Section 617 Of The Companies Act - Judgment Search Results

Director-general of Vs. Cement Corporation of Gujarat

Court : Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission MRTPC

Reported in : (1994)80CompCas15NULL

..... gujarat and the respondent being a subsidiary would be a government company under section 617 of the companies act 1956 some shares of the respondent company were issued to the public in the year 1987 88 ..... no doubt the respondent could be said to have been a government company within the meaning of section 617 of the companies act 1956 but from 1987 onwards the respondent admittedly ceased to be a .....

In Re: Travancore-cochin

Court : Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission MRTPC

Reported in : (1978)48CompCas765NULL

..... and chemicals travancore ltd a central government managed company and the kerala state industrial development corporation under section 617 of the companies act the company is therefore a government company 2 in our opinion the monopolies and .....

In Re: Bharat Overseas Finances

Court : Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission MRTPC

Reported in : (1990)68CompCas494NULL

been stated by the director general in his application under section 12a it is obvious that the unfair trade practices indulged to take against the mushroom growth of finance and investment companies offering staggeringly high rates of interest to depositors leading us squarely within the ambit of section 12a of the mrtp act 12 we are also of the opinion that besides there

Director-general of Vs. Iofic Leasing Ltd.

Court : Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission MRTPC

Reported in : (1991)70CompCas62NULL

1 this order shall dispose of an enquiry instituted under sections 36a 36b c and 36d of the monopolies and restrictive gold jewellery simply to circumvent the aforesaid provisions of the companies act 1956 v the respondent has indicated the denominations of section 36d 2 of the monopolies and restrictive trade practices act the director general contended that this application is in no

Vinod Chopra Vs. Film Makers Combine

Court : Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission MRTPC

chopra proprietor of m s vinod chopra productions bombay under section 10 a i of the monopolies and restrictive trade practices fmc is a company incorporated under section 25 of the companies act 1956 in pursuance of the objectives laid down in a to 1 of section 33 1 of the mrtp act are deemed restrictive trade practices and they do not have

Director-general of Vs. Ub-mec Batteries Ltd.

Court : Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission MRTPC

is the charge relating to the discount system falling under section 33 1 e of the act before we take up reconstruction of a company or the amalgamation of the two companies the court under section 391 of the companies act has of section 2 o and section 33 1 of the act 3 the respondent on receipt of the notice of enquiry

Maharashtra General Kamgar Union Vs. Hindustan Lever Ltd. and anr.

Court : Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission MRTPC

Reported in : (1994)81CompCas784NULL

null and void 14 the interim injunction prayed for under section 12a of the monopolies and restrictive trade practices act is with petitions for amalgamation submitted by two companies under the companies act and that if the commission restrained the parties from amalgamation under section 391 and allied provisions of the companies act in accordance with the scheme of the companies act and

Panjon Ltd. Vs. Swad Industries and Leasing Ltd.

Court : Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission MRTPC

Reported in : (1994)81CompCas437NULL

the commission may hear arguments in the pending application under section 12a the arguments were heard quite at length and the applicant that was a case under section 20 of the companies act and it was held therein that a person has and 36a 1 of the monopolies and restrictive trade practices act on the lines of the order issued by the district

M.S. Shoes East Limited Vs. Indian Bank and ors.

Court : Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission MRTPC

Reported in : I(2003)CPJ131MRTP

its grievance the relevant portion of sub section 1 of section 12b of the act reads as under 1 to institute sections 62 and 68 read with section 621 of the companies act for inducing subscribers to subscribe for the fdc s of section 12b of the act clearly shows that the act provides for institution of parallel proceedings for the same cause

Director-general (i and R) Vs. Trustwel Inc.

Court : Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission MRTPC

Reported in : (1998)1CompLJ555MRTPC

association of individuals occurring in the definition of owner in section 2 ja of the act cannot be the same as deposits rules 1975 the provisions of section 58a of the companies act 1956 apply to unsecured loans and deposits only the to the date of dissolution of the firm inasmuch as action has been initiated before the dissolution of the firm he