Section 617 Of The Companies Act - Judgment Search Results

In Re: Bharat Overseas Finances

Court : Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission MRTPC

Reported in : (1990)68CompCas494NULL

practices in the form of misleading and spurious claims within section 36a of the mrtp act 9 the director general has reserve bank of india directions and non banking non financial companies under section 58a of the companies act 1956 are statutorily balance of convenience is against the respondent in implementing an act which has the interest of consumers at heart it is

Consumer Education and Research Vs. T.T.K. Pharma Ltd. and ors.

Court : Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission MRTPC

Reported in : (1990)68CompCas89NULL

requirement of furnishing a return is not applicable under sub section 5 to the issue and allotment of shares which are those shares only thus the trade practice pursued by these companies in the matter of inviting subscriptions for equity shares is the present case firstly it was held that for an activity to amount to industry it must be systematic here it

Director-general of Vs. Hindustan Lever Limited

Court : Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission MRTPC

Reported in : (1989)66CompCas51NULL

may decide are restrictive trade practices within the meaning of section 2 o of the act 53 the second alleged restrictive came to know through conversant and substantial sources that big companies of the country particularly hindustan lever are making unfair trade clause of sub section 1 of section 38 of the act we decide the fourth issue against the respondent and hold

In Re: Mangalore Bankers and

Court : Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission MRTPC

2 the director general has also filed an application under section 36b and 36c of the monopolies and restrictive trade practices to take against the mushroom growth of finance and investment companies offering staggeringly high rates of interest to depositors leading us 36b and 36c of the monopolies and restrictive trade practices act 1969 against the same respondent seeking initiation of proceedings under

Director-general of Vs. Travancore Finance and Exchange

Court : Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission MRTPC

Reported in : (1989)65CompCas518NULL

promises which constitute unfair trade practices within the meaning of section 36a 4 we have gone through the director general s reserve bank of india act 1934 14 that such finance companies as the respondent are doing a positive disservice to the seeking initiation of proceedings under section 36d of the aforesaid act and we have directed issuance of notice of enquiry against

In Re: Polar Industries Ltd. and

Court : Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission MRTPC

Reported in : (1987)61CompCas805NULL

and registration hereinafter referred as to the director general under section 36b c of the monopolies and restrictive trade practices act come up with applications under section 36d 2 of the act giving the following undertaking a the respondent will not engage

In Re: Godrej and Boyce Mfg. Co. P.

Court : Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission MRTPC

during a period of time when the relevant provisions of section 36a are in operation i think that that duty or plea that in issuing the notice of enquiry the commission acted in excess of its jurisdiction and applied section 36a retrospectively

Director-general of Vs. Universal-luggage

Court : Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission MRTPC

Reported in : (1987)62CompCas184NULL

restrictive trade practices act i e sub section 2 of section 12a it is a fundamental principle of law that when respondent 2 the respondent is a company registered under the companies act 1956 as a private limited company but later converted paragraphs 9 section 12a of the monopolies and restrictive practices act prescribes as to under what circumstances an injunction can be

Director-general of Vs. Inter-shoppe

Court : Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission MRTPC

1 this is an enquiry under section 36d read with section 36a 36b d of the monopolies and restrictive trade practices was violative of the provisions of section 36a of the act thus notice of enquiry dated august 26 1985 was issued

In Re: Aidan Agarwala and Company

Court : Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission MRTPC

to impose unjustified cost on consumers within the meaning of section 2 o ii of the act this restrictive trade practice within the meaning of section 2 o ii of the act this restrictive trade practice has been brought to the notice