Surplus - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: surplus Year: 1981 Page 1 of about 204 results (0.013 seconds)Sadasiba Ratha and ors. Vs. Bimala Dibya and ors.
Court: Orissa
Decided on: Dec-22-1981
Reported in: AIR1982Ori129
or whether it is an unnecessary claim and a mere surplusage and the suit is really suit for partition see air
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTT. Gattaiah and 86 ors. Vs. Commissioner of Labour and anr.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-02-1981
Reported in: [1981(43)FLR202]; (1981)IILLJ54AP
in art 226 of the constitution would be a mere surplusage because it adds nothing more to authority such an interpretation
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCounty of Washington Vs. Gunther
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-08-1981
bennett amendment the second sentence of 703 h is mere surplusage united states v menasche 348 u s 528 348 u
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTUnited Air Lines, Inc. Vs. Division of Industrial Safety of
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jan-01-1981
grounded in federal law the anti injunction act would be surplusage under this theory all such litigants would be required to
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBhura Brothers and anr. Vs. Dinendra Narayan Ray and ors.
Court: Guwahati
Decided on: Jan-08-1981
act in which cases determination of tenancy becomes a mere surplusage as a landlord cannot evict a tenant even after such
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMotilal Vs. Abdul Mazid
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Jul-24-1981
Reported in: AIR1982Bom157
sub sec which will make one of them redundant or surplusage more so as the area and the field covered by
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRampur Engineering Co. Ltd. Vs. State and ors.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Aug-10-1981
Reported in: AIR1981All396
the state of uttar pradesh the other two defendants being surplusage and indeed the name of the third defendant respondent sri
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTNiranjan Kaur Vs. Nirbigan Kaur
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Jun-04-1981
Reported in: AIR1981P& H368
the deed and the declaration if any is only a surplusage the case would not be covered under section 7 iv
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTS.P. Gupta Vs. President of India and ors.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Dec-30-1981
Reported in: AIR1982SC149; 1981Supp(1)SCC87; [1982]2SCR365
the said letter which would be more or less a surplusage and would have naturally embittered the relations between the two
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTGokaraju Rangaraju Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Apr-15-1981
Reported in: AIR1981SC1473; 1981CriLJ876; 1981(1)SCALE706; (1981)3SCC132; [1981]3SCR474
that the 20th amendment of the constitution would be a surplusage if the de facto doctrine was to be applied to
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial