Section 617 Of The Companies Act - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: section 617 of the companies act Court: mumbai aurangabad Page 1 of about 22 results (0.272 seconds)* FakhruddIn S/O. Hyderali Vs. Abbas S/O Abdul HusaIn and ors.
Court : Mumbai Aurangabad
..... already having 50 equity participation thus all the three companies became government companies within the meaning of section 617 of the companies act 1956 the deponent further contends that thereafter the central ..... of america the government company means a company as defined in section 617 of the companies act under the act of 1974 right title and interest of esso company were acquired in order .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTJagannath S/O Anna Khakare and Others Vs. the State of Maharashtra, Th ...
Court : Mumbai Aurangabad
..... 15 4 article 226 companies act 1956 section 617 electricity act 2003 section 133 r w section 131 section 134 writ petitions petitioners seeking direction to respondent company to provide maximum ..... are controverted by respondents contending that respondent company is registered under section 617 of the companies act and the company can frame classification and recruitment regulations 2005 .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTDadaji Vs. The State of Maharashtra. Copy to be served through Public ...
Court : Mumbai Aurangabad
..... a body owned or controlled or aided by the government or a government company as defined in section 617 of the companies act 1956 1 of 1956 viii any person who holds an office by ..... shall surrender to bail bonds to serve out the remaining sentence prevention of corruption act 1988 section 7 section 13 2 conviction justifiability appellant was convicted and sentenced for offences punishable under .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTDr. Madhavrao S/O Bhujangrao Kinhalkar Vs. Ashok S/O Shankarrao Chavan ...
Court : Mumbai Aurangabad
..... section 81 or section 82 or section 117 of the act it was emphasized that section 83 did not find place in section 86 under section 87 of the act ..... every possibility that the personnel of the machine manufacturing company may have acted under the influence of respondent no 1 and at ..... satpal singh and others reported in 2007 3 scc 617 and it is contended that consideration of correctness of allegations and .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTishwar S/O Vithalrao Mohite Vs. the State of Maharashtra Through the S ...
Court : Mumbai Aurangabad
other company which is required to be registered under the companies act 1956 1 of 1956 or any other law for the petitioner as a police patil is governed by the act of 1967 and the rules of 1968 13 the govt
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTNanasaheb Vs. Oriental Insurance Company Ltd. and Others
Court : Mumbai Aurangabad
panchnama the crime was registered for the offences punishable under sections 304 a 279 337 338 of i p c and maintained the award is to be prepared accordingly motor vehicles act 1988 section 166 cases referred 1 sanjeev kumar samrat
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTNew India Assurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Budha Shrawan Zodge and Others
Court : Mumbai Aurangabad
d no order as to cost motor vehicles act 1988 section 166 cases referred 1 oriental insurance company ltd v learned counsel for appellant submits that the policy was an act policy and the liability to cover the risk was only
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBalasaheb Ambadas Dhockchawale Vs. Indian Seamless Metal Tubes Ltd.
Court : Mumbai Aurangabad
of trade unions and prevention of unfair labor practices act section 44 dismissal from service appeal against the order of labour parties 2 the respondent is a company registered under the companies act 1956 and is a factory under the factories act 888 the apex court had an occasion to deal with acts of abusive nature it was concluded that the said acts
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTKalawatibai Vs. Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. and Others
Court : Mumbai Aurangabad
breach of condition of policy in view of provisions of section 149 of motor vehicles act and it was proved 8 claim was made under section 163 a of motor vehicles act 1988 4 the insurance company took the defence that there
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTShivaji Vs. Jagdish
Court : Mumbai Aurangabad
judge was dealing with a civil suit the presumptions under section 118a 138 and 139 of the negotiable instruments act are the appeals are accordingly allowed and disposed of negotiable instruments act 1881 section 138 118 139 cases referred 1 k n
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT