, learned standing counsel, while replying to the contention of the petitioners that once they were appointed as per the rules framed under the annamalai university act, after the present annamalai university act 20 of 2013 came to be introduced with effect from 25.9.2013, the status of the persons already appointed under the old rules are protected ..... qualification. therefore, when there was no fault on the part of the petitioners for being appointed to the post of special officer and subsequently when the annamalai university act 20 of 2013 came into force with effect from 25.9.2013, the status of the persons already appointed under the old rules are also safely protected under ..... appointed on post does not create any right in his favour. (vide dr.m.s.patil v. gulbarga university and ors., air 2010 sc 3783). eligibility lacking 39. in dr.prit singh v. s.k.mangal and ors., 1993 supp (1) scc 714, this court examined the case of a person who did not possess the requisite .....

N.K. Jha Vs. Government of India, represented by The Joint Secretary t ...

Court : Chennai

..... for the second respondent, the order appointing the third respondent as vice-chancellor (in-charge) has been issued in strict compliance with the provisions of the pondicherry university act and the statutes. the third respondent has been appointed as vice-chancellor (in-charge) after putting the incumbent vice-chancellor to compulsory wait. 6. as regards ..... as follows:- (i) the petitioner was appointed as associate professor in the department of international studies (earlier it was designated as reader) on 28.12.1993 in the pondicherry university. subsequently, on 28.12.2001, he was promoted as professor and then to the post of dean of the school of social sciences and international ..... third respondent was appointed as reader on 25.09.1989, whereas, the petitioner was appointed to such post after a period of four years on 28.12.1993. subsequently, the third respondent was promoted as professor on 27.07.1998, but such promotion was conferred on the petitioner only on 28.12.2001 after three .....

Sarasamma Vs. G. Pandurangan and Others

Court : Chennai

..... o.p.no.387 of 2008 has been filed under sections 232, 255 and 276 of the indian succession act, which reads as follows: section 232: grant of administration to universal or residuary legatees:--when--(a) the deceased has made a will, but has not appointed an executor, ..... complaint (ex.p-3), dated 21.02.1996 to the chief justice of india regarding the suit in c.s.no.1115 of 1993 which was pending before this court. he also sent a complaint (ex.p-5) dated 30.04.1999 to the inspector of police ..... ) scc 325 (clarence pais and others vs. union of india): "6. ... ..... a combined reading of sections 213 and 57 of the act (indian succession act) would show that where the parties to the will are hindus or the properties in dispute are not in territories falling under sections 57(a) ..... .p-26. the said ulagarakshagan also filed c.s.no.1115 of 1993 before this court, in which, r.gopal filed counter affidavit in a.no.681 of 1993 in c.s.no.1115 of 1993, which is marked as ex.p-2. 61. from the above documents .....