Surplus - Judgment Search Results
Surplus Trading Co. Vs. Cook
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-02-1930
taxes of Pulaski County, Arkansas, to enforce payment by the Surplus Trading Company of taxes for the years 1922 and 1923,
Namdeo Shripat More Since Deceased Through Lrs. Manikrao Namdevrao Mor ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Jul-04-2003
Reported in: 2004(2)MhLj1041
order of the S.L.D.T. and declared that the petitioner was surplus landholder to the extent of 25 acres and 11 gunthas
Gangadhar (Dead) by L.Rs. Vs. Surplus Land Determination Tribunal and ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Feb-01-1991
Reported in: AIR1991SC1181; JT1991(5)SC124; 1991(1)SCALE106; (1991)1SCC631; 1991(1)LC476(SC)
the Maharashtra Agricultural Lands (Ceiling on Holdings) Act, 1961. The Surplus Land Determination Tribunal determined the holding of the appelant, Gangadhar
Smt. Ranjeet Kaur Vs. State of Haryana Through the Collector, Surplus ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: May-11-2005
Reported in: (2005)141PLR116
As narrated in the earlier part of this judgment, the surplus area case was remanded to the Collector by the Commissioner
Makhan Singh Vs. the State of Haryana Through the Collector Surplus Ar ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: May-11-2005
Reported in: (2005)141PLR123
a notice, of the pendency of the proceedings to declare surplus land belonging to his landlord, which included the land comprised
Fatima W/O Kasam Saheb Bagwan Since Deceased (Through L.Rs. Abdul Kasa ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: May-06-2009
Reported in: 2009(3)BomCR532; 2009(111)BomLR2022; 2010(1)MhLj142
was not having any surplus land.5. After declaring land as surplus and after the order dated 15.1.1990 referred to above, the
Rawat Singh Son of Shri Hari Singh Resident of Village Dhingsara Vs. S ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Jul-23-2013
Surplus Area, Fatehabad. This order of remand directing the Collector, Surplus Area, was issued on 06.05.1986, as we have state earlier,
The State of Maharashtra, Vs. Shri Murarao Malojirao Ghorpade,
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Oct-16-2009
Reported in: 2009(6)MhLj788
Ceiling Case No. 43A and as confirmed by the Chairman Surplus Land Determination Tribunal was bad, illegal, null and void, without
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›