Subdivision - Judgment Search Results

Jini Dhanrajgir, Vs. the Commissioner, Corporation of Chennai,

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (2003)2MLJ217

..... dismissed wamps no 3935 to 3938 and 4230 to 4233 of 2002 are dismissed property subdivision rules 4 and 19 of development control rules tamil nadu town and country planning act .....

Jinks Vs. Richland County

Court: US Supreme Court

..... in federal court is unconstitutional as applied to lawsuits brought against a state s political subdivisions the issue before us is the validity of that constitutional determination i a when a ..... was unconstitutional as applied to claims brought in state court against a state s political subdivisions because it interferes with the state s sovereign authority to establish the extent to which .....

Dole Food Co. Vs. Patrickson

Court: US Supreme Court

..... other ownership interest is owned by a foreign state or political subdivision thereof together with no 01 594 dead sea bromine co ltd ..... 2 which is an organ of a foreign state or political subdivision thereof or a majority of whose shares or other ownership interest ..... other ownership interest is owned by a foreign state or political subdivision thereof 1603 b 2 we hold that only direct ownership of .....

In Re: Moschip Semiconductor Technology Limited

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 2003(5)ALD827; [2004]120CompCas108(AP); [2004]50SCL405(AP)

..... corporation is a foreign corporation then subject to the requirements of subdivision d and of section 407 and chapters 12 commencing with ..... jurisdiction in which it is organized but except as provided in subdivision e the merger shall be effective as to any domestic ..... jurisdiction upon the filing in this state as required by this subdivision 15 a perusal of the above provision particularly clause d .....

Chotanagpur Motor Kamgar Union Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors.

Court: Jharkhand

Reported in: [2004(2)JCR140(Jhr)]

..... is no bus stand notified by regional transport authority for ramgarh subdivision a bus stand or parking zone places of bus is ..... fact that there was no notified bus stand of the ramgarh subdivision the president of india ordered to adopt certain measures in ..... bus stand having notified by the regional transport authority in the subdivision ramgarh the question of shifting of bus stand does not arise .....

Virginia Vs. Hicks

Court: US Supreme Court

..... 30 2003 decided june 16 2003 the richmond redevelopment and housing authority rrha a political subdivision of virginia owns and operates whitcomb court a lowincome housing development in 1997 the richmond ..... then conveyed these streets by a recorded deed to the rrha which is a political subdivision of the commonwealth of virginia this deed required the rrha to give the appearance that .....

Nevada Dept. of Human Resources Vs. Hibbs

Court: US Supreme Court

..... to include both the government of a state or political subdivision thereof and any agency of a state or a political subdivision of a state 203 x 2611 4 a iii we .....

Shaukat Ali Vs. Allahabad Development Authority and anr.

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: 2003(4)AWC2939; (2003)2UPLBEC1573

..... act in our opinion this provision does not permit the a d a to levy subdivision charges or open space charges as a bare perusal of the provision indicates moreover it ..... denied by the respondents and they have only stated that they have power to levy subdivision charge and open space charge they have not denied that no park or open space .....

Boeing Co. Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

..... excess of gross receipts over their total costs which relate to such gross receipts 12 subdivision iii of that rule on which boeing relies provides costs other than cost of goods ..... which relate to such gross receipts the following rules shall be applied i subject to subdivisions ii through v of this subparagraph the taxpayer s method of accounting used in computing .....

Tukaram Motiram Shinde (Dead Through L.Rs.) Dattarao S/O Tukaram Shind ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 2003(4)ALLMR1015; 2003(6)BomCR389; 2003(3)MhLj182

..... of the defendant by the plaintiff is void as the defendant has purchased the two subdivision of survey no 65 i e 65 3 from the plaintiff admeasuring 2 acres and ..... the two holdings were itself fragment and accepted by the revenue authorities who permitted the subdivision of survey no 65 then in all probabilities it is after coming into force of .....