Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: standards of weights and measures act 1976 section 66 penalty for contravention of section 49 Page 9 of about 193 results (0.129 seconds)

Jan 25 2007 (HC)

The Deputy Commissioner of Commercial Taxes (Vigilance) Vs. Hindustan ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : (2007)10VST330(Karn); 2007(4)KCCRSN253; 2007(3)AIRKarR29; 2007-08(5)VATToday33(DB)

..... regard to dharwad tea and non-dharwad tea. same is reflected in the books of accounts. the company is governed by the standards of weights and measures act, 1976 and rules. rule 6 read with rule 2(r) of the standards of weights and measures (packaged commodities) rules, 1977 requires that the sale price of the package commodity shall be printed on the packages .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 11 2006 (HC)

Ram Chander Vs. State of Haryana and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : (2006)144PLR392

..... litigation, wherein apart from challenging allotments of liquor vends, an action is sought for not prescribing maximum retail price for sale of liquor in accordance with the provisions of the standards of weights and measures act, 1976. since common questions are involved, all the petitions are disposed of by a common order.2. facts brought on record are that the state of ..... point raised in category iii cases is that a direction ought to be issued to respondent no. 3 to fix maximum retail price of liquor as per provisions of the standards of weights and measures act, 1976.16. we have heard the matter at length.the questions which arise for consideration are:i) whether conversion of country liquor quota into imfl and .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 08 2007 (HC)

Atlas Cycles (Haryana) Ltd. Vs. Atlas Products Pvt. Ltd.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 146(2008)DLT274; LC2007(3)57; 2008(36)PTC269(Del)

..... such articles on the labels/pouches on the reverse thereof, the following shall be mentioned in the minimum permissible size in terms of the provisions of the standards of weights and measures act and the prevention of food adulteration act:this product is manufactured and marketed by m/s. ramdev masala (arvindbhai group) having no relationship ..... would have come to a contrary conclusion. however, in this case the courts below proceeded on a prima facie misconstruction of documents. they adopted and applied wrong standards. we, thereforee, are of the opinion that a case for interference has been made out.8. the operative part of the impugned order dated 27.9.2002 ..... respect of such articles on the labels/pouches, on the reverse thereof, the following shall be mentioned in the minimum permissible size in terms of the provisions of weights and measures act and prevention of food adulteration act:this product is manufactured and marketed by m/s. ramdev masala (arvindbhai group) (or m/s. ramdev .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 08 2009 (SC)

State of Himachal Pradesh Vs. NaraIn Singh

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : JT2009(9)SC265; 2009(9)SCALE326; 2009AIRSCW5984; 2009(4)LHSC2552

..... of the land records maintained in each revenue estate within manageable size, it has become essential to create more estates or sub-estates. apart from this, with the enactment the standards of weights and measures act, 1976, it is now mandatory to convert the non-metric measurements into metric measurements. due to different scales of measurements prevalent in various parts of the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 11 2003 (SC)

The Secretary, Thirumurugan Co-operative Agricultural Credit Society V ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2004SC448; 2004(5)ALLMR(SC)108; [2004]118CompCas253(SC); (2004)1CompLJ339(SC); 2004(2)MhLj581; (2004)2MLJ94(SC); 2004MPLJ242(SC); 2003(10)SCALE635; (2004)1SCC305; 2004(1

..... check adulterated and substandard articles in the market. despite various other statutes such as indian contract act, 1972, sale of goods act, 1930, the indian penal code, 1960. the standard of weights and measures act, 1976 and the motor vehicles act, 1938 etc. being in operation, very little could be achieved in the field of consumer protection. though the mrtp act 1969 and ..... protect the rights of consumers such as protection against marketing of goods which are hazardous to life and property; the right to be informed about the quality, quantity, potency, purity, standard and price of goods to protect the consumer against unfair trade practices; the right to be assured, wherever possible, access to an authority of goods at competitive prices; the right .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 26 2011 (HC)

