Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: standards of weights and measures act 1976 section 66 penalty for contravention of section 49 Page 2 of about 193 results (0.120 seconds)

CochIn Refineries Ltd. Vs. State of Kerala and ors.

Court : Kerala

Reported in : AIR2002Ker290

..... was only a misreading of the act that had prompted the statutory authorities to proceed against them in the matter. as regards rule 14{1) of the kerala standards of weights and measures (enforcement) rules, to the extent it provided for, verification and calibration of storage tanks, petitioners submitted that the rule went far beyond the statutory ..... from refinery or ship. this involved a contract and consequent accountability and therefore falls within the ambit of 'transaction' denned in section 2(z) of the standards of weights and measures act, 1976. it had been averred that the products in the storage tanks were drawn and sold to various dealers and this also involved a ..... claim is resisted. it is submitted that the distribution of the products as available in the terminal is a transaction coming within section 2(z) of the standards of weights and measures act. reference is also made to the definition 'sale'. it is pointed out that basic approach to the issue has been erroneous. after the .....

The Manager, Asian Paints (India) Limited Vs. the Inspector of Legal M ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : 2002CriLJ3869; 2002(6)KarLJ481

..... made against the petitioner about violation of sub-rules (6) and (7) of rule 23 of the rules.5. the provision of section 72 of the standards of weights and measures act, 1976 declares that no court shall take cognizance of offence punishable under this act except upon the complaint made by the director or any authorised ..... of the commodity, for example, in the case of common salt, sodium chloride is the generic name; (c) the net quantity, in terms of the standard unit of weight or measure, of the commodity contained in the package or where the commodity is packed or sold by number, the number of the commodity contained in the package ..... chief metropolitan magistrate, bangalore. the inspector of legal metrology has filed a complaint against the petitioner for contravention of rules 4, 6 and 23(1) of the standards of weights and measures (packaged commodities) rules, 1977 (hereinafter referred as the 'rules'). the respondent on 26-4-1997 inspected the shop of one agarwal private limited at .....

B.K.Singh Vs. State of Jharkhand

Court : Jharkhand

..... or apparatus were in possession or under custody or control of the petitioner, notice has been issued to the 2 petitioner and in view of section 62 of the standard weights and measures (enforcement) act, 1985, the company should have also been made accused. it was also submitted that the hon ble supreme court in a recent ..... counsel representing the state relying upon the counter affidavit contended that the petitioner being the division manager of the said company was using weights and measure equipments, which were not as per the prescribed standards of the act, in clear violation of the provisions of the said act and the court below has rightly taken cognizance of the ..... brought to him at such place and within such time and shall, if he is satisfied that such weight or measure conforms to the standards established by or under the standards act, put his stamp thereon: provided that where any weight or measure is such that it cannot, or should not, be moved from its location, the inspector .....

Fao No.170 of 2013 (Oandm) Vs. M/S Ratan Coal Traders Pura Mohalla

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... the appellant on 15.1.2013 is contrary to the record. faced with this situation, counsel for the appellant has vehemently argued that section 26 of the standards of weights & measurement (enforcement) act, 1985 raises a presumption regarding the correctness of the weigh bridge at laksar in favour of the appellant as a certificate of ..... 9.2012 held as under: it is pertinent to mention that admittedly functioning of the weigh bridge in india is governed by the standards of weights & measurement (enforcement) act, 1985. senior inspector, weights& measures, haridwar was the competent authority so far as the functioning of the railway weigh bridge at laksar was concerned and when ..... at every place with the state in which it is stamped unless it is found on inspection or verification that such weight or measure has ceased to conform to the standards established by or under the standards act. a perusal of the aforesaid section would show that the presumption, as argued, is rebuttable. counsel for .....

Mehernosh Randeria Vs. Commissioner of Cus. (Acc),

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

..... single pieces in polythene bag for the purpose of transport and were not in a packaged condition. the question of plugs and sockets therefore being covered by the standard of weights and measures act does not arise as they were not in a packaged condition. the package containing single piece of mccbs was affixed with a label stating, ..... the packaged commodities rules and therefore no mrp was required to be declared. it was also submitted that if the goods are packaged in single pieces, provision of standards of weights and measures (packaged commodities) rules, 1977 do not apply as has been held by the kerala high court in the case of peico electronics & electricals ltd. v ..... and the other mccbs were packed in single piece carrying a declaration as required under rule 34 of the packages rules and were therefore not covered under the standard of weight and measures act as per decision of the keral and andhra pradesh high. court cited by the appellants and the provision of rule 34. there is no .....

