Something - Judgment Search Results

Carondelet Canal and Navigation Co. Vs. Louisiana

Court: US Supreme Court

..... the provision under discussion it stands in the place of something that is to revert to the state and following therefore ..... state without compensation made in the other contingency there was something more then than a prospective railroad for it to relate ..... the antecedent looked for but significantly determining it to be something else than the railroad which was but a subordinate instrument .....

Bank of Scotland Vs. Liquidators of Hutchison, Main, and Co., Limited

Court: House of Lords

..... reached the hands of the agents but that only shows that something remained to be done which the appellants could not do ..... carve out of their property in the debenture this partial interest something in addition should be done which would in contemplation of ..... the doctrine of converting a promise to assign or transfer into something which effects a transmutation of real ownership by the debtor into .....

Foote and Co., Inc. Vs. Stanley

Court: US Supreme Court

..... that the amount of inspection fees are disproportionate to the inspection service rendered or include something beyond inspection the tax must be declared void as obstructing the freedom of interstate commerce ..... the fees are disproportionate to the service rendered or that they include the cost of something beyond legitimate inspection to determine quality and condition the tax must be declared void .....

Muthukaruppa Mudali and ors. Vs. Pi. Mu. Kathappudayan and ors.

Court: Chennai

Reported in: AIR1915Mad528; (1914)27MLJ249

..... 2 when at the desire of the promisor the promisee has done something such act is called a consideration i extract only that part ..... abstains from doing or promises to do or to abstain from doing something such act or abstinence or promise is called a consideration for ..... widest possible words but it has been always held that the something which the promisee has done cannot be a merely illusory thing .....

Thangavelu Pillai and Purshottam Reddi Vs. Doraisami Pillai and anr.

Court: Chennai

Reported in: AIR1915Mad113; (1914)27MLJ272

..... was really decided on the ground that a co parcener cannot relinquish his share unless something trifling at least was given to him as consideration having carefully read that judgment i ..... that even a co parcener who does not desire to take a share must have something given him at the time of the partition and then the learned judges refer to .....

United States Vs. First National Bank of Detroit

Court: US Supreme Court

..... is to be adopted as the legislative meaning in the absence of clear showing that something else was meant the rule that words in treaties with and statutes affecting indians must ..... is to be adopted as the legislative meaning in the absence of clear showing that something else was meant is an elementary rule of construction frequently recognized and followed in this .....

Emperor Vs. Upendra Nath Das

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: AIR1915Cal778,30Ind.Cas.113

..... non direction is not necessarily misdirection those who allege misdirection must show that something wrong was said or that something was said which would make wrong that which was left to be .....

Ram Ranjan Roy Vs. Emperor

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: AIR1915Cal545,(1915)ILR42Cal422

..... mid hardly accords with the connected actions of responsible human beings there is obviously something kept back something omitted which is required to link up the narrative and to present a reasonable .....

Balmer Lawrie and Co. Vs. Jadunath Banerjee

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: AIR1915Cal658,(1915)ILR42Cal1

..... such thing mookerjee j 15 suppose the assets brought into court are paddy is that something available for immediate distribution 16 no the decree sought to be executed must be one ..... 76 the government promissory notes and the cheque were brought into court but there was something more to be done under order xxi rule 76 the endorsement of the government promissory .....

Muruga Goundan Alias Ayyam Pettaiyan Vs. Emperor

Court: Chennai

Reported in: AIR1915Mad56; 25Ind.Cas.351

..... no 5 it would appear probable though by no means certain that the jaggery contained something in the nature of a love philtre designed to secure the affections of the boy ..... 5 is opposed to such a supposition it may be that this love philtre contained something which disagreed with the boy and ultimately caused his death but there is nothing from .....