Skip to content


Section 617 Of The Companies Act - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: section 617 of the companies act Court: jammu and kashmir Year: 1967 Page 1 of about 5 results (0.499 seconds)
Mar 06 1967 (HC)

Jammu Municipality Vs. Faquir Hussain

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Decided on : Mar-06-1967

Reported in : 1968CriLJ162

passed by the sessions judge and convict the respondent under section 16 of the prevention of food adulteration act but reduce proved it was therefore held that these acts were official acts and were performed properly under section 114 illus e of

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Oct 13 1967 (HC)

Dr. Ghulam Mahi-ud-dIn Vs. Anti-corruption Commission and ors.

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Decided on : Oct-13-1967

Reported in : 1968CriLJ1074

of saurashtra 1952crilj805 which is more pertinent would show that section 11 of the saurashtra public safety measures third amendment ordinance impugned act with those contained in the public servants inquiries act civil services classification control and appeal rules or the civil

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 14 1967 (HC)

Kotwal (T.C.) Vs. State of Jammu and Kashmir and anr.

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Decided on : Jan-14-1967

Reported in : (1968)IILLJ780J& K

the district courts and the courts subordinate thereto the relevant sections of jammu and kashmir constitution on the point are sub 126 unless such opportunity it dispensed with by the governor acting under the provisos b and c to that clause in

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Oct 26 1967 (HC)

State Vs. Abdullah Thakur and ors.

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Decided on : Oct-26-1967

Reported in : 1968CriLJ1082

district magistrate anantnag to stand their trial for offences under sections 148 395 and 397 read with section 34 r p it has been held before the code was amended by act 26 of 1955 it was necessary for the magistrate holding

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 19 1967 (HC)

Ammar Nath and ors. Vs. District Magistrate

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Decided on : Dec-19-1967

Reported in : 1968CriLJ1000

must be strictly followed as the safeguards provided by sub section 3 of section 3 of the preventive detention act 1964 the aforesaid sub section 3 of section 8 of the act that the fact of the order of detention and the

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //