Unknown Vs. Shri S.P. Singh, Learned Senior Counsel with Shri P.S.

Unknown vs Shri S.P. Singh, Learned Senior Counsel with Shri P.S.

Type Court Judgment Court Madhya Pradesh Decided Nov 21, 2012

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1032737

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1032737
Court: Madhya Pradesh High Court
Decided On: Nov 21, 2012
Subject: Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue: Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Unknown

Advocate Shri. V.K.Shukla

Respondent

Shri S.P. Singh, Learned Senior Counsel with Shri P.S.

Excerpt

ashok kumar versus state of m.p.w.p.no.4287/2011 21/11/2012 shri v.k.shukla, learned counsel for the petitioner. shri b.p.pandey, learned dy. govt. adv.for the respondents. petitioner has filed this writ petition challenging the action of the respondents in not granting regularization to the petitioner and denying to the petitioner the appropriate pay scale on the post of telephone operator. even though petition is pending since 2011, respondents have not filed any reply. by filing i.a.no.11704/2012 learned counsel for the petitioner points out that petitioner is working since 1998 and even after rejection of his claim for regularization many persons similarly situated have been appointed and they have been granted minimum of the scale of the post in which they are working vide annexures pi-1, pi-2, pi-3, pi-4 and pi-5. as similar benefit is denied to the petitioner, the petitioner seeks for the same benefit which has been granted to various similarly situated employees by virtue of the order passed by the high court. taking note of the grievance of the petitioner as is not put forth in i.a.no.11704/2012, respondents are directed to re- examine the case of the petitioner for grant of benefit at par with the employees who have been granted the benefit vide annexures pi-1 to pi-5 and decide the claim of the petitioner in accordance to law within a period of two months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. with the aforesaid, this petition stands allowed and disposed of. c.c.as per rules. (rajendra menon) judge mrs.mishra

Full Judgment

ashok kumar versus state of m.p.W.P.No.4287/2011 21/11/2012 Shri V.K.Shukla, learned counsel for the petitioner.

Shri B.P.Pandey, learned Dy.

Govt.

Adv.for the respondents.

Petitioner has filed this writ petition challenging the action of the respondents in not granting regularization to the petitioner and denying to the petitioner the appropriate pay scale on the post of Telephone Operator.

Even though petition is pending since 2011, respondents have not filed any reply.

By filing I.A.No.11704/2012 learned counsel for the petitioner points out that petitioner is working since 1998 and even after rejection of his claim for regularization many persons similarly situated have been appointed and they have been granted minimum of the scale of the post in which they are working vide Annexures PI-1, PI-2, PI-3, PI-4 and PI-5.

As similar benefit is denied to the petitioner, the petitioner seeks for the same benefit which has been granted to various similarly situated employees by virtue of the order passed by the High Court.

Taking note of the grievance of the petitioner as is not put forth in I.A.No.11704/2012, respondents are directed to re- examine the case of the petitioner for grant of benefit at par with the employees who have been granted the benefit vide Annexures PI-1 to PI-5 and decide the claim of the petitioner in accordance to law within a period of two months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order.

With the aforesaid, this petition stands allowed and disposed of.

c.c.as per rules.

(Rajendra Menon) Judge mrs.mishra

Same Court & Year Madhya Pradesh · 2012 Same Parties Unknown vs Shri S.P. Singh, Learned Senior Counsel with Shri ... Same Subject Education

Education Certified copy high court Any person Has been R and D