B.S. Ajith Kumar and Others Vs. State of Kerala and Others

Court : Kerala

..... with the rules. in this connection, i also note that the parliament has now enacted a new act viz., the legal metrology act, 2009, repealing the standards of weights and measures (enforcement) act, 1985. the government of india has already framed central rules viz., the legal metrology (general) rules, 2011, in r.28 ..... inspector, legal metrology in relaxation of the qualification stipulated in the enforcement rules. (iii) to declare that ext. p7 special rules are ultra vires the standards of weights and measures (enforcement) act, 1985 and violative of s.72 of the act and hence null and void to the extent of repugnancy. (iv) to ..... minimum qualification of graduation was made compulsory for appointment to the post of inspector. the government of kerala later promulgated the kerala standards of weights and measures (enforcement) rules, 1992 under the kerala standards of weights and measures (enforcement) act, 1985, which came into force subsequently as per s.72(1) of which, the state .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 23 2015 (HC)

Bridgestone India Pvt. Ltd. Vs. UOI and Others

Court : Delhi

..... commencement of this act, into any contract or other agreement (not being a contract or other agreement for export) in which any weight, measure or number is expressed in terms of any standard other than the standard weight or measure, shall be punished with fine which may extend to two thousand rupees, and, for the second or subsequent offence, ..... sold or kept, offered or exposed for sale, in the state. 29. section 39 of the act of 1985 provides for penalty for keeping non standard weights and measures for use and for other contravention. sections 33 and 39 of the act of 1985 are reproduced as below:- section 33 - provisions of the ..... in packaged form" shall have the meaning assigned to it in the standards act and shall include a pre-packed commodity section 39 - penalty for keeping non-standard weights or measures for use and for other contravention (1) whoever keeps any weight or measure other than the standard weight or measure in any premises in such circumstances as to indicate that .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 15 1999 (TRI)

M/S. Sona Paper Boards Limited Vs. M/S. Weigh Masters

Court : Union Territory Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission UT Chandigarh

..... purpose. the facts and circumstances were thus distinguishable. 6. the main plea of the learned counsel for the complainants is that under section 22 of the standards of weights and measures (enforcement) act, 1985 the respondent should not have sold the weigh-bridge unless it has been verified and stamped and as per the provision ..... the responsibility of the respondent to get it stamped from the competent authority. section 22 of the standard of weights and measures (enforcement) act, 1985 is reproduced as under : 22. prohibition of sale or use of unstamped weights or measures no weight or measures shall be sold or offered, exposed or possessed for sale, or used or kept ..... has been verified and stamped : provided that nothing in this section shall apply to any weight or measures which has been initially verified and stamped with a special seal referred to in sub-section (3) of section 41 of the standards act. a perusal of the aforesaid provision of the act shows that it was statutory .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 12 2005 (HC)

Action Committee for Resolving Gujarat Salt Manufactures Vs. Union of ...

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : (2005)1GLR889

..... 2001 the authority for verification and its functioning would be with the state officers.29. on the question of power of respondent no. 6 to enforce the provisions of standard weights and measures (enforcement) act, i find that it would not be proper by this court to conclude since a substantive writ petition preferred by the railway administration is ..... route weigh bridge of railway can be said as one of the electronic weigh bridges which would be included in the standard weights and measures (enforcement) act and since the authority found that there is difference of weights the seals were applied and he further submitted that even if the said weigh-bridge is sought to be included w. ..... as such the weigh bridge was in order and he further submitted that en route weigh bridge for railway wagons was not even included in the schedule of the standard of weights and measures (enforcement) act, 1985 and he submitted that the same is included now as per the notification dated 25.7.2001 w.e.f. 23.10 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 24 2004 (HC)

The Commissioner of Proh. and Excise, Government of A.P. and ors. Vs. ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2004(6)ALD403; 2004(6)ALT76

..... no declaration as to the sale price has to be made on any bottle containing alcoholic beverages or spirituous liquor.55. that for the purpose of the standards of weights and measures act, 1976, such a declaration may not be necessary but the rules 1970 and rules 1993 mandate incorporation of rmrp on the label fixed on ..... of the writ petitioners, much less any guaranteed fundamental rights.53. the submission based on the standards of weights and measures (packaged commodities) rules, 1977, (for short 'weights and measures rules, 1977') is equally untenable and unsustainable.rule 6 of the weights and measures rules, 1977, provides that every package shall bear thereon or on a label securely fixed ..... not put in issue.56. be it as it may, with effect from 01-12-2003 even rule 6 (c)(iii) is amended and even under the weights and measures rules, 1977, now there is mandatory requirement to indicate the retail price on every bottle contained alcoholic liquor and spirituous liquor. there is no need to .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //