Succession - Judgment Search Results
The Commissioner of Central Vs. Success
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT
Decided on: Mar-22-2006
Reported in: (2006)(109)ECC122
1. This is a Revenue appeal against the OIA No. 47/2003 dated 31.01.2003 setting aside the demands confirmed in OIO No. 22/2001 dated 25.01.2001. The demands were raised for enhancing the assessable value of Polyester Sewing...
Kalpraj Dharamshi Successful Resolution Applicant Vs. Kotak Investment ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Mar-10-2021
as under: Case No.& Cause title Particulars of 9 Cause title the appellant C.A. No.2943 Kalpraj Dharamshi & Successful 2944/2020 anr. Vs. Resolution Kotak Investment Applicant Advisors Ltd. & Anr. C.A. No.3138 Deutsche Bank AG vs. Financial
Success Tours and Travels Private Limited and Anr, Vs. Income Tax offi ...
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Mar-23-2017
Form No.J(2) GA NO.3855 OF2015WITH ITAT NO.178 OF2015IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA SPECIAL JURISDICTION(INCOME-TAX) ORIGINAL SIDE SUCCESS TOURS AND TRAVELS PRIVATE LIMITED AND ANR, Versus INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-9(4) KOLKATA & ORS. BEFORE: The Hon’ble
18-section briefs on any result in this list
Competition Success Review Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-07-2003
Reported in: 2003VIIIAD(Delhi)442; 106(2003)DLT469; 2003(70)DRJ690
parties the matter is taken up for final disposal.The petitioner publishes, inter alia, the english monthly entitled 'Competition Success Review'. This monthly publication is admittedly a 'newspaper' in terms of the Indian Post Office Act, 1898 and
Success Software Vs. 1.The Director of Rural Development and
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-14-2014
DATED:14. 08.2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.S.SIVAGNANAM W.P.(MD) No.9333 of 2014 and M.P.(MD) Nos.1 & 2 of 2014 Success Software rep. Through one of it's partners K.Sivakumar Having office at 82/347, 2nd floor Arcot Kodambakk, Chennai and
Great Success Martime and Trading Co. Pvt. Ltd., by their Power of Att ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-16-1994
Reported in: (1994)2MLJ452
ORDERAR. Lakshmanan, J.1. Application Nos. 101 and 102 of 1994 have been filed by the plaintiff to direct the defendants to furnish security in a sum of Rs. 31,91,977 and for a prohibitory order restraining the...
Success Engg R.K. Export, More Vs. Commissioner of Customs
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Decided on: Feb-09-2004
1. These stay applications are being disposed of by this common order.Nobody appeared other than for M/s C. Jivram Joshi & Sons and Shri Sunil Choudhary for which Mr Mondal, the learned Consultant appears.2. Heard Mr...
Succession of Serralles Vs. Esbri
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jan-02-1906
Succession of Serralles v. Esbri - 200 U.S. 103 (1906) U.S. Supreme Court Succession of Serralles v. Esbri, 200
State of Bihar and ors. Vs. Secretariat Assistant Successful Examinees ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Oct-08-1993
Reported in: (1994)ILLJ625SC; [1993]Supp3SCR134; 1994(1)LC235(SC); (1994)2UPLBEC951
in 1985 and declaring the result almost three years later in 1990 has caused great hardship to the successful candidates. The State was expected not to act in the such a leisurely manner and treat the matter
1.Director of Rural Development and Panchayat Raj, Vs. Success Softwar ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-04-2015
Panchayat Union, Thiruparankundram, Madurai District. 17.The Commissioner, Municipality, Melur, Madurai District. 18.The Commissioner, Municipality, Thriumangalam, Madurai District.Appellants versus Success Software, Rep. through one of its Partners K.Sivakumar, Having Office at 82/347, 2nd Floor, ArCo.Road, Kodambakkam, Chennai. Residing
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- Next ›
- Last »
Hover bars for counts · drag or use +/− to zoom · click a bar to filter by year
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free