Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: standards of weights and measures act 1976 section 66 penalty for contravention of section 49 Page 1 of about 193 results (0.197 seconds)

Mukul Dalmia and ors. Vs. Kiran Pal and anr.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 2001IVAD(Delhi)282; 91(2001)DLT65

..... and other witnesses were examined and on the basis of the pre-summoning evidence led a fresh order of summoning the petitioners under section 39(2) of the standards of weights and measures (enforcement) act, 1985 read with section 420, ipc was passed. irregularity, if any, stood fully cured. the argument that the trial court could ..... that there is sufficient material on record to proceed against the respondent nos. 1,2 and 3 for the offences punishable under section 39(2) of the standard of weight and measures (enforcement) act, 1985 as well as under section 420, ipc. accordingly, all the three respondents be summoned as accused filing pf and copy of ..... 482 of criminal procedure code, 1973 (for short, cr.p.c.) seeking quashing of the order dated 17.7.1999 summoning the petitioners under section 50 of the standards of weights and measures act, 1976 in the complaint filed by respondent no.1 (hereinafter the complainant); on the ground that no valid cognizance could be taken without recording .....

Director/Company Secretary, I.C.i. India Ltd. and ors. Vs. Inspector, ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 1994(1)ALT(Cri)606; 1993CriLJ3523

..... fourteen tablets in a strip is construed as a single unit. he relies upon the definition contained under sub-section (b) of s. 2 of the standards of weights and measures act, 1976, to the effect that 'commodity in packed form' means commodity packaged, whether in any bottle, tin, wrapper or otherwise, in units ..... file of the i addl. judicial first class magistrate, warangal. 2. the prosecution is launched for the violation of the provisions of standards of weights and measures act, 1976, and the rules of weights and measures (packed commodities) rules, 1977. concisely the case is that the commodity in question i.e., tenormin eles tablets with ..... each strip of fourteen tablets as a unit, the package contains twelve such strips printing the necessary declaration as contemplated under law such as, the components, the weight, the price, the batch number, the manufacturing date, the expiry date etc. these conform to the rules, and the interpretation placed by the prosecution is incorrect .....

M/S. Mahindra and Mahindra Ltd., Rep. by Its Power of Attorney Holder ...

Court : Kerala

Reported in : 2011(2)KLJ613; 2011(2)ILR(Ker)804; 2011(2)KLT1040; 2011CrLJ3791; 2011(2)KHC582

..... carton or other thing, or (e) expresses, in relation to any transaction, industrial production or protection, any quantity or dimension., otherwise than in accordance with the standard weight or measure, shall be punished with fine which may extent to two thousand rupees, and, for the second or subsequent offence, with imprisonment for a term which may ..... number of the net contents of any package on the package itself or on any label, carton or other thing, otherwise than in accordance with standard weight or measure. sale of a vehicle is not in packages or in carton or on the basis of a label. therefore, section 11(d) is ..... in relation to any transaction, industrial production or protection, any quantity or dimension, otherwise than in accordance with the standard weight or measure." section 41: "41. penalty for contravention of section 11:- except where he is permitted under the standards act so to do, whoever, in relation to any goods or things which are sold, transferred, distributed or .....

M.V. Krishnaiah and Another Vs. Government of Andhra Pradesh, Food and ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 1999(3)ALD296; 1999(3)ALT315

..... as rightly pointed out by the learned government pleader that the system of undertaking repairs of weights and measures is not a free trade. section 9 of the enforcement act, 1985 prohibits the usage of weights and measures other than standard weights and measures which is required to be kept in the premises and the state government is ..... authorised under section 10 to issue necessary directions not to use any weight, measure or number except the specified one in that regard by ..... in purported exercise of the power conferred under sub-section (1) of section 72 of the enforcement act, 1985 framed the rules known as the andhra pradesh standards of weights and measures (enforcement) rules, 1986 (forshort '1986 rules'). the rules have come into force with effect from 15th july, 1989. it is true that the .....

itel Industries Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT

Reported in : (2004)(93)ECC639

..... - (1). the central government may, by notification in the official gazette, specify any goods, in relation to which it is required, under the provisions of the standard weights & measures act, 1976 (60 of 1976) or the rules made thereunder or under any other law for the time being in force, to declare on the package, ..... it has been accepted by the tribunal. (c) in any case the board's circular is perfectly in tune with the legal provisions of the standard weights & measures act, 1976. rule 2(q) of standard weights & measures (packaged commodities) rules, 1977 defines retail sale as :- "retail sale in relation to a commodity, means the sale, distribution or delivery ..... -2-2002 is against provisions of the law. it has also been contended that as per standards of weights & measures act, 1976 there is no need for sale in retail as per definition of 'retail sale' under rule 2(q) of standard weights & measures (packaged commodities) rules, 1977. telephone sets are specified under section 4a and as .....

