Senior Counsel - Judgment Search Results
Rajiv K. Garg and Others Vs. Shanti Bhushan, Senior Advocate and Other ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Oct-20-1994
Reported in: AIR1995SC573; 1995(1)ALT(Cri)245; 1995(1)KLT25(SC); 1994(4)SCALE635; (1995)1SCC3; [1994]Supp4SCR642; (1995)1UPLBEC199
as litigants tend to scandalise the Court and interfere with due course of justice.3. We have heard learned Counsel. It is a matter of deep regret that there should have been any cause for such an unfortunate
In Re: Mr. 'G', A Senior Advocate of the Supreme Court
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: May-27-1954
Reported in: 1954(2)BLJR477; (1954)56BOMLR1220; [1955]1SCR490
Bose, J.1. This matter arises out of a summons issued to Mr. G, a Senior Advocate of this Court under Order IV, rule 30, of the Supreme Court Rules, to show cause why … Bose, J.1. This matter arises out of a summons issued to Mr. G, a Senior Advocate of this Court under Order IV, rule 30, of the Supreme Court Rules, to show cause why disciplinary
Mr. 'G', A Senior Advocate of the Supreme Court Vs. the Hon'ble Chief ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: May-27-1954
Reported in: AIR1954SC560; 1954(2)BLJR481; (1954)56BOMLR1221; 1954CriLJ1417; [1955]1SCR501
Matched in: Parties Mr. 'G', A Senior Advocate of the Supreme Court Vs. the Hon'ble Chief Justice and Judges of the High Court of Judicature at Bombay (27.05.1954 - SC)
18-section briefs on any result in this list
Mr. Akshay Bhan Senior Advocate With Vs. Hem Raj and Others …respond ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Nov-17-2014
Nos.1 to 4. Mr.Deepak Sharma, Advocate, for respondent Nos.5 to 7. Mr.B.S.Sidhu, Advocate, for respondent No.8. Mr.Akshay Bhan, Senior Advocate, with Mr.Sumeet Abrol and Mr.A.R.Talwar, Advocates, for the applicant/auction purchaser. HEMANT GUPTA, J. (ORAL) The instant application … properties at serial Nos.2, 6 and 7 was considered and a copy thereof was handed over to learned counsel for the respondent-employees. No objection has been received from any quarter against the said auction. No other higher
Mr. Akshay Bhan Senior Advocate With Vs. Hem Raj and Others …respond ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Nov-17-2014
Nos.1 to 4. Mr.Deepak Sharma, Advocate, for respondent Nos.5 to 7. Mr.B.S.Sidhu, Advocate, for respondent No.8. Mr.Akshay Bhan, Senior Advocate, with Mr.Sumeet Abrol and Mr.A.R.Talwar, Advocates, for the applicant/auction purchaser. HEMANT GUPTA, J. (ORAL) The instant application … properties at serial Nos.2, 6 and 7 was considered and a copy thereof was handed over to learned counsel for the respondent-employees. No objection has been received from any quarter against the said auction. No other higher
Mr. Akshay Bhan Senior Advocate With Vs. Hem Raj and Others …respond ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Nov-17-2014
Nos.1 to 4. Mr.Deepak Sharma, Advocate, for respondent Nos.5 to 7. Mr.B.S.Sidhu, Advocate, for respondent No.8. Mr.Akshay Bhan, Senior Advocate, with Mr.Sumeet Abrol and Mr.A.R.Talwar, Advocates, for the applicant/auction purchaser. HEMANT GUPTA, J. (ORAL) The instant application … properties at serial Nos.2, 6 and 7 was considered and a copy thereof was handed over to learned counsel for the respondent-employees. No objection has been received from any quarter against the said auction. No other higher
M.S. Padmarajaiah, Senior Advocate Vs. the Secretary, Department of Fi ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Sep-01-2008
Reported in: ILR2009KAR2437; [2009]183TAXMAN209(Kar); 2008(4)KCCR2801; 2008AIHC236(Kar)
The brief facts leading to the filing of this writ petition are as under:The petitioner who is a Senior Advocate of the Bar, holding a P P F Account No. 0154 (one of the specified Savings under … 2005-2006 came to an end on 31.3.2006. There is no interim order in favour of the petitioner. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submitted that as per Section 80-C of the Income Tax Act as amended by the
K.M. Vijayan, Senior Advocate Vs. State of Tamil Nadu Represented by I ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-25-2005
Reported in: AIR2005Mad408; 2005(4)CTC337; (2006)3MLJ684
Similar averments have been made in the other writ petitions questioning lifetime tax.5. Heard Mr. K.M. Vijayan, learned Senior Counsel, appearing in person, Mr. R. Natesan, and M. Krishnappan, learned counsel for petitioners and Mr. N.R. Chandran, learned … life time tax based on the value of vehicles.20. It is the claim of Mr. K.M. Vijayan, learned senior counsel as well as Mr. Natesan, learned counsel for some of the petitioners, that though an argument was advanced
Present: Mr. Kanwaljit Singh Senior Advocate with Vs. Kawal Singh Sehr ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Nov-21-2012
of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 challenging the orders dated 25.9.2012 (Annexure P-2) and 9.10.2012 (Annexure P-4).Learned senior counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner be granted one opportunity to cross examine the complainant. Complainant … to cross examine the complainant on the date fixed before the trial Court i.e.29.11.2012. After hearing the learned senior counsel for the petitioner, I am of the opinion that the instant petition deserves to be allowed. In case
Unknown Vs. Shri S.P. Singh, Learned Senior Counsel with Shri P.S.
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Nov-21-2012
ashok kumar versus state of m.p.W.P.No.4287/2011 21/11/2012 Shri V.K.Shukla, learned counsel for the petitioner. Shri B.P.Pandey, learned Dy. Govt. Adv.for the respondents. Petitioner has filed this writ petition challenging
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »
Hover bars for counts · drag or use +/− to zoom · click a bar to filter by year
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free