Something - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: something Year: 1996 Page 1 of about 300 results (0.068 seconds)Mafatlal Industries Ltd. and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Dec-19-1996
Reported in: 2002(83)ECC85; 1997(89)ELT247(SC); JT1996(11)SC283; 1996(9)SCALE457; (1997)5SCC536; [1996]Supp10SCR585; [1998]111STC467(SC)
..... not conclusive generally speaking every manufacturer will sell his goods at something above the cost price plus duty there may be a ..... would step outside its jurisdiction it would turn its inquiry into something not directed by parliament and fail to make the inquiry ..... manufacturer does after payment of tax if the manufacturer has done something unlawful steps must be taken against him if this court .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTGajraj Singh Etc. Vs. the State Transport Appellate Tribunal and Other ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Sep-12-1996
Reported in: 1996VIIAD(SC)490; AIR1997SC412; JT1996(8)SC356; 1996(7)SCALE31; (1997)1SCC650; [1996]Supp6SCR172
..... or obligation for another of the same nature a change of something old to something new to grant or obtain extension of 34 in p ramanatha ..... renewal is defined at page 1107 to mean a change of something old for something new the renewal of a license means a new license ..... as a reality therefore in case of legal fiction the court believes something to exist which in reality does not exist it is nothing .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTThe Management of the Divisional Forest Officer (Kl), Sambalpur Kendu ...
Court: Orissa
Decided on: Feb-29-1996
Reported in: 1996(I)OLR470
..... a thing is incidental to another if it merely appertains to something else as primary such thing should not be extraneous or contrary ..... likely to happen as a result of or in connection with something more important being an incidental casual hence secondary or minor but usually ..... of reference was non existent and that the true dispute was something else 4 the controversy can also be looked at from another angle .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTExecutive Engineer, Kseb Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu
Decided on: Nov-14-1996
Reported in: (1997)(92)ELT264Tri(Chennai)
..... suppression of facts with intention to evade payment of duty something positive other than inaction is required to establish suppression of ..... held in the circumstances of the manufacture of goods unless something positive is shown that the appellants have withheld information with ..... assessee we observe that it is one thing to attribute something in the show cause notice but another thing to upheld .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTDr. Sarosh H. Kanga and Mrs. Piroja Vs. Assistant Controller of Estate
Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Pune
Decided on: Sep-06-1996
Reported in: (1997)60ITD356(Pune.)
..... order must cause him a legal grievance by wrongfully depriving him of something under section 246 any person who really is aggrieved by the ..... required to establish that he has been denied or deprived of something to which he is legally entitled to in order to make ..... order must cause a person legal grievance by wrongfully depriving him of something it is no doubt a legal grievance and not a grievance .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTJavid Ahmed Shah and Etc. Vs. Principal, Dr. B.R. Ambedkar Medical Col ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Feb-07-1996
Reported in: ILR1996KAR2434; 1996(3)KarLJ603
..... trust and that the action taken by the principal is something within the internal management of the affairs of that trust ..... state the learned advocates have submitted that the incident itself was something that took place within the college premises and merely because ..... the discretion with regard to the gravity of punishment is something within the province of the authority which passes an order .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTWorkmen, Manipal Power Press Vs. P.O. Industrial Tribunal
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jun-06-1996
Reported in: (1998)IIILLJ258Kant
..... mentioned in the order of reference was non existent and that the true dispute was something else under section 10 4 of the act it is not competent to the tribunal ..... or associated with the dispute the dispute is the fundamental thing while something incidental thereto is an adjunct to it something incidental therefore cannot cut at the root of the main thing to .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTWorkmen of Manipal Power Press Vs. Presiding Officer, Industrial Tribu ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jun-03-1996
Reported in: ILR1997KAR448
..... mentioned in the order of reference was non existent and that the true dispute was something else under section 10 4 of the act it is not competent to the tribunal ..... or associated with the dispute the dispute is the fundamental thing while something incidental thereto is an adjunct to it something incidental therefore cannot cut at the root of the main thing to .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCommissioner of Income-tax Vs. Lucky Mineral Pvt. Ltd.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Feb-27-1996
Reported in: (1996)134CTR(Raj)541; [1997]226ITR245(Raj)
..... labour or manipulation in order to make a change amount to manufacture something more is necessary and that something more is such transformation of a production as brings into existence a ..... result of treatment labour and manipulation to bring about the change qualifyingas manufacture something more is necessary and that something is transformation i e a new and different article having a distinct .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSmithaben H. Patel and Others Vs. Industrial Credit and Development Sy ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Sep-30-1996
..... has been spread over a period of about four years and something like 48 instalments have been paid the respondents have also ..... the direction was accepted and therefore if the accounts department did something to the contrary it was procedurally incorrect to this extent ..... continued to make the payments accompanying such a mandate for something like four years it is therefore not a question of .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial