Section 511 - Judgment Search Results

Bhagirath Vs. Delhi Administration

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1985SC1050; (1985)85BOMLR400; 1985CriLJ1179; 1985(1)Crimes832(SC); 1985(1)SCALE719; (1985)2SCC580; [1985]3SCR743

..... purpose nor indeed can we draw sustenance to our conclusion from the provision contained in section 511 to the effect that whoever attempts to commit an offence punishable with imprisonment for life ..... of criminal procedure criminal life imprisonment sections 428 432 433 and 433 a of criminal procedure code 1973 and sections 53 57 65 304 305 307 394 and 511 of indian penal code 1860 petitioners .....

income-tax Officer Vs. Kaluram

Court: Madhya Pradesh

Reported in: (1986)55CTR(MP)451; [1985]156ITR748(MP)

..... of the indian penal code and under section 277 of the income ..... section 200 of the criminal procedure code against the respondent who is an income tax assessee for an offence under section 420 read with section 511 ..... which he did not resort the inherent power under section 482 criminal procedure code cannot be exercised therefore this petition .....

Ashok Kumar and anr. Vs. State (Delhi Admn.)

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 29(1986)DLT172

..... contended that conviction of the accused ramesh chandra should have been only under section 384 read with section 511 and not under section 506 the contention was made in view of the fact that the ..... the appellant was clearly guilty of the offence of criminal intimidation in this respect section 387 differs from section 386 which provides for punishment of a person who commits extortion by putting any .....

Kapoor Chand Maganlal Chanderia Vs. Delhi State (Administration)

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: 1985(1)Crimes987(SC); 1985(1)SCALE1003; 1985Supp(1)SCC268; [1985]3SCR773; 1985(17)LC816(SC)

..... served in directing another prosecution of the appellant for an alleged offence punishable under section 420 rend with section 511 of the indian penal code the contention must in cur opinion be accepted ..... made by appellant he was not entitled to be punished under section 420 read with section 511 held appellant entitled for acquittal section 100 dr arijit pasayat a k ganguly jj substantial question .....

United States Vs. Sharpe

Court: US Supreme Court

..... or flashing light shall constitute prima facie evidence of a violation of this section footnote 3 7 the court of appeals did not discuss this issue ..... n investigative detention must be temporary id at 460 u s 510 511 brennan j concurring in result a ny suggestion that the terry reasonable ..... stop reasonable florida v royer 460 u s at 460 u s 511 n concurring in result see also n 1 supra footnote 3 12 .....

Mitchell Vs. Forsyth

Court: US Supreme Court

..... of wire and oral communications see 18 u s c 2510 2520 one section of that act 2511 3 1976 ed specifically exempted any wire or ..... 335 argued february 27 1985 decided june 19 1985 472 u s 511 certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the third circuit ..... by 201 c of the foreign intelligence surveillance act pub l 95 511 92 stat 1797 footnote 2 the court also suggested that mitchell should .....

NLRB Vs. Int'l Longshoremen's Assn.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... dispute could be resolved through collective bargaining with respect to these sections congress targeted union activity which raised restraints on trade that if ..... effort to preserve jobs 447 u s at 447 u s 511 b we accept the board s factual findings as supported by ..... was not appropriate for initial consideration by reviewing courts id at 511 on remand the alj found that someone must still move cargo .....

Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. Vs. Ward

Court: US Supreme Court

co v harding 272 u s at 272 u s 511 southern r co v greene 216 u s at 216

Bank of Maharashtra Vs. United Construction Co. and ors.

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: AIR1985Bom432; ILR1985Bom1856

deposited in the said account a sum of rs 14 511 01 by way of a transfer entry and after this

Webb Vs. Bd. of Educ. of Dyer County

Court: US Supreme Court

..... also observed that under the contrary rule p laintiffs seeking relief under section 1983 would be compelled to oppose any move from federal court despite ..... as part of the costs footnote 2 tenn code ann 49 5 511 a 1983 no teacher shall be dismissed except as provided in this ..... footnote 2 12 see e g ciechon v chicago 686 f 2d 511 525 ca7 1982 sustaining award of fees for administrative work because t .....