M/S. T.T. (Pvt.) Ltd. Vs. Union of India, and Others

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : AIR1991Kant79

..... are filed. as stated earlier the whole object and purpose of the act has been to enact a law not only for the purpose of setting out standards in weights and measures but also to make provisions for the protection of consumers. one of the most important rights of a consumer today, among other rights, is ..... the petitioners that the entire act itself is intended to cover inter-state transactions and not intra-state transactions. in fact, the parliament has enacted another act, the standards of weights & measures (enforcement) act, 1985 (act 54 ot 1985) (hereinafter referred to as the 'enforcement act') and s. 2 thereof which clearly states that that ..... manufacturer, and what is very important, the price of the package. it is also proposed that commodities commonly used by people should be packed in rationalised standard quantities by weight, measure or number, so as to facilitate the purchase and comparison of price by the people. further, indication of date of manufacture and date of expiry .....

Britannia Industries Limited, Being a Company Registered Under the Pro ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2009(5)BomCR76; 2009(111)BomLR3245

..... the mass of the international prototype of the kilogram. section 21 prohibits the use of non-standard weight or measure and is as under: section 21:-use of non-standard weight or measure prohibited ' no weight, measure or numeral, other than the standard weight, measure or numeral shall be used as a standard weight, measure or numeral.section 39 mandates declaration of the quantities and origin of commodities in ..... % free but started marketing their 50-50 biscuits in the packet consisting of 75 grams with additional 25 grams free so as to make total weight of the package to 100 grams which is one of the standard weights mentioned in the iii schedule. however, apprehending further action being taken in respect of the packages wherein 20% has been given free along with .....

Eureka Forbes Limited Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : AIR2003AP275; 2003(2)ALD742

..... , made in the prescribed manner, of- (i) the identity of the commodity in the package; (ii) the net quantity, in terms of the standard unit of weight or measure, of the commodity in the package; (iii) where the commodity is packaged or sold by number, the accurate number of the commodity contained in ..... cleaners manufactured and marked by the petitioner-company are covered by the standards of weights and measures act, 1976, and the standards of weights and measures (packaged commodities) rules, 1977.8. the standards of weights and measures act, 1976 is intended to establish standards of weights and measures, and to provide for other related matters. it is ..... manager at hyderabad filed the writ petition seeking a writ of mandamus declaring that the provisions of standards of weights and measures act, 1976 (central act no.60 of 1976) (hereinafter called the act), and the standards of weights and measures (packaged commodities) rules, 1977 (hereinafter called, the rules) are not applicable to .....

Jayanti Food Processing (P) Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, R ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : 2007(121)ECC1; JT2007(10)SC327; (2007)8SCC34; [2007]10STT375; 2007(2)LC1002(SC)

..... in terms of the mrp. the only exception where a manufacturer can deviate from the general rule of printing of mrp on the package is rule 34 of standards of weights & measures (packaged commodity) rules, 1977.we are afraid the law is too broadly stated here. it may be that chocolates manufactured by the appellant are ..... of the swm act empowers the central government to make rules on the subjects provided in section 83(2). accordingly, the central government framed the rules called 'the standards of weights and measures (packaged commodities) rules, 1977'. as would be suggestive from the title itself, rule 1(3) provided that these rules would apply to the commodities ..... - (1) the central government may, by notification in the official gazette, specify any goods, in relation to which it is required, under the provisions of the standards of weights and measures act, 1976 (60 of 1976) or the rules made thereunder or under any other law for the time being in force, to declare on the package .....

Joint Director of Agriculture (inputs) Directorate of Agriculture, Che ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : 1996CriLJ530

..... such product as a 'mis branded' one under the provisions of the insecticides act, 1968, the reference to the provisions of the other act governing standards of weights and measures and the packaged commodities rules become wholely irrelevant and unnecessary. the reliance placed upon the said rules, in our view, is a mistaken ..... insecticide, the manufacture and sale of which is governed by the insecticides act 1968, the entire procedure of the method of tests prescribed under the standards of weights and measures act 1976 or the packaged commodities rules are attracted and should be dealt with only under those provisions of the act and the rules ..... quantity as stated on the label and that this fact has been recognised and tolerant limits for different kinds of commodities have been prescribed under the standards of weights and measures (packaged commodities) rules 1977. since the explanation of the respondent was not found acceptable and convincing, it was considered that mis-branding .....