Surplus - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: surplus Year: 2000 Page 1 of about 281 results (0.011 seconds)Halar Utkarsh Samiti Through Prakash H. Doshi Vs. State of Gujarat Thr ...
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Jul-13-2000
Reported in: (2001)2GLR964
words and therefore no provision is to be rendered as surplusage or nugatory ix even if the result may be unjust
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTJones Vs. United States
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: May-22-2000
should hesitate to treat statutory terms in any setting as surplusage and resistance should be heightened when the words describe an
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCarter Vs. United States
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Apr-19-2000
extra clauses in subsection b cannot be regarded as mere surplusage they mea n something potter v united states 155 u
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTOmkar Singh Vs. Nirmal
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: May-18-2000
Reported in: (2000)126PLR361
land under punjab act viii of 1953 is a mere surplusage the real object of the suit is to obtain a
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTHarish Chander and ors. Vs. Gurbachan Singh and ors.
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Mar-14-2000
Reported in: (2000)126PLR272
the deed and the declaration if any is only a surplusage the case would not be covered under section 7 iv
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBihari Silk and Rayon Processing Vs. Collr. of C. Ex.
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: May-03-2000
Reported in: (2000)(71)ECC97
the expression the amount specified in the notice a mere surplusage will be contrary to the well understood rules of interpretation
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTArtuz Vs. Bennett
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Nov-07-2000
renders the word properly and possibly both words properly filed surplusage since if the provision omitted those words and tolled simply
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBeck Vs. Prupis
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Apr-26-2000
our interpretation of 1962 d does not render it mere surplusage under our interpretation a plaintiff could through a 1964 c
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSarup Singh and Company and ors. Vs. State of Bihar and ors.
Court: Patna
Decided on: Feb-23-2000
cover such movement and render the word import or export surplusage the modes of transport of timber envisaged in the transit
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTState of Bihar, Etc. Vs. Mukul Mahto and ors. Etc.
Court: Patna
Decided on: Mar-16-2000
finding in the revision application and now it is a surplusage 22 in the result the government appeal is allowed the
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial