Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: standards of weights and measures act 1976 section 66 penalty for contravention of section 49 Page 20 of about 193 results (0.116 seconds)

Turner Vs. Maryland

Court : US Supreme Court

..... 83; 1785, c. 87. many other maryland provincial laws, prescribing the length, superficial and solid measure, weight and capacity of domestic products, are collected on pages 45-47 of the report of mr. j. h. alexander on the standards of weight and measurement in maryland. virginia: laws of va. revisal 1783, pp. 47, 188, 192. pork, ..... of the thirteen american colonies and states in force in 1787, when the constitution of the united states was adopted, that the form, capacity, dimensions, and weight of packages were objects of inspection, irrespective of the quality of the contents of the packages. the instances embrace, among others, the dimensions of shingles, ..... the tobacco be merchantable, to the owner, with a certificate stating the date of inspection, the warehouse mark and number of the hogshead, the weight thereof, and the net weight of the tobacco in it, and that unmerchantable tobacco shall be reconditioned, packed, reweighed, and reinspected, and then sampled and certified, and by .....

German Remedies Ltd. Vs. Cce

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

..... this tribunal in a number of cases that pasting of sticker on imported product to indicate the name of the importer and mrp which is the requirement under the standard of weights and measures act would not attract the chapter note. the tribunal has further held that imply putting the sticker does not amount to labeling or re-labeling, reprocessing, ..... products (i)pvt. ltd -2002 (53) rlt 917 wherein it has been held that affixing a sticker indicating name of importer and mrp as per requirement under standards of weight and measurements act does not amount to labeling/re-labeling and does not amount to manufacture in terms of note 4 to chapter 33 of the tariff. he also mentioned ..... it is mentioned in the impugned order that description given in the bills of entry was "somatosan 3 mg" and the quantity shown in nos. 750 and the net weight as 9 kgs; that it is nowhere mentioned in the bill of entry that the goods were in smaller cartons and further packed in bigger cartons, that the invoice .....

Assam Roller Flour Mills Association and ors. Vs. State of Assam and o ...

Court : Guwahati

..... sale as have taken place but on the market retail price of the goods declared on the package as per the provision of the standards of weights and measures act, 1976 or the rules framed thereunder or any other law for the time being in force which is chargeable only at ..... prescribed rules of behaviours are strictly observed.in fact, the sale of agricultural produce involves a number of functions such as assembling, storing, grading, standardizing transporting and financing the producer and negotiating the sale. the individual producer does not have the specialized knowledge and adequate resource to perform all these functions ..... inconformity with the prescribed rules of behaviour. as the sale of agricultural produce involves a number of activities, such as assembling, storing, grading, weighment, standardization, transport and financing, the individual producers bereft of specialized knowledge and adequate resources to the above effect, are usually grossly disadvantaged. the provisions of the .....

Mulluk Chand Mollah Vs. Surendra Nath Majumdar

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : AIR1957Cal217

..... 161 (c), the covenant was to pay 100/- and interest by equal half yearly instalments 'in sterling in gold coin of the united kingdom of or equal to the standard of weight and fineness existing on september, 1, 1928''. the contention of the promisor was that the agreement was to pay fixed sums in sterling in one particular form of legal tender ..... , 4th edition,'page 242). 14. in 1934 ac 161 at 172 (c), lord russell observed: 'the parties are referring to gold coin of the united kingdom of a specific standard of weight and fineness not as being the mode in which the company's indebtedness is to be discharged, but as being the means by which the amount of that indebtedness is .....

itc Limited Kolkata and Others Vs. State of Karnataka Rep. by Principa ...

Court : Karnataka

..... the said notification. (2) the goods to be specified under sub-/section (1) shall be those in relation to which it is required under the provision of the standards of weights and measures act, 1976 (central act 60 of 1976) or the rule made being thereunder or under any other law for the time being in force, to declare on ..... the transaction that is the subject of tax. it cannot be said that once sale has taken place which attracts tax, it can be levied and measured on any standard divorced from the subject of sale. 193. permitting this means permitting legislation to insert one or other of the essential ingredients of sale by creating legal fiction, which in ..... of goods act, 1930, the price ......................remains an integral part of sale which becomes subjects of tax and the levy cannot be divorced therefrom where price and not the weight of goods is the measure of tax. 208. if sections 4a is designed to bring a levy into existence which is divorced from the sale subject to tax under .....

A. Ayyasamy Vs. A. Paramasivam and Ors

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... the view of this court, the dispute between the parties was clearly referable to the terms of the contract and did not entrench upon the legislative provisions contained in the standards of weights and measures (enforcement) act, 1985: the courts below in our opinion, have committed an error by misreading the terms of the contract when they came to the conclusion that ..... and the high court in revision affirmed the view. the submission which weighed with the high court was that the allegation of tampering of weights and of measurement seals could only be adjudicated upon under the standards of weights and measures (enforcement) act, 1985 and hence such a dispute was not arbitrable. this court held that once the arbitration agreement was admitted, in .....

Parle Products Private Limited Vs. Parle Agro Private Limited

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2009(3)BomCR379; 2009(2)MhLj314

..... labels need also not to be restrained. however, in line with the directions passed in ramdev food products (supra) with regard to the statutory obligations of the defendant under standard of weights and measures act and the prevention of food adulteration act, the defendant shall mention the following on the labels for the products henceforth manufactured by the defendant:'.'followed by the ..... marketed by the name of his firm showing his group with the addition of the words 'having no relationship whatsoever with' the plaintiff-company. this was in consonance with the standards of weights and measures act and prevention of food adulteration act.26. the judgment in the case of ramdev food product's (supra) squarely governs the rights and entitlements of the .....

Lal International Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in : (2003)(87)ECC209

..... , submitted that the appellants imported chocolates for marketing in india without undertaking any process under the foreign brand name already affixed on the chocolates; that in terms of provisions of standards of weights and measures (packing of commodities) rules, they have to affix the sticker on the imported chocolates containing the statutory stipulations namely, name and address and maximum retail price; that ..... case, admittedly are only pasting the sticker on the packing of the imported soap to indicate the name of the importer and the mrp which is the requirement under the standards of weights and measures act. simply putting a sticker, in our views, will neither amount to labelling or re-labelling, the processes which have been deemed to be a process of .....

Glaxo Smithkline Pharmaceuticals Ltd. Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... is the submission of the learned additional solicitor general that the relabeling is permitted under law. earlier, issue of printing prices was governed by the standards of weights and measures act, 1976. now it is governed by legal metrology act, 2009. legal metrology (packaged commodities) rules, 2011 (for short, ..... dpco as under: 2. (a) bulk drug means any pharmaceutical, chemical, biological or plant product including its salts, esters, stereo-isomers and derivatives, conforming to pharmacopoeial or other standards specified in the second schedule to the drugs and cosmetics act, 1940(23 of 1940), and which is used as such or as an ingredient in any formulation; . . . ..... /distributor. it is true that the principle of contemporanea expositio guides that contemporaneous administrative construction, unless clearly wrong, should be given considerable weight and should not be lightly overturned but in light of the construction of the relevant provisions indicated by us above, the view in the .....

Pacific India Trade Concern Vs. Commissioner of Customs (Prev)

Court : Delhi

..... been declared on the' individual packages. according to para 5 of the general notes of foreign trade policy, when packaged commodities in respect of which the provisions of standards of weights and measures act, 1976 cusaa62014 page 2 and the rules made thereunder are applicable, the mrp at which the goods are to be sold in packaged form to ..... be sold had been declared for the purpose of additional customs duty. paragraph 5 of the general notes of the foreign trade policy and the provisions of the standards of weights and measures act, 1976 required that the price at which the goods were to be sold in india and at which the consumers ultimately offered the same had ..... search and seizure was illegal. it was also argued that the customs or central excise authorities are not entitled to re-fix the price by applying the other standards.5. this court notices in this case that the proprietor of the assessee had made a statement under section 108 admitting that the items imported were covered under .....