Court : Delhi
..... arrangement till complete infrastructure for regular water supply is in place.2. in its affidavit, respondent no. 2, delhi jal board, has stated that in terms of delhi jal board act, 1998, it is the responsibility of the developing agency, which, in this case is dda, to develop internal system of the colony. it is further stated in the reply that .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... employees or the clearance in the disciplinary proceedings or acquittal in the criminal proceedings is with benefit of doubt or on account of non-availability of evidence due to the acts attributable to the employee etc. in such circumstances, the concerned authorities must be vested with the power to decide whether the employee at all deserves any salary for the intervening ..... of suspension involved in the present case is 30.03.1999 to 29.09.2009.2. to be noted, the petitioner was implicated under the provisions of prevention of corruption act, 1988 and indian penal code, 1860 (in short ipc). 2.1 in view of a fir being registered against the petitioner, as indicated above, the petitioner was placed under deemed .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... prosecution.5. it is also stated that in view of the evidence of the witnesses, the learned trial court ought to have raised presumption under section 113b of the evidence act, which presumption has not been rebutted by respondent nos.2 to 8.6. the prosecution case in nutshell is that sheela was admitted in the hospital by her husband on .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... from time to time has been agitating his rights and now in view of section 3(3) of the street vendors (protection of livelihood and regulations of street vending) act, 2014 (hereinafter the act ), thus, the w.p.(c).4854/2017 page 1 of 4 petitioner cannot be removed. the petitioner has placed various receipts/challans of the years 1997, 2003, 2004 ..... squatter which is evident from the challans placed on record. mr.sharma further contends that no benefit can accrue to the petitioner in view of section 3(3) of the act for the reason that the name of the petitioner does not find mentioned in the list prepared by the ndmc or by the chopra committee. the counter affidavit filed by ..... neither holds a tehbazari licence nor has his name in any list prepared by the respondent no.1 and thus, cannot claim the protection under section 3 (3) of the act.6. even further, learned counsel for the respondent has handed over in court a copy of the order dated 03.05.2017 passed by a division bench of this court .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... from time to time has been agitating his rights and now in view of section 3(3) of the street vendors (protection of livelihood and regulations of street vending) act, 2014 (hereinafter the act ), thus, the w.p.(c).4858/2017 page 1 of 4 petitioner cannot be removed. the petitioner has placed various receipts/challans of the years 1978, 1979, 1980 ..... squatter which is evident from the challans placed on record. ms.nayyar further contends that no benefit can accrue to the petitioner in view of section 3(3) of the act for the reason that the name of the petitioner does not find mention in the list prepared by the ndmc or by the chopra committee. the counter affidavit filed by ..... neither holds a tehbazari licence nor has his name in any list prepared by the respondent no.1 and thus, cannot claim the protection under section 3 (3) of the act.6. even further, learned counsel for the respondent has handed over in court a copy of the order dated 03.05.2017 passed by a division bench of this court .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... . date of decision :13. h november, 2017 coram: hon'ble mr. justice manmohan judgment manmohan, j: (oral) 1. present petition has been filed under section 276 of the indian succession act for grant of probate of will dated 09th august, 2008 of deceased sh. man mohan diddee.2. in the petition it has been averred that the petitioners are the daughters .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... : mr. nakul jain, advocate. coram:-"hon'ble mr. justice rajiv shakdher % rajiv shakdher, j.(oral) 1. this is an application filed under sections 11 & 12 of the contempt of courts act, 1971. the assertion of the applicant is that the respondent company is in breach of the directions contained in order dated 12.12.2017.2. a perusal of the order .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... , the petitioner s review application has been dismissed. the petitioner, as it appears, had made a request for issuance of certificate of naturalization under section 6(1) of the citizenship act, 1955.6. the impugned decision dated 21.12.2017 was, however, rendered ex-parte since the petitioner had not appeared on the date and time fixed for hearing. a perusal .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... sought to be argued before me, which, is that the petitioner has copyright in the book in respect of which he claims royalty and that the provisions of the copyright act, 1957 allow w.p.(c) 8086/2011 page 1 of 2 him to sue the state of united republic of tanzania, in india even though no cause of action has .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... w.p.(c)1895/2018 page 2 of 3 statutory authority. an undertaking in that behalf will be filed with the court within two weeks from today. the sdm will act on the order passed by this court.8. the petition and cm no.7865/2018 shall stand disposed of in the aforementioned terms.9. dasti. march08 2018 rb rajiv shakdher .....
Tag this Judgment!