Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Principal Bench New Delhi
..... j) applicants in this joint original application are serving as senior field assistants(m) [ sfas(m) for short] and assistant field officers(m) [ afos(m) for short] in sashastra seema bal ( ssb for short) under the ministry of home affairs. they are aggrieved by the alleged illegal, arbitrary and discriminatory action on the part of the respondents in not giving them ..... . the operative part of the said order reads as under:- shri atma prakash dixist and others have filed this original application under section 19 of the administrative tribunals act, 1985 seeking direction to be issued to the respondents to grant them higher grade pay of rs.2800 w.e.f. 01.01.2006 with all consequential benefits ..... also they were granted the same pay scale at par with others but lesser grade pay. 13. we are, therefore, of the considered view that the respondents have acted in violation of articles 14 and 16 of the constitution of india in granting lesser grade pay to the sfa, afo, fo etc. of ssb from sfa, afo, .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Principal Bench New Delhi
..... employee or the clearance in the disciplinary proceedings or acquittal in the criminal proceedings is with benefit of doubt or on account of non-availability of evidence due to the acts attributable to the employee etc. in such circumstances, the concerned authorities must be vested with the power to decide whether the employee at all deserves any salary for the intervening ..... .2003 with the observation that his attempt was to reargue the issue which was outside the scope of review in terms of section 22 (3) (f) of the administrative tribunals act, 1985 read with order 47 of civil procedure code. thereafter, the applicant filed yet another o.a. no.2801/2003 and it was also dismissed vide order dated 31.08.2004. the .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Principal Bench New Delhi
..... he so desires. 17. the learned counsel for the respondents has also submitted that the disciplinary authority, the appellate authority and the revisionary authority have acted independently and passed reasoned and speaking order after going through the charge sheet, documents available on record, evidences adduced during the inquiry, inquiry report and ..... of the vigilance department. he has also stated that the disciplinary authority did not apply his independent mind in deciding the matter, rather he was acting on the behest of the vigilance department. he has also submitted that the appellate authority actually wanted to reduce the penalty by imposing the penalty ..... are available as documentary evidence ex p-15. thus this charge is also proved against you. the above shows that you were responsible for various acts leading to loss to railway and also shows that your intentions were doubtful. however, taking a compassionate view looking your family condition the punishment of .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Principal Bench New Delhi
..... the respondent and considering the charge against the respondent and disposal of the cases as compromised with admonition and benefit under section 3 of the probation of offenders act concluded the respondent to be habitual of picking up quarrels and resorting to violence and his such attitude rendering him unsuitable. it is thus not as if ..... his wife smt.rampati was also sitting with him. suddenly you along with narayan, bharal lal s.o ram nath, jella ram s/o sunder lal all resident of bal ki dhani, mundiyawas, the. thana gazi distt. alwar (raj.) having lathies in their hands came to his house and pappu ram, ramesh, narayan, bharat lal, jella ..... moral turpitude, disentitling the convict to public employment; 33. we are a little surprised at the list as it excludes offences such as promoting enmity or doing acts prejudicial to maintenance of harmony i.e. offences punishable under section 153-a ipc. it excludes offences pertaining to mutiny and its abetment i.e. offences under sections .....
Tag this Judgment!