Skip to content


Stay - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: stay Page 1 of about 7 results (0.015 seconds)
Sep 13 1995 (SC)

Pleasant Stay Hotel and anr. Vs. Palani Hills Conservation Council and ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: JT1995(6)SC600; 1995(5)SCALE251; (1995)6SCC127; [1995]Supp3SCR588

the High Court on December 12, 1994 and an interim stay was granted.14. All the writ petitions were thereafter heard together

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 22 2005 (TRI)

Commissioner of Central Excise Vs. Stay-on-papers (P) Ltd.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT

Reported in: (2006)(193)ELT204Tri(Bang.)

by Shri Ganeshan wherein details of invoices raised by M/s. Stay on Papers Pvt. Ltd. comprising invoice No. 205 for quantity

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 23 1999 (TRI)

Commissioner of C. Ex. Vs. Stay Sharp Diamond Tools Ltd.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in: (1999)(112)ELT1063TriDel

1. Revenue filed this appeal in Order-in-Appeal dated 14-10-1991 passed by the Collector of Central Excise (Appeals),

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 03 2009 (HC)

In Re: an Appln. for Stay (Can 6546/05)

Court: Kolkata

a petition for stay of the impugned judgment. In the stay petition the submissions earlier made before the Trial Court have

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 03 2009 (HC)

In Re: for Stay (Can 6546/05)

Court: Kolkata

perused the entire record which has been attached with the stay petition. A perusal of the aforesaid shows that lengthy statements

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 11 2014 (HC)

Whether the Plaintiff Is Entitled to Injunction as Prayed For? Vs. Har ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

the following issues: 1. Whether the plaintiff is entitled to injunction as prayed for?. OPP2 Whether the suit of the plaintiff

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 11 2014 (HC)

“suit for Permanent Injunction Restraining the Vs. Tarlochan Singh a ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

of 2014 in 4 Rs.No.3233 of 2013 entitled to permanent injunction and the defendant-respondents were restrained from disconnecting the tubewell connection.

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.
  • Next >>

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //