Something - Judgment Search Results

Rookes (A.P.) Vs. Barnard and Others

Court: House of Lords

..... between what is lawful and unlawful as against the party threatened if the defendant threatens something that that party cannot legally resist the plaintiff likewise cannot be allowed to resist the ..... of conditions in which the persistent reader after wading through the verbiage could not find something to protect the carrier against any loss 8230 wheresoever or whensoever occurring and condition 19 .....

Burmah Oil Co. (Burma Trading) Ltd. Vs. Lord Advocate

Court: House of Lords

..... une n cessit in vitable his examples show that he means something dictated by the dispositions of the opposing forces it may ..... perhaps constitutional propriety argue against it but first i must say something about two lines of reference extraneous to our own common law ..... is logical enough to consider that when the act deals with something which before the act could be effected by the prerogative .....

In the Matter Of: Under Article 143 of the Constitution of India

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1965SC745

..... of the courts of law in respect of that committal is something which the house of commons had because it was a superior ..... privilege a term which has been used in the sense of something which the parliament possessed and which exceeded those possessed by other ..... primarily exists are subject of fundamental rights it is curious that something which is ancillary to that primary function should be free of them .....

Acharya D.V. Pande Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax

Court: Gujarat

Reported in: AIR1965Guj262; [1965]56ITR152(Guj)

..... said that that word in its ordinary meaning appeared to denote something acquired which the acquirer becomes possessed of and can dispose of ..... s worth they made it clear that what they meant was something which could be turned to pecuniary account 13 the learned advocate ..... same cannot be said to represent moneys s worth i e something which can be turned to pecnuniary account the question whether the .....

Ram Surat Singh Vs. Rent Control and Eviction Officer and anr.

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: AIR1965All49

..... cairns appears to me to be incomplete in one respect there may be something in the nature of the donee of the power which may show that ..... 1880 5 ac 214 but there may be something in the nature of the thing empowered to be done something in the object for which it is to ..... be done something in the conditions under which it is to be done something in the title of the person or .....

L. Kunji Lal Gupta Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: AIR1964All457

..... increment of value in the investment but a gain a profit something of exchangeable value proceeding from the property severed from the capital ..... the question however unfortunately for the assessee is not that but something totally different to which blott s case 1921 8 tax cas ..... or acquired by a share holder from the company it is something which he receives gratis they however do not fall from heaven .....

Kunjilal Gupta Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax, U.P.

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: [1964]52ITR27(All)

..... increment of value in the investment but a gin a profit something of exchangeable value proceeding from the property severed from the ..... the question however unfortunately for the assessee is not that but something totally different to which blotts case does not furnish any ..... purchased or acquired by a shareholder from the company it is something which he receives gratis they however do not fall from .....

Ranjit D. Udeshi Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1965SC881; 1965(67)BLJR506; 1965CriLJ8; [1965]1SCR65

..... place an almost impenetrable defence in the hands of offenders something much less than actual knowledge must therefore suffice it is ..... statute as the word obscene has been interpreted by english courts something may be said of that interpretation first the common law ..... and literature cannot be regarded as evidence of obscenity without something more it is not necessary that the angles and saints .....

Labor Board Vs. Fruit Packers

Court: US Supreme Court

..... not run afoul of constitutional limitations this court has long recognized that picketing is inseparably something more than and different from simple communication hughes v superior court 339 u s 460 ..... the social desirability of limiting a form of communication likely to have effects caused by something apart from the message communicated are entitled to great deference the decision of congress to .....

Pullareddigari Venkatasubba Reddi and ors. Vs. Pullareddigari Peddasub ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: AIR1964AP458

..... in the way of the document taking effect since it contemplates only something being done in future 8 it is laid down in ramanarasu ..... 56 mad 198 air 1933 mad 28 that a promise to do something in future is legal consideration and there is no legal impediment ..... decree holder accepting a mere promise that the judgment debtor will do something at some future date as a legal and immediate adjustment in .....