XXXX(Accused) vs State of Kerala Represented by Public Prosecutor

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Jun 28, 2022

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1489501

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1489501
Court: Kerala High Court
Judge: Honourable Mr. Justice Gopinath P.
Decided On: Jun 28, 2022
Case Number: Bail Appl./4570/2022

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

XXXX(Accused)

Respondent

State of Kerala Represented by Public Prosecutor

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr. justice gopinath p. tuesday, the 28th day of june 2022 / 7th ashadha, 1944 bail appl. no. 4570 of 2022 against the order in bail appl. 3423/2022 of high court of kerala petitioner/accused: xxxx(accused) aged 66 years name and address not shown, pin - 691000 by advs. b.n.haskar b.k.gopalakrishnan respondent/complainant state of kerala represented by public prosecutor high court of kerala ernakulam, pin - 692031 adv. k.b. sony (pp) this bail application having come up for admission on 28.06.2022, the court on the same day delivered the following: bail appl. no. 4570 of 2022 2orderthis court had rejected the bail application of the petitioner by order dated 23.05.2022 in b.a. no.3423/2022, i see no change of circumstances warranting the release of the petitioner on bail at this point of time. it is settled by the judgment of the supreme court in kalyan chandra sarkar v. pappu yadav; (2005) khc 604 = (2005) 2 scc 42, that unless there is a substantial change of circumstances warranting a different view being taken, successive bail application cannot be entertained. bail application will stand dismissed. sd/- gopinath p. judge ajt

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE GOPINATH P. TUESDAY, THE 28TH DAY OF JUNE 2022 / 7TH ASHADHA, 1944 BAIL APPL. NO. 4570 OF 2022 AGAINST THE ORDER IN Bail Appl. 3423/2022 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA PETITIONER/ACCUSED: XXXX(ACCUSED) AGED 66 YEARS NAME AND ADDRESS NOT SHOWN, PIN - 691000 BY ADVS. B.N.HASKAR B.K.GOPALAKRISHNAN RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT OF KERALA ERNAKULAM, PIN - 692031 ADV. K.B. SONY (PP) THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 28.06.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: BAIL APPL. NO. 4570 OF 2022 2

ORDER

This Court had rejected the bail application of the petitioner by order dated 23.05.2022 in B.A. No.3423/2022, I see no change of circumstances warranting the release of the petitioner on bail at this point of time. It is settled by the judgment of the Supreme Court in Kalyan Chandra Sarkar v. Pappu Yadav; (2005) KHC 604 = (2005) 2 SCC 42, that unless there is a substantial change of circumstances warranting a different view being taken, successive bail application cannot be entertained. Bail application will stand dismissed. sd/- GOPINATH P. JUDGE ajt

Same Court & Year Kerala · 2022 Same Parties XXXX(Accused) vs State of Kerala Represented by Public Prosec... Same Judge Honourable Mr. Justice Gopinath P.