Seth Purty and Anr. Vs. State of Jharkhand and Anr.

Court : Jharkhand

..... appliances or apparatus were in possession or under custody or control of the petitioners, notices have been issued against the petitioners and that in view of section 62 of the standard weights and measures (enforcement) act, 198, the company should have also been made accused. it was also submitted that the hon ble supreme court in a recent judgment passed in criminal ..... no. 19 of 2007 whereby and whereunder, cognizance of offence under sections 45, 47 and 48 of the weight and measurement act, 1985, has been taken against the petitioners, the name of the act seems to have been incorrectly recorded in place of standard weights and measures (enforcement) act, 1985 and also prayed for quashing of the entire criminal proceeding in connection with .....

Miraj Products Pvt. Ltd. Vs. C.C.E.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

..... the contention is that as per the provisions of section 4a of central excise act, any notified goods in relation to which it is required under the provisions of standards of weights & measures act, 1977 or the rules made thereunder or in other law or time being enforce to declare on package thereof, the retail sale price of such ..... goods to which the provisions of sub-section 2 shall apply. the contention is that the appellant wrote to the competent authority under the standards of weights & measures act for their liability to affix the maximum retail price on the pouches in which 6 grams of chewing tobacco is packed vide letter dt.4.4 ..... of the commodities is twenty grams or twenty milliliters or less. there is no requirement of mentioning mrp. the contention is that as the authority under the standards of weights & measures act clarified that there is no need to mention the mrp of small pouches containing 6 grams of showing tobacco, therefore, the revenue cannot ask for .....

Bharat Pulverising Mills Limited Madras Vs. the Joint Director of Agri ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : AIR1993Mad74; (1992)IIMLJ511

..... analyst measuring the volume of the insecticide and the report of the analyst is to be sent in form xl it is further alleged that 'weights' and 'measures' are matters governed by the standards of weights and measures act, 1976 (hereinafter referred to as 'the standards act') and the central government, in exercise of the rule making power contained in s. 83 of the ..... , 1977. it is pointed out in the affidavit that it is only the 'director' under the standards act and any person authorised under s. 29 of the standards act who can draw samples and determine the weight of volume (measure) and nobody else can determine the weight or measure. it is also pointed out that theinsecticide analyst is least qualified to determine the measure .....

Cce Vs. Urisan Cosmetics Ltd.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

..... the appellants multi-piece packages having only 9 gms in the multi pack under consideration is clearly exempt from the requirement of declaration of mrp under the standard weights and measures act. in other words, it is not legally obligatory to declare mrp of such packages".cce, daman v. kraftech products inc.dealt with ..... law for the time being in force to declare on the package thereof the maximum retail sale price of such packaged goods.the standards of weights & measures act, 1976 and the standards of weights and measures (packaged commodities) rules, 1977 require the marking of the retail price, batch number etc as prescribed for various commodities. ..... pieces contained in such multi-piece package (if such individual pieces are capable of being sold separately) is statutorily required under rule 17(1) of the standards of weights and measures (packaged commodities) rules, 1977. (ii) that in respect of multi-piece packages of a commodity intended for retail sale and which are notified .....

Kraftech Products Inc. Vs. C.C. Ex.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Reported in : (2004)(173)ELT508Tri(Mum.)bai

..... 10ml. therefore, the appellants' multi-piece packages having only 9gms in the multi pack under consideration is clearly exempt from the requirement of declaration of mrp under standard weight and measures act. in other words, it is not legally obligatory declare mrp of such packages.5. the first proviso to rule 34(b) provides that the ..... provisions of section 4a of the central excise act will not be applicable for ....... of assessment of duty on such packages. rule 34b of the rules under standard and weight and measures act is very clear and unambiguous. the sub-rule (b) thereof, provides that the provisions of the packaged commodities rules will not be applicable ..... .11.1999 which in para 2 and 3 provides as under. the matter has been examined. multi-piece package has been defined under rule 2 of the standards of weights and measures (packaged commodities) rules, 1977 as follows: "multi-piece package" means a package containing two or more individual packaged or labelled pieces of the .....