Court : Delhi
..... of witnesses.2. briefly stated, the relevant facts of the case are that the respondent/husband has filed a petition against the appellant under section 11 of the hindu marriage act praying inter alia for a decree of divorce. after completion of the pleadings in the petition, issues were framed on 31.07.2013 and the parties were directed to file .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... the absence of any specific direction/finding, it cannot be urged in the present contempt proceedings that by levying rs.1,38,600/- as conversion penalty, the respondent-dda has acted in wilful disobedience of any court order.13. accordingly, present contempt petition and pending applications are closed. cont.cas(c) 533/2010 page 6 of 7 14. however, petitioner is ..... over.11. the supreme court in all india anna dravida munnetra kazhagam vs. l.k. tripathi and ors., (2009) 5 scc417has held that contempt of court is a quasi criminal act and as such the standard of proof required is that of a criminal proceeding and the breach or wilful disobedience has to be established beyond all reasonable doubt.12. consequently .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... .2005/sho/vasant vihar dt. 10.11.09 in connection with the present case, same were marked to pw-19 for biological and seriological examination. pw-19 ms. seema nain, sr. scientific officer, further deposed that on examination, all the parcels were tallied with the sample seals provided in the forwarding authority letter and based on biological ..... would like to mention here that the recovery of the scooter and knife pursuant to the disclosure statement of the appellant were covered by section 27 of the evidence act 1872 which reads as under:-" 27. how much of information received from appellant may be proved. provided that, when any fact is deposed to as discovered in ..... the recovery of the scooter and knife in pursuance of the disclosure statement of the appellant are admissible in evidence as per section 27 of the indian evidence act 1872.38. learned counsel for the appellant submitted that there are contradictions in the testimony of pw-3 and other witnesses but he has failed to point any .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... petitioner claims that the requirement of experience was relaxed qua the petitioner. learned counsel submits that when the petitioner asked for the relevant file notings under the right to information act to establish her claim of relaxation of the recruitment rules in her case, the response received from the respondent is that the said file notings are not available. therefore, there .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... union of india & anr., has taken the same view.12. having regard to the aforesaid position, the captioned writ petitions are disposed of with a direction to the respondents to act as per the directions contained in the aforementioned judgments. w.p. (c) 1663/2018,1669/2018 page 3 of 4 13. it is made clear that the directions contained ..... exim pvt. ltd., these petitioners are inclined to approach registrar of companies voluntarily to seek its striking off from the registrar of companies under section 248(2) of the companies act, 2013. 10.1 furthermore, the petitioners seek to take benefit of the condonation of delay scheme 2018 as was permitted by another single judge of this court vide a ..... .1 the stand of the respondents, is that, this list, which includes the names of the petitioners has been prepared in consonance with section 164(2)(a) of the companies act, 2013. w.p. (c) 1663/2018,1669/2018 page 2 of 4 9. to be noted, except for the petitioner in wp(c) 1663/2018, the other petitioner is .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... union of india & anr., has taken the same view.12. having regard to the aforesaid position, the captioned writ petitions are disposed of with a direction to the respondents to act as per the directions contained in the aforementioned judgments. w.p. (c) 1663/2018,1669/2018 page 3 of 4 13. it is made clear that the directions contained ..... exim pvt. ltd., these petitioners are inclined to approach registrar of companies voluntarily to seek its striking off from the registrar of companies under section 248(2) of the companies act, 2013. 10.1 furthermore, the petitioners seek to take benefit of the condonation of delay scheme 2018 as was permitted by another single judge of this court vide a ..... .1 the stand of the respondents, is that, this list, which includes the names of the petitioners has been prepared in consonance with section 164(2)(a) of the companies act, 2013. w.p. (c) 1663/2018,1669/2018 page 2 of 4 9. to be noted, except for the petitioner in wp(c) 1663/2018, the other petitioner is .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... the guidelines and policy framed for regularisation of unauthorized colonies and the provisions of national capital territory of laws (special provisions) second act, 2011; and d) issue a writ in the- nature of mandamus thereby directing the respondent no.l to take final decision with respect to regularisation of ..... petitioner association; and c) issue a writ in the nature of declaration declaring the act of the respondents in threatening to take action for demolition in respect of the properties of the members of the petitioner association as being in violation of ..... to abide by the policy and guidelines framed in respect of unauthorized colonies and the provisions of national capital territory of delhi laws (special provisions) second act, 2011 and not to take any contrary and arbitrary action of pick and choose of demolition/ dispossession in respect of the properties of the members of the .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... time the respondents take requisite decision with regard to the request of the petitioners made to them in consonance with the provisions under section 248 (2) of the companies act, 2013 and under the condonation of delay scheme, 2018. 4.3 needful will be done by the petitioners within four weeks from today. in addition thereto, for the ..... will apply to the petitioners mutatis mutandis. 4.1 the petitioners will, however, take steps both in consonance with the provisions of section 248 (2) of the companies act, 2013 and under the condonation of delay scheme, 2018 within a period of four weeks from today. 4.2 in order to facilitate this exercise, operation of the ..... 3.2. counsel for the petitioners says that since the petitioners do not wish to revive isbl, they would take steps under section 248 (2) of the companies act, 2013 in consonance with the directives contained in sandeep singh (supra). 3.3 furthermore, counsel for the petitioners says that the petitioners would also like to avail the .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... time the respondents take requisite decision with regard to the request of the petitioner made to them in consonance with the provisions under section 248 (2) of the companies act, 2013 and under the condonation of delay scheme, 2018. 4.3 needful will be done by the petitioner within two weeks from today. in addition thereto, for the ..... will apply to the petitioner mutatis mutandis. 4.1 the petitioner will, however, take steps both in consonance with the provisions of section 248 (2) of the companies act, 2013 and under the condonation of delay scheme, 2018 within a period of two weeks from today. 4.2 in order to facilitate this exercise, operation of the ..... 3.2 counsel for the petitioner says that since the petitioners do not wish to revive (cbh), they would take steps under section 248 (2) of the companies act, 2013 in consonance with the directives contained in sandeep singh (supra). 3.3 furthermore, counsel for the petitioner says that the petitioners would also like to avail the .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... time the respondents take requisite decision with regard to the request of the petitioner made to them in consonance with the provisions under section 248 (2) of the companies act, 2013 and under the condonation of delay scheme, 2018. 4.3 needful will be done by the petitioner within two weeks from today. in addition thereto, for the ..... will apply to the petitioner mutatis mutandis. 4.1 the petitioner will, however, take steps both in consonance with the provisions of section 248 (2) of the companies act, 2013 and under the condonation of delay scheme, 2018 within a period of two weeks from today. 4.2 in order to facilitate this exercise, operation of the ..... 3.2. counsel for the petitioner says that since the petitioner does not wish to revive (akst), he would take steps under section 248 (2) of the companies act, 2013 in consonance with the directives contained in sandeep singh (supra). 3.3 furthermore, counsel for the petitioner says that the petitioner would also like to avail the benefit .....
Tag this Judgment!