Self Accused - Judgment Search Results

…appellant/Defendant Vs. Duncan International (i) Limited

Court: Kolkata

for AIJML and respondents and our conclusions are :a) AIJMLs self-seeking claims against old promoters and associates cannot be treated as is not entitled to leave to sign judgment and the defendant is entitled to unconditional leave to defend. (b) If the

O.Nagendran Defendant Vs. Arulmigu Meenakshi

Court: Chennai

that the plaintiff is the owner of the property. The defendant has executed Ex.A.5, lease deed, dated 25.7.1989. It is also

Bhumidhar Nath (Accused 1), (Assam) and Another Vs. State of Assam

Court: Guwahati

Nath alias Tulukan is deceased. He is mater-uncle of the accused-persons. There was a property dispute between them. Earlier to the

Bhumidhar Nath (Accused 1), Darrang (Assam) and Others Vs. State of As ...

Court: Guwahati

is brother of PW-4 has corroborated the version of the accused 6 that all the accused-persons entered the room and drag

Bhumidhar Nath (Accused 1), Darrang (Assam) and Others Vs. State of As ...

Court: Guwahati

deposed that he was present in the house when the accused-persons chasing the deceased trespassed into their house while the accused

Majee Taha (Accused) Vs. the State

Court: Guwahati

firing. As a result of these provocations the appellant lost self-control and fired at Apiop Peyang who was an Adi. We died as a result of these injuries.The links connecting the accused with person who fired at Apiop Peyang namely the red

NuruddIn (Accused) Vs. State of Assam

Court: Guwahati

is another reason why we say that misfortune struck the accused the moment he struck the deceased Jabur, as alleged by

Dholia Ravji (Accused No. 1) Vs. State

Court: Gujarat

Reported in: 1961CriLJ813; (1960)GLR151

in the ordinary course of nature to cause death. The accused had not in his examination at the Sessions trial stated

Rajeswar, (Accused) Vs. State

Court: Chennai

Reported in: 1992CriLJ661

station and registered a case in Crime No. 9/86 against accused for alleged offences under Section 7(1)(a)(ii) of the Act for

Defendant No.2 Is in Revision Under Article 227 of the Vs. Kewal Singh ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

relevant and material. It is not in dispute that the defendant/petitioner is the propounder of the Will Ex.D-2 and, therefore, he