Subdivision - Judgment Search Results

Carlisle Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

..... to grant such a judgment after submission to the jury second subdivision b accommodates the defendant s right to move for a directed ..... with the government s right to seek appellate review indeed the subdivision was amended in 1994 for the very purpose of striking a ..... guilty verdict can hardly be said to undermine the purpose of subdivision b the defendant s interests are obviously fully protected by an .....

Bush Vs. Vera

Court: US Supreme Court

..... natural geographical boundaries contiguity compactness 960 opinion of o connor j and conformity to political subdivisions 861 f supp at 1333 the court instead found that generally texas has not ..... and the department of justice has since frequently interposed objections against the state and its subdivisions appellants attempt to link that history to evidence that in recent elections in majority .....

United States Vs. Armstrong

Court: US Supreme Court

..... allegations of selective prosecution i agree with the court for reasons the opinion states that subdivision a l c does not apply to selective prosecution claims the court was not called ..... which the defendant can show that the evidence is material seems unwise for this reason subdivision a l c also contains language to compel disclosure if the government intends to use .....

Printz Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

..... to address particular problems nor command the states officers or those of their political subdivisions to administer or enforce a federal regulatory program it matters not whether policymaking is ..... added force with respect to pol construe the amendment to afford protection to political subdivisions such as counties and municipalities lake country estates inc v tahoe regional planning agency .....

Arizonans for Official English Vs. Arizona

Court: US Supreme Court

..... applies to i the legislative executive and judicial branches of government ii all political subdivisions departments agencies organizations and instrumentalities of this state including local governments and municipalities ..... state to preserve protect and enhance english section 2 this state and all political subdivisions of this state shall take all reasonable steps to preserve protect and enhance .....

Medtronic, Inc. Vs. Lohr

Court: US Supreme Court

..... section 360k b provides b exempt requirements upon application of a state or a political subdivision thereof the secretary may by regulation promulgated after notice and opportunity for an oral hearing ..... conditions as may be prescribed in such regulation a requirement of such state or political subdivision applicable to a device intended for human use if 1 the requirement is more stringent .....

Mafatlal Industries Ltd. and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: 2002(83)ECC85; 1997(89)ELT247(SC); JT1996(11)SC283; 1996(9)SCALE457; (1997)5SCC536; [1996]Supp10SCR585; [1998]111STC467(SC)

..... or collected from any manufacturer producer or importer in respect of the tax imposed by subdivision 3 of section 600 of the revenue act of 1924 or sub division 3 of ..... or collected from any manufacturer producer or importer in respect of the tax imposed by subdivision 3 of section 600 of the revenue act of 1924 unless either 1 pursuant to .....

Baldevraj Sitaram Malhotra Vs. Income-tax Officer/Deputy

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Pune

..... the computation sheet and the value adopted by shri gandhe for the land covered by subdivision no 1 of survey no 31 after extracting the following note found under the computation ..... the revenue is that neither the capital gains nor business profits consequent upon sale of subdivision no 1 31 on july 21 1980 to smt rajinder mohini malhotra were disclosed for .....

Shaw Vs. Hunt

Court: US Supreme Court

..... that although compliance with traditional districting principles such as compactness contiguity and respect for political subdivisions may well suffice to refute a claim of racial gerrymandering a state cannot make ..... identified discrimination id at 499 500 505 507 509 while the states and their subdivisions may take remedial action when they possess evidence of past or present discrimination they .....

J.C. Khosla Vs. K.G. Khosla and ors.

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 1995IIIAD(Delhi)857; 1995(34)DRJ583

..... construction of a wall from x i x 3 will amount in fact to actual subdivision of the property nor i am considering the question as to whether the said letter ..... wall is constructed to the end of the property it may amount to partitioning and subdivision of the property which may come within the mischief of the restrictions imposed by the .....