Skip to content
How to use Narrow results with filters
  1. Run a keyword search first to load the results page.
  2. Select Supreme Court, a High Court, or tribunal on the left.
  3. Optionally filter by decision year to focus on recent or historical cases.

Tender - Judgment Search Results

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Mar 03 1884

Legal Tender Cases

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Mar-03-1884

Legal Tender Cases - 110 U.S. 421 (1884) U.S. Supreme Court Legal Tender Cases, 110 U.S. 421 (1884) Legal Tender


1870

Legal Tender Cases

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jan-01-1870

LEGAL TENDER CASES - 78 U.S. 682 (1870) U.S. Supreme Court LEGAL TENDER CASES, 78 U.S. 682 (1870) 78 U.S.


1870

Legal Tender Cases

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jan-01-1870

Legal Tender Cases - 79 U.S. 457 (1870) U.S. Supreme Court Legal Tender Cases, 79 U.S. 12 Wall. 457 457


18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jul 10 2023

M/S Valappy Explosives vs the Tender Inviting Authority (Dgm-O)

Court: Kerala

Decided on: Jul-10-2023

CHALAKUDY TALUK, THRISSUR DISTRICT, KERALA STATE., PIN - 680309 BY ADVS. SHIBIN K.F. SEBY JOSEPH RESPONDENT/S: 1 THE TENDER INVITING AUTHORITY (DGM-O) INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LTD., INDIAN OIL BHAVAN, G-9, ALI YAVAR JUNG MARG BANDRA (EAST), MUMBAI.


Oct 05 2023

M/S Valappy Explosives vs the Tender Inviting Authority (Dgm-O)

Court: Kerala

Decided on: Oct-05-2023

TALUK, THRISSUR DISTRICT, KERALA STATE. PIN- 680 309, PIN - BY ADVS. SHIBIN K.F. SEBY JOSEPH RESPONDENTS:1 THE TENDER INVITING AUTHORITY (DGM-O) INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LTD., INDIAN OIL BHAVAN, G-9, ALI YAVAR JUNG MARG BANDRA (EAST), MUMBAI,


Jun 17 2026

N.Nattathy Vs Tender Inviting Authority / The Managing Director

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Jun-17-2026

corresponding to the number of employees. Hence, the bidder was considered technically not qualified.2.The first respondent issued a tender notification dated 19.02.2026 inviting bids for handling and transportation of food grains and other notified commodities, together with


Jun 17 2026

N.Nattathy Vs Tender Inviting Authority / The Managing Director

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Jun-17-2026

corresponding to the number of employees. Hence, the bidder was considered technically not qualified.2.The first respondent issued a tender notification dated 19.02.2026 inviting bids for handling and transportation of food grains and other notified commodities, together with


Jun 12 2024

M/S Johnson & Smith Co., vs the Commissioner & Tender

Court: Karnataka

Decided on: Jun-12-2024

signed by (BY SRI. VIJAYA KUMAR, ADVOCATE) R HEMALATHA Location: HIGH COURT OF AND: KARNATAKA1. THE COMMISSIONER & TENDER ACCEPTING AUTHORITY, DEPARTMENT OF ANIMAL HUSBANDRY AND VETERINARY SERVICES, DR. ABMBEDKAR VEEDHI,2. THE DIRECTOR & HEAD OF TENDER


Jan 08 2003

Kiran Graphics Vs. Tender Committee Constituted for Technical and Pric ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Decided on: Jan-08-2003

Reported in: 2003(1)ALD808

ORDERGoda Raghuram, J.1. The respondents have cancelled the tendering process notified on 29-08-2002 for supply of printed forms to meet to the day-to-day requirements of the Postal


Nov 19 2004

Sree Lakshmi Metal Industries and Constructions Vs. Commissionerate of ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Decided on: Nov-19-2004

Reported in: 2005(1)ALD802

ORDERG. Yethirajulu, J.1. The petitioner is a firm undertaking contract works. The third respondent issued a tender notice on 7.9.2004 calling for tenders regarding the execution of the work of development of new internal roads,


  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »
Loading chart…

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial