Self Accused - Judgment Search Results
Thankachan Mathew (Accused No.1) vs State of Kerala
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Dec-06-2023
482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (“the Code” for the sake of brevity).2. Petitioners are the accused in C.C No. 325/2022on the file of Judicial First Class Magistrate Court-II, Hosdrug, arising from Crime No. 0727/2021
O.Nagendran Defendant Vs. Arulmigu Meenakshi
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Oct-29-2011
1. The Appellant/Second Defendant has focused the present Second Appeal before this Court as against the Judgment and Decree dated 14.12.2005 in
Accused Naval Kumar Has Filed This Petition Under Section 482 Vs. Stat ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Feb-21-2013
the petitioner Mr.Sandeep Chhabra, DAG Punjab for respondent No.1 Mr.Anshuman Chopra, Advocate, for respondent No.2 L.N.Mittal, J. (Oral) Accused Naval Kumar has filed this petition under section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure (for short, Cr.P.C.) for
18-section briefs on any result in this list
…appellant/Defendant Vs. Duncan International (i) Limited
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Feb-16-2012
have examined the contentions of the senior advocates for AIJML and respondents and our conclusions are :a) AIJML’s self-seeking claims against old promoters and associates cannot be treated as ‘dues’ payable by the old promoters and associates. … 2008. As facts and issues arising in all these suits are common, the appeals preferred by the appellant/original defendant and the cross objection filed by the respondent/original plaintiff are being disposed of by this common judgment and
Defendant No.2 Is in Revision Under Article 227 of the Vs. Kewal Singh ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Sep-13-2013
JASWANT SINGH Present:- Mr.J.S.Brar, Advocate for the Petitioner/defendant no.2. Mr.Surinder Garg, Advocate for respondents/plaintiff. *** JASWANT SINGH, J.(ORAL) Defendant no.2 is in revision under Article 227 of the Constitution assailing the order dated 12.10.2012 passed by the
“ That the Defendant Alleged Sale Deed Dated Vs. Gurtej Singh
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Jul-10-2013
fabricated document and is liable to be set aside.” Para no.4 (a) be also added: “ That the defendant alleged sale deed dated 20.04.1998 in his favour. The alleged sale deed dated 20.04.1998 is a forged and
The Defendant with Intent to Obstruct or Delay the Vs. Smt. Sabra and ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Jan-09-2014
money paid by the petitioner stood be forfeited. Order 38 Rule 5 CPC reads ad under: “ Where defendant may be called upon to furnish security for production of property.-(1) Where, at any stage of a Rani
Petitioner/Defendant No.2 Is in Revision Under Article 227 of the Vs. ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: May-20-2014
been closed by order. From the paper book it is apparent that the respondent no.1/plaintiff stood guarantor for defendant no.1 and defendant no.2- petitioner towards liability of a loan raised from a Finance company for purchase of
“defendant No.1 Exparte Vide Order Dated Vs. Chamel Singh and Others ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Jul-04-2014
opportunity for this purpose”.15.3.2014. “PW namely Kiran Kaur is present. Her cross examination could not be recorded as defendant requested adjournment. Today was the last opportunity to conclude its entire evidence by the plaintiffs. Since the defendant
Bhumidhar Nath (Accused 1), (Assam) and Another Vs. State of Assam
Court: Guwahati
Decided on: Feb-21-2014
of the prosecution case disclose that one Troilokya Nath alias Tulukan is deceased. He is mater-uncle of the accused-persons. There was a property dispute between them. Earlier to the incident in question, the deceased had assaulted Indra,
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- Next ›
- Last »
Hover bars for counts · drag or use +/− to zoom · click a bar to filter by year
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free