Surplus - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: surplus Year: 1995 Page 1 of about 251 results (0.013 seconds)State Level Committee and Another Vs. M/S. Morgardshammar India Ltd.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Nov-10-1995
Reported in: AIR1996SC524; JT1996(8)SC53; 1995(6)SCALE306; (1996)1SCC108; [1995]Supp5SCR63; [1996]101STC1(SC)
would make the words acquired for use superfluous and a surplusage no such interpretation ought to be adopted by a court
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTJyotiben Ramlal Purohit and Etc. Vs. State of Gujarat and anr.
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Dec-14-1995
Reported in: 1997CriLJ1549; (1996)1GLR395
the court cannot be read into the provision by any surplusage it has to be borne in mind that the legislature
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAmmini E.J. and Etc. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Feb-24-1995
Reported in: AIR1995Ker252
ramakrishnan j 1 the constitutional validity of section 10 of the indian divorce act 1869 for short the act which...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBailey Vs. United States
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Oct-30-1995
terms to have meaning judges should hesitate to treat as surplusage statutory terms in any setting and resistance should be heightened
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBabbitt Vs. Sweet Home Chapter, Communities for Great Ore.
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Apr-17-1995
to define take a reluctance to treat statutory terms as surplusage supports the reasonableness of the secretary s interpretation see e
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBibhishan Yeshwant Babar Vs. Executive Engineer, Kukadi Prakalp Bhuvik ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Nov-14-1995
Reported in: (1997)IIILLJ1081Bom
with effect from october 25 1986 on the ground of surplusage on june 18 1987 the petitioner went to the site
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSatish Ganesh Saphtarshi and ors. Vs. Kirloskar Oil Engines Ltd. and o ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Jan-27-1995
Reported in: (1995)IILLJ528Bom
the legislature must be presumed to have avoided redundancy or surplusage of language and every word used in the statute must
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRev. A. Prabhuchand and ors. Vs. Yeshurathna and ors.
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Dec-06-1995
Reported in: ILR1997KAR29; 1996(1)KarLJ524
exercise and that part of rule 3 will be a surplusage for all practical purpose proviso to rule 3 of order
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSurendra Kumar JaIn Vs. Shanti Swaroop Jain
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Jan-23-1995
Reported in: AIR1995All273
in the statute cannot be deemed to be a mere surplusage and have to be given due weight while construing the
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTShankar Vs. Indore Municipal Corporation and ors.
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-19-1995
Reported in: AIR1996MP154; 1996(0)MPLJ798
to brush aside words in a statute as being inapposite surplusage if they can have appropriate application in circumstances conceivably within
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial