Section 511 - Judgment Search Results

Smt. Sewaki Vs. the State of Himachal Pradesh

Court: Himachal Pradesh

Reported in: 1981CriLJ919

..... convicted and sentenced as aforesaid thakur singh who was charged under section 201 of the indian penal code read with section 511 of the indian penal code was acquitted 8 the prosecution case ..... indian penal code for the murder of kalawati and thakur singh was charge sheeted under section 201 511 of the indian penal code 6 the defence of the appellant as disclosed in .....

Jug Raj Verma Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court: Rajasthan

Reported in: 1982CriLJ526

..... alleged in the report itself he made references to section 218 353 and 420 read with section 511 i p c at the time of arguments ..... that effect but submitted some cases dealing with the requirements of sections 217 218 and 464 ipc as regards the question of interference ..... enquiry himself this order was challenged before the high court under section 561a cr p c old this application was allowed and the .....

The Municipal Corporation of Delhi Vs. Mukhtiar Singh

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 22(1982)DLT367; ILR1982Delhi246

..... an employee of the corporation by virtue of the provisions containedin section 511 of the act he was promoted as upper divisionclerk under ..... 1957 he became an employee of the corporation by virtue of section 511 of the delhi municipal corporation act he was promoted as ..... that the commissioner in exercise of powers conferredon him under section 491 of the act had delegated all his powersto the .....

Hindustan Aeronautics Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: (1981)22CTR(Kar)91; [1981]6TAXMAN264(Kar)

orderchandrakantaraj urs j 1 petitioner hindustan aeronautics limited is an assessee under the it act 1961 hereinafter referred to as...

Upjohn Co. Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

1979 in re grand jury subpoena 599 f 2d 504 511 ca2 1979 footnote 5 see magistrate s opinion 71 ustc

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Prabhabati Bansali

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: (1982)29CTR(Cal)15,[1983]141ITR419(Cal)

..... in a year exceeds the municipal valuation of the property sub section 1 of section 23 has been amended to provide that where any property is ..... 48 544 09 as against the actual receipts of rs 1 58 511 20 realised from those licensees for that portion the assessee thus claimed ..... on behalf of the revenue that the sum of rs 1 98 511 20 actually received by the assessee as licence fee or compensation from .....

Metromedia, Inc. Vs. City of San Diego

Court: US Supreme Court

..... the ban is limited to residential areas to the entire city except its most unsightly sections or is city wide it unquestionably will limit the quantity of communication moreover the ..... of billboards within that history see f presbrey the history and development of advertising 497 511 1929 tocker standardized outdoor advertising history economics and self regulation in outdoor advertising history .....

Haig Vs. Agee

Court: US Supreme Court

..... employees on a country by country basis and who s who sections containing detailed biographical information on all such persons footnote 4 see ..... our foreign intelligence service see also id at 444 u s 511 513 the court in united states v curtiss wright export corp ..... may expressly recognizes substantial discretion see 23 op atty gen 509 511 1901 footnote 27 the main impetus for the 1856 statute was .....

Tara Chand Vs. Ishwar Dass and anr.

Court: Himachal Pradesh

Reported in: AIR1982HP29

..... of denying the title of the plaintiffs for applying the provisions of section 111 g t p act the plaintiffs should first have accepted the ..... 14 the facts in 1970 72 pun lr 223 air 1970 punj 511 supra relied upon by the learned district judge are quite distinguishable and ..... facts of the authority 1970 72 pun lr 223 air 1979 punj 511 supra are altogether inapplicable to the facts of the present case 16 .....

City of Milwaukee Vs. Illinois

Court: US Supreme Court

..... this case congressman aspin of wisconsin proposed an amendment to 402 sec a section 402 of the federal water pollution control act is amended by ..... 1980 united states v gilman 347 u s 507 347 u s 511 513 1954 we have always recognized that federal common law is ..... enforcing stricter pollution controls and standards than those required by the act 511 a 33 u s c 1371 a thus under the statutory scheme .....