Subdivision - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: subdivision Year: 1967 Page 1 of about 22 results (0.005 seconds)Keyishian Vs. Board of Regents
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jan-23-1967
..... declaration of independence violate this prohibition similar uncertainty arises as to the application of subdivision 1 b of 105 that subsection requires the disqualification of an employee involved ..... or to reject the recommendations for such action e following the determination required in subdivision d of this paragraph the school authorities shall immediately institute proceedings for the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTChicago and N.W. R. Co. Vs. A., T and S.F. R. Co.
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: May-29-1967
..... or all of the reductions in the mountain pacific divisions unless the commission prescribed subdivisions within mountain pacific territory nevertheless it joined the other mountain pacific lines in stating ..... column two the midwestern factor for eastern transcontinental traffic column two also applies to subdivisions of carriage in midwestern territory to illustrate the operation of the scale assume a .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTWisconsIn Vs. Illinois
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jan-01-1967
..... ordered adjudged and decreed that 1 the state of illinois and its municipalities political subdivisions agencies and instrumentalities including among others the cities of chicago evanston highland park ..... by infiltration from lake michigan by the state of illinois and its municipalities political subdivisions agencies and instrumentalities the sewage effluent derived from which reaches the canal b .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTReitman Vs. Mulkey
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: May-29-1967
..... 1964 provides in part as follows neither the state nor any subdivision or agency thereof shall deny limit or abridge directly or ..... agents or representatives but does not include the state or any subdivision thereof with respect to the sale lease or rental of ..... reads in relevant part as follows neither the state nor any subdivision or agency thereof shall deny limit or abridge directly or indirectly .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBerger Vs. New York
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-12-1967
..... of any police department of the state or of any political subdivision thereof the oath must state that there is reasonable ground ..... for eavesdropping an ex parte order for eavesdropping as defined in subdivisions one and two of section seven hundred thirty eight of ..... any police department of the state or of any political subdivision thereof that there is reasonable ground to believe that evidence .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTNeely Vs. MartIn K. Eby Construction Co., Inc.
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Mar-20-1967
..... verdict had been directed footnote 2 principally the amendments added new subdivisions c and d to rule 50 c same conditional rulings on ..... if the motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict provided for in subdivision b of this rule is granted the court shall also rule ..... 50 c 2 the rules committee explained this provision as follows subdivision c 2 is a reminder that the verdict winner is entitled .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTWhitehill Vs. Elkins
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Nov-06-1967
..... of the united states or the state of maryland or any political subdivision of either of them by force or violence page 389 u s ..... the united states or of the state of maryland or any political subdivision of either of them by revolution force or violence or who ..... business of this state or of any county municipality or other political subdivision of this state shub tells us that the ober act was enacted .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSailors Vs. Board of Educ. of Kent County
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: May-22-1967
..... in reynolds v sims supra at 377 u s 575 political subdivisions of states counties cities or whatever never were and never have ..... local officials a state cannot of course manipulate its political subdivisions so as to defeat a federally protected right as for example ..... by realigning political subdivisions so as to deny a person his vote because of race .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTGardner Vs. Toilet Goods Assn., Inc.
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: May-22-1967
..... as amended 21 u s c 371 f section 701 by subdivision a contains the secretary s general authority exercised in the ..... cases to promulgate regulations for the efficient enforcement of the act subdivisions e and f provide for public hearings administrative findings and judicial ..... in the courts of appeals footnote 2 5 the saving clause subdivision 6 of subsection f specifically and carefully refers to the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTIn Re Gault
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: May-15-1967
..... has violated a law of the state or an ordinance or regulation of a political subdivision thereof the law which gerald was found to have violated is ars 13 377 this ..... has violated a law of the state or an ordinance or regulation of a political subdivision thereof b a child who by reason of being incorrigible wayward or habitually disobedient is .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial