Selection - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: selection Page 1 of about 325 results (0.024 seconds)FeIn Vs. Selective Service System
Court: US Supreme Court
reaction provoked by the Second Circuit's decision in Wolf v. Selective Service Local Bd., 372 F.2d 817 (1967). See H.R.Rep. No.
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSelective Service Sys. Vs. Mpirg
Court: US Supreme Court
should be shared generally, in accordance with a system of selection which is fair and just. . . ." 451(c).
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSelection Committee for Admission to Govt. Medical Colleges and Govt. ...
Court: Karnataka
Reported in: AIR1982Kant193; ILR1982KAR215; 1982(1)KarLJ1
real question that arises in this appeal is whether the Selection Committee afforded a reasonable opportunity to the petitioner to establish
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTOestereich Vs. Selective Svc. Bd.
Court: US Supreme Court
Board administers are facially invalid. "Classification is the key to selection," 32 CFR 1622.1(b), and among a local Board's most
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTHaryana Staff Selection Commission Vs. Priyanka
Court: Supreme Court of India
M.A. NOS. 539-569 OF2022IN CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 5065-5095 OF2021HARYANA STAFF SELECTION COMMISSION ..APPELLANT(S) VERSUS PRIYANKA AND OTHERS ETC. RESPONDENT(S) WITH CONTEMPT
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTThe Selection Authority And Secretary Vs. Smt Geeta Dattatreya Gokarn
Court: Karnataka Dharwad
not selected in the main list and when the respondent- selection authority prepared additional list, the petitioner was selected in the
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTStaff Selection Commission Through Its Chairman Vs. Mahesh Kumar
Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Principal Bench New Delhi
High Court in LPA No. 562/2011 - Delhi Subordinate Services Selection Board and Another Vs. Ram Kumar Gijroya and Others decided
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTLalithamma Vs. Selection Committee for Admission to Medical Colleges, ...
Court: Karnataka
Reported in: AIR1972Kant37; AIR1972Mys37; (1971)2MysLJ361
persons equally situated. That the petitioner and those whom the Selection Committee selected were equally situated cannot, from the facts above
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBreen Vs. Selective Service Local Bd. No. 16
Court: US Supreme Court
such training and service and who, at the time of selection, are registered and classified, but not deferred or exempted. "
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCentral Airmen Selection Board and anr. Vs. Surender Kumar Das
Court: Supreme Court of India
Reported in: AIR2003SC240; 2003(1)ALLMR(SC)763; 2003(51)BLJR354; [2003(1)JCR162(SC)]; JT2002(9)SC401; (2003)1MLJ76(SC); (2003)1UPLBEC253
reported at the aforesaid center, he was informed that his selection had been cancelled. The respondent thereafter represented to the authorities
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>