Skip to content
How to use Narrow results with filters
  1. Run a keyword search first to load the results page.
  2. Select Supreme Court, a High Court, or tribunal on the left.
  3. Optionally filter by decision year to focus on recent or historical cases.

Senior Counsel - Judgment Search Results

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Oct 20 1994

Rajiv K. Garg and Others Vs. Shanti Bhushan, Senior Advocate and Other ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Oct-20-1994

Reported in: AIR1995SC573; 1995(1)ALT(Cri)245; 1995(1)KLT25(SC); 1994(4)SCALE635; (1995)1SCC3; [1994]Supp4SCR642; (1995)1UPLBEC199

as litigants tend to scandalise the Court and interfere with due course of justice.3. We have heard learned Counsel. It is a matter of deep regret that there should have been any cause for such an unfortunate


May 27 1954

In Re: Mr. 'G', A Senior Advocate of the Supreme Court

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: May-27-1954

Reported in: 1954(2)BLJR477; (1954)56BOMLR1220; [1955]1SCR490

Bose, J.1. This matter arises out of a summons issued to Mr. G, a Senior Advocate of this Court under Order IV, rule 30, of the Supreme Court Rules, to show cause why … Bose, J.1. This matter arises out of a summons issued to Mr. G, a Senior Advocate of this Court under Order IV, rule 30, of the Supreme Court Rules, to show cause why disciplinary


May 27 1954

Mr. 'G', A Senior Advocate of the Supreme Court Vs. the Hon'ble Chief ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: May-27-1954

Reported in: AIR1954SC560; 1954(2)BLJR481; (1954)56BOMLR1221; 1954CriLJ1417; [1955]1SCR501

Matched in: Parties Mr. 'G', A Senior Advocate of the Supreme Court Vs. the Hon'ble Chief Justice and Judges of the High Court of Judicature at Bombay (27.05.1954 - SC)


18-section briefs on any result in this list

Nov 17 2014

Mr. Akshay Bhan Senior Advocate With Vs. Hem Raj and Others …respond ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Nov-17-2014

Nos.1 to 4. Mr.Deepak Sharma, Advocate, for respondent Nos.5 to 7. Mr.B.S.Sidhu, Advocate, for respondent No.8. Mr.Akshay Bhan, Senior Advocate, with Mr.Sumeet Abrol and Mr.A.R.Talwar, Advocates, for the applicant/auction purchaser. HEMANT GUPTA, J. (ORAL) The instant application … properties at serial Nos.2, 6 and 7 was considered and a copy thereof was handed over to learned counsel for the respondent-employees. No objection has been received from any quarter against the said auction. No other higher


Nov 17 2014

Mr. Akshay Bhan Senior Advocate With Vs. Hem Raj and Others …respond ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Nov-17-2014

Nos.1 to 4. Mr.Deepak Sharma, Advocate, for respondent Nos.5 to 7. Mr.B.S.Sidhu, Advocate, for respondent No.8. Mr.Akshay Bhan, Senior Advocate, with Mr.Sumeet Abrol and Mr.A.R.Talwar, Advocates, for the applicant/auction purchaser. HEMANT GUPTA, J. (ORAL) The instant application … properties at serial Nos.2, 6 and 7 was considered and a copy thereof was handed over to learned counsel for the respondent-employees. No objection has been received from any quarter against the said auction. No other higher


Nov 17 2014

Mr. Akshay Bhan Senior Advocate With Vs. Hem Raj and Others …respond ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Nov-17-2014

Nos.1 to 4. Mr.Deepak Sharma, Advocate, for respondent Nos.5 to 7. Mr.B.S.Sidhu, Advocate, for respondent No.8. Mr.Akshay Bhan, Senior Advocate, with Mr.Sumeet Abrol and Mr.A.R.Talwar, Advocates, for the applicant/auction purchaser. HEMANT GUPTA, J. (ORAL) The instant application … properties at serial Nos.2, 6 and 7 was considered and a copy thereof was handed over to learned counsel for the respondent-employees. No objection has been received from any quarter against the said auction. No other higher


Sep 01 2008

M.S. Padmarajaiah, Senior Advocate Vs. the Secretary, Department of Fi ...

Court: Karnataka

Decided on: Sep-01-2008

Reported in: ILR2009KAR2437; [2009]183TAXMAN209(Kar); 2008(4)KCCR2801; 2008AIHC236(Kar)

The brief facts leading to the filing of this writ petition are as under:The petitioner who is a Senior Advocate of the Bar, holding a P P F Account No. 0154 (one of the specified Savings under … 2005-2006 came to an end on 31.3.2006. There is no interim order in favour of the petitioner. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submitted that as per Section 80-C of the Income Tax Act as amended by the


Aug 25 2005

K.M. Vijayan, Senior Advocate Vs. State of Tamil Nadu Represented by I ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Aug-25-2005

Reported in: AIR2005Mad408; 2005(4)CTC337; (2006)3MLJ684

Similar averments have been made in the other writ petitions questioning lifetime tax.5. Heard Mr. K.M. Vijayan, learned Senior Counsel, appearing in person, Mr. R. Natesan, and M. Krishnappan, learned counsel for petitioners and Mr. N.R. Chandran, learned … life time tax based on the value of vehicles.20. It is the claim of Mr. K.M. Vijayan, learned senior counsel as well as Mr. Natesan, learned counsel for some of the petitioners, that though an argument was advanced


Nov 21 2012

Present: Mr. Kanwaljit Singh Senior Advocate with Vs. Kawal Singh Sehr ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Nov-21-2012

of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 challenging the orders dated 25.9.2012 (Annexure P-2) and 9.10.2012 (Annexure P-4).Learned senior counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner be granted one opportunity to cross examine the complainant. Complainant … to cross examine the complainant on the date fixed before the trial Court i.e.29.11.2012. After hearing the learned senior counsel for the petitioner, I am of the opinion that the instant petition deserves to be allowed. In case


Nov 21 2012

Unknown Vs. Shri S.P. Singh, Learned Senior Counsel with Shri P.S.

Court: Madhya Pradesh

Decided on: Nov-21-2012

ashok kumar versus state of m.p.W.P.No.4287/2011 21/11/2012 Shri V.K.Shukla, learned counsel for the petitioner. Shri B.P.Pandey, learned Dy. Govt. Adv.for the respondents. Petitioner has filed this writ petition challenging


  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »
Loading chart…

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial