Section 511 - Judgment Search Results

Sulekhan Singh and ors. Vs. State

Court: Rajasthan

Reported in: 1999CriLJ3798; 1999(3)WLC415; 1999(1)WLN449

..... of outraging the modesty of a woman punishable under section 354 i p c9 section 511 i p c prescribes punishment for an attempt not ..... both 10 the expression whoever attempts to commit an offence in section 511 can only mean whoever intents to do a certain act with ..... otherwise expressly provided for section 511 reads as follows punishment for attempting to commit offence .....

Madan Lal Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: (2002)10SCC185

..... the learned counsel since under the criminal procedure code the offence under section 511 of the indian penal code could be tried by which ..... the impugned judgment did consider the aforesaid question and interpreting section 70 of the army act has come to the conclusion ..... the impugned judgment did consider the aforesaid question and interpreting section 70 of the army act has come to the conclusion .....

Smt. Champabai Vs. M. Girijapathy and Others

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: 1999(1)ALD(Cri)860; 1999CriLJ3101; ILR1999KAR3839; 2000(1)KarLJ530

..... 465 506 342 344 302 201 107 119 202 read with section 511 and section 217 of the ipc these respondents are accused nos 16 17 ..... to enjoy usufructs was clearly in violation of the provisions of section 4 of the ptcl act the burden is heavy on the plaintiff to prove ..... was not obtained by him in contravention of the provisions of section 4 of the ptcl act on facts held the transaction is in total violation .....

Thomas Cook India Limited Vs. Hindustan theremo Prints Limited (In Liq ...

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 1999IIAD(Delhi)705; [2001]103CompCas138(Delhi); 79(1999)DLT404; 1999(49)DRJ709; (1999)122PLR26

..... means of the other application being c a no 831 88 under sections 511 and 518 the first respondent claimed the following reliefs a restore ..... of the company filed a company petition no 62 83 under section 434 1 of the companies act 1956 seeking winding up of ..... and subject to the orders of the company judge companies act 1956 section 446 leave to sue revocation of non disclosure of material facts .....

R.K. Bhatia Vs. Delhi Vidyut Board and ors.

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 1999IIAD(Delhi)413

..... to costs the case dealt with the dismissal of the petitioner from the rvice under section 511 b of the delhi municipal corporation act 1957 on the ground of negligence in meter ..... to impose the punishment the learned counsel for the respondents mr jayant nath referred to section 511b of the delhi municipal corporation act 1957 6 i am of the view that .....

South Central Bell Telephone Co. Vs. Alabama

Court: US Supreme Court

as mutually exclusive proxies for one another oregon waste systems 511 u s at 103 accord fulton supra at 332 333

United States Vs. Martinez-salazar

Court: US Supreme Court

g j e b v alabama ex rel t b 511 u s 127 1994 gender hernandez v new york 500

MartIn Vs. Hadix

Court: US Supreme Court

..... 802addressing appropriate remedies in prison litigationexplicitly provides that it applies to pending cases this section shall apply with respect to all prospective relief whether such relief was originally granted ..... prescribed the proper reach of 803 d 3 landgraf 511 u s at 280 we must determine whether application of this section in this case would have retroactive effects inconsistent with .....

Nand Lal Vs. State of H.P.

Court: Himachal Pradesh

Reported in: 2000CriLJ3106

..... has been urged that even the commission of offence punishable under sections 376 511 i p c was not proved against the accused and ..... the accused was guilty of commission of an offence punishable under sections 376 511 i p c and has contended that the conviction of the ..... he has been rightly held guilty of the offence punishable under sections 376 511 of the indian penal code 22 it was lastly contended by .....

Cunningham Vs. Hamilton County

Court: US Supreme Court

..... to this question 525 u s 1098 1999 and now affirm 3 ii section 1291 of the judicial code generally vests courts of appeals with jurisdiction ..... 506 u s 139 142 147 1993 mitchell v forsyth 472 u s 511 524 530 1985 cohen supra at 545 547 that small category includes ..... deciding whether an order is sufficiently collateral see e g digital equipment corp 511 u s at 868 richardson merrell 472 u s at 439 even .....