Section 511 - Judgment Search Results

Sittu Vs. State

Court: Rajasthan

Reported in: AIR1967Raj149; 1967CriLJ920

..... an application in revision by sittu against his conviction under section 376 read with section 511 of the indian penal code he has been sentenced to ..... amounts to an offence under section 354 of the indian penal code and not under section 376 read with section 511 of the indian penal code ..... an attempt to commit rape and not merely an offence under section 354 8 i therefore do not find any force in the .....

K.C. Aggarwal Vs. State

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Reported in: AIR1967P& H234; 1967CriLJ807

..... kapur j 1 k c aggarwal applicant was convicted under section 420 read with section 511 of the indian penal code and sentenced to six months ..... the respondent it is said the phraseology used therein sub section 1 of section 11 is wide enough to enable the appellate court or ..... order apart from that there is yet another difficulty sub section 1 of section 11 entitles a court to make an order under this .....

Sebastian Vs. Rubber Board and anr.

Court: Kerala

Reported in: [1967]37CompCas117(Ker)

..... a stay would be to make the pan passu distribution enjoined by section 511 difficult and i am prepared to regard it as a case ..... on behalf of the respondent considers only the applicability of sub section 2 of section 518 to proceedings taken by a collector under the revenue ..... of hyderabadj that the object of the amendment effected to sub section 2 of section 537 of the companies act by act 65 of 1960 .....

Manilal Harchand Mehta Vs. State of Gujarat

Court: Gujarat

Reported in: (1967)GLR413; (1967)IILLJ497Guj

..... under the indian penal code as the offence under s 161 read with s 511 indian penal code section 511 indian penal code does not apply at all and so far as the ..... but also attempt to obtain trial judge erred in specifying offence as offence under section 161 read with section 511 when attempt itself is offence no scope for saying that such attempt is .....

American Trucking Associations, Inc. Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

in no 510 carl helmetag jr for appellant in no 511 solicitor general marshall assistant attorney general turner lionel kestenbaum and

Davis Vs. North Carolina

Court: US Supreme Court

v washington 373 u s 503 373 u s 510 511 1963 culombe v connecticut 367 u s 568 367 u

Miranda Vs. Arizona

Court: US Supreme Court

of important respects footnote 3 6 page 384 u s 511 even those who would readily enlarge the privilege must concede

Elfbrandt Vs. Russell

Court: US Supreme Court

..... to all the penalties for perjury in addition upon conviction under this section the officer or employee shall be deemed discharged from said office or ..... gave 2385 in scales see 378 u s at 378 u s 511 n 9 the statute as we read it covered membership which was ..... organization see aptheker v secretary of state supra at 378 u s 511 the unconstitutionality of this act follows a fortiori from speiser v randall .....

Graham Vs. John Deere Co.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... to change the general level of patentable invention we conclude that the section was intended merely as a codification of judicial precedents embracing the hotchkiss ..... way it is patentable jeoffroy mfg inc v graham 219 f 2d 511 cert denied 350 u s 826 in 1964 the eighth circuit held ..... previously testified similarly in jeoffoy mfg inc v graham 219 f 2d 511 footnote 14 the patent is u s no 2 870 943 .....

Seagram and Sons Vs. Hostetter

Court: US Supreme Court

..... law regulating intoxicating beverages must begin with the twenty first amendment the second section of which provides that the transportation or importation into any state territory ..... footnote 13 see baldwin v g a f seelig 294 u s 511 no such situation is presented in this case the mere fact that ..... u s 189 baldwin v g a f seelig 294 u s 511 294 u s 528 moreover as the court of appeals observed the .....