Skip to content


Section 617 Of The Companies Act - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: section 617 of the companies act Court: jammu and kashmir Page 1 of about 303 results (0.208 seconds)
Dec 19 1984 (HC)

Jagdish Chander Gupta Vs. the Jammu and Kashmir Bank Ltd. and ors.

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Reported in : AIR1986J& K1

..... that the respondent bank is a government company within the meaning of section 617 of the companies act government company for the purpose of the companies act means any company in which not less than 51 of ..... articles of association of the respondent bank it is a government company within the meaning of section 617 of the companies act and therefore is to be treated as an instrumentality or agency .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 03 2006 (HC)

Firdous Ahmad Tanki and ors. Vs. J and K Bank Ltd. and State of J and ...

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Reported in : 2006(2)JKJ146

..... a government company registered under the companies act 1956 section 617 of the companies act defines govt company as follows 617 definition of government company for the purposes of this act government company means any company in ..... to influence and control every decision of the board of directors section 300 of the companies act 1956 provides 300 interested director not to participate or vote .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 10 1981 (HC)

O.P. Dogra and ors. Vs. State

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Reported in : 1982CriLJ1548

..... the result that the oriental fire and general insurance company became a government company as defined by section 617 of the companies act central act no 1 of 1956 applicable to the state of jammu and kashmir .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 08 1988 (HC)

J.K. Cigarettes Co. Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Reported in : 1988(18)ECC34,1989(39)ELT355(J& K)

1 petitioner no 1 is a company incorporated under the companies act 1956 the company has set up a factory at constitution act 1939 taxation laws extension to jammu and kashmir act 41 of 1954

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 21 2011 (HC)

National Insurance Co. and ors. Vs. Smt. Gita Nagpal and ors.

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

an expert businessman and used to look after the export section of the firm kewal nagpal was another partner of the just compensation in terms of section168 of the motor vehicles act 1988 or the amount which he would on average withdraw

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 27 1988 (HC)

J.K. Cigarettes Ltd. Vs. Superintendent of Central Excise

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Reported in : 1988(17)ECC390,1989(39)ELT373(J& K)

a manufactured product and sub clauses i and ia of section 2 f of the 1944 act deal specifically with the the first petitioner is a limited company registered under the companies act 1956 it had set up a factory for manufacture manufacture as contained in section 2 f of the 1944 act puts the controversy beyond any pale of doubt the definition

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 23 2010 (HC)

M/S Reckitt Benckiser. Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

and ors respondents have resisted the petitions by stating that section 5 a of the act of 1944 confers the power specified areas within the state to carry on the manufacturing activities d that if it was an exemption by way of

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 28 2015 (HC)

Sanjeev Khajuria Vs. Ravinder Singh Pathania

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

trial court issued process against the petitioner for offence under section 138 of negotiable instruments act invoking jurisdiction of this court which deal with the import of section 141 of ni act since in the instant case the issue does not relate

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 01 2016 (HC)

Suman Lata Bhagat Vs. State and Others

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

basis of a complaint made to it in terms of section 11 of the act of 2002 a citizen of high be followed when the commission intends to take suo moto action mr kohli vehemently argued that the view taken by the

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 24 2015 (HC)

Nazir Ahma Gojar and Another Vs. Nizam-ud/din Gojar and Others

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

of copy of this order benami transactions prohibition act 2010 section 5 1 cases a where it does not disclose a cause of action b where the relief claimed in undervalued and the plaintiff

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //