Subdivision - Judgment Search Results

United States Vs. Hyde

Court: US Supreme Court

..... the plea is voluntary 1 the opening words of these two subdivisions are important together they speak of steps a district court must ..... but that prerequisite is absent from the list set out in subdivisions c and d strongly suggesting that no such addition is warranted ..... the court of appeals holding contradicts this implication and thus strips subdivision e 4 of any meaning not only is the court of .....

Reno Vs. Bossier Parish School Bd.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... purpose 5 applies only to certain states and their political subdivisions such a covered ju 478 risdiction may not implement any ..... this broader mandate 2 bars all states and their political subdivisions from maintaining any voting standard practice or procedure that results ..... of any new voting procedure unless the state or political subdivision institutes an action in the federal district court for the .....

Abrams Vs. Johnson

Court: US Supreme Court

..... on maintaining district cores four traditional corner districts in the corners of the state political subdivisions such as counties and cities and an urban majority black district in the atlanta area ..... district court s plan is marginally superior in respect to the third criterion maintaining political subdivisions plan b splits six counties within the atlanta area but none outside the atlanta area .....

Amchem Products, Inc. Vs. Windsor

Court: US Supreme Court

..... bound by class representatives decisions persists when settlement rather than trial is proposed those subdivisions safeguards provide practical checks in the settlement context first their standards serve to inhibit ..... s at 176 177 adequate representation does not eliminate additional requirement to provide notice subdivisions a and b focus court attention on whether a proposed class has sufficient .....

ingalls Shipbuilding, Inc. Vs. Director, Office of Workers' Compensati ...

Court: US Supreme Court

..... lhwca amendments of 1972 86 stat 1251 that the board is a subdivision of the department of labor ante at 269 but of course ..... entity into something it is not while the board may be a subdivision of the department of labor and thereby subject to the secretary s ..... for board the court expressly acknowledges that the board is not a subdivision in the sense that the secretary as head of the department can .....

Suitum Vs. Tahoe Regional Planning Agency

Court: US Supreme Court

..... complex was rejected by the local planning commission as inconsistent with zoning ordinances and subdivision regulations in eight different respects this court acknowledged that r espondent ha d submitted ..... a final agency position in macdonald a developer purchased property and presented a tentative subdivision plan to the local planning commission after the commission treated the proposal as .....

City of Boerne Vs. Flores

Court: US Supreme Court

..... acting under color oflaw of the united states as well as to any state or subdivision of a state 2000bb 2 1 the act s universal coverage is confirmed in 2000bb ..... overbreadth the coverage under the act would terminate at the behest of states and political subdivisions in which the danger of substantial voting discrimination has not materialized during the preceding five .....

Zaibunnisa Begum Vs. State of A.P. Rep. by the Collector and ors.

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 1997(4)ALT659

..... and non agricultural lands were maintained separately it was also stated that in view of subdivision of old survey no 162 corresponding to new survey no 16 a supplement was issued ..... and the tonch drawn in accordance with this subdivision is sent for correcting the records ex a 53 is the letter issued by the .....

Hardeo Prasad Vs. Depot Manager, Biscomaun Hilsa and ors.

Court: Patna

..... context c controller means in respect of any local areas comprised within the limit of subdivision the sub divisional officer incharge of the sub division and includes any other officer appointed .....

Vidya Devi and ors. Vs. Kausalya Devi and ors.

Court: Patna

..... and 11 of the act the different heirs mentioned n what may be described as subdivision of any particular entry in class ii of the schedule do not inherit simultaneously accordingly .....