Surplus - Judgment Search Results
Surplus Trading Co. Vs. Cook
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-02-1930
Surplus Trading Co. v. Cook - 281 U.S. 647 (1930) U.S. Supreme Court Surplus Trading Co. v. Cook, 281
Gangadhar (Dead) by L.Rs. Vs. Surplus Land Determination Tribunal and ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Feb-01-1991
Reported in: AIR1991SC1181; JT1991(5)SC124; 1991(1)SCALE106; (1991)1SCC631; 1991(1)LC476(SC)
leave have arisen out of a proceeding under the Maharashtra Agricultural Lands (Ceiling on Holdings) Act, 1961. The Surplus Land Determination Tribunal determined the holding of the appelant, Gangadhar since dead, as of 142 acre and 3
Namdeo Shripat More Since Deceased Through Lrs. Manikrao Namdevrao Mor ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Jul-04-2003
Reported in: 2004(2)MhLj1041
Act). He had shown land admeasuring 102 acres and 2 gunthas to be in his possession. The Chairman, Surplus Land Determination Tribunal, Karjat (hereinafter referred to as the S.L.D.T.) in his order in case No. Malthan 515
18-section briefs on any result in this list
Fatima W/O Kasam Saheb Bagwan Since Deceased (Through L.Rs. Abdul Kasa ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: May-06-2009
Reported in: 2009(3)BomCR532; 2009(111)BomLR2022; 2010(1)MhLj142
basic question whether Fatima Kasam Bagwan who died pending these petitions and her son Abdul Aziz were holding surplus land within the meaning of provisions of the Maharashtra Agricultural Lands (Ceiling on Holdings) Act, 1961. Both these
Makhan Singh Vs. the State of Haryana Through the Collector Surplus Ar ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: May-11-2005
Reported in: (2005)141PLR123
quashing the orders dated 6.7.1984 (Annexure P-1), 22.8.1986 (Annexure P-3) and 23.6.1987 (Annexure P-4) passed by the Collector Surplus Area, Sirsa, the Commissioner, Hisar Division, Hisar and the Financial Commissioner, Haryana respectively.2. The petitioner claims the status
Smt. Ranjeet Kaur Vs. State of Haryana Through the Collector, Surplus ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: May-11-2005
Reported in: (2005)141PLR116
for quashing orders dated 6.7.1984 (Annexure P-1), 22.8.1986 (Annexure P-3) and 23.6.1987 (Annexure P-4) passed by the Collector Surplus Area, Sirsa, Commissioner, Hisar Division, Hisar Camp at Hisar and the Financial Commissioner, Haryana respectively.2. The petitioner claims
Rawat Singh Son of Shri Hari Singh Resident of Village Dhingsara Vs. S ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Jul-23-2013
accorded proprietary rights of lands in their occupancy. The dispute was with reference to the assessment of the surplus holding under the relevant Acts and the claim of the landowners for reassessment of property that they could
The State of Maharashtra, Vs. Shri Murarao Malojirao Ghorpade,
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Oct-16-2009
Reported in: 2009(6)MhLj788
prohibition on holding land in excess of ceiling area declaring the area in excess of ceiling to be surplus lands. Constitutional validity of Section 3 of the Act was challenged before a bench of this Court.3. The
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free