Court : Delhi
..... exceptions. o.m.p.(misc.)(comm.) 151/2018 2. this is a joint petition preferred by the parties under section 29a(4) of the arbitration and conciliation act, 1996 (hereafter referred to as 1996 act ) for extension of time to conclude the arbitral proceedings.3. as per the averments made in the petition, mr. padam kant saxena, (retired) adj was appointed as .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... . 641/2018 1. aggrieved by the judgment dated 5th june 2018, whereby the learned metropolitan magistrate acquitted the respondent no.2 for the offence punishable under section 138 negotiable instruments act, 1881 in cc no.56titled as "radhey v. kuldeep kumar", the petitioner/complainant has preferred the present leave petition.2. facts leading to the present case as per the complaint ..... .cw-1/6, internet crl.l.p. 641/2018 page 2 of 4 generated delivery report of legal notice vide ex.cw-and complaint under section 138 of negotiable instruments act vide ex. cw-1/8.5. statement of respondent no.2 was recorded under section 313 cr.p.c. wherein he took the same plea as taken by him under .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... : hon'ble mr. justice rajiv shakdher rajiv shakdher, j.(oral) 1 this is a petition seeking appointment of an arbitrator under section 11 of the arbitration and conciliation act, 1996 (in short 1996 act ). 2 notice in this petition was issued on 20.11.2017. after several attempts, it appears that the respondent has been served. despite service, there was no appearance ..... the supreme court, is appointed as an arbitrator in the matter. the learned arbitrator will be paid fees as per the provisions of the fourth schedule appended to the 1996 act. 10.1 the petition is disposed of in the aforesaid terms.11. the registry will dispatch a copy of this order to the learned arb. p. no.734 of 2017 .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... . vipin chaudhary, advs. coram: hon'ble mr. justice rajiv shakdher rajiv shakdher, j.: (oral) 1 this is a petition filed under section 11 of the arbitration and conciliation act, 1996 (in short 1996 act ). the petitioner seeks appointment of an arbitrator as despite a notice being issued to the respondents, the respondents have not appointed an arbitrator to adjudicate the disputes arising ..... , andhra pradesh high court (mobile no.9419000938) is appointed as an arbitrator in the matter. learned arbitrator will be paid fees as per the fourth schedule appended to the 1996 act.12. in view of the fact that the respondents took two dates to file a reply and today, via mr. singh conveyed that they did not wish to file a .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... stand vacated. (ii) the respondent before me, i.e., punj lloyd ltd., shall have liberty to move an application under section 17 of the arbitration and conciliation act, 1996 before the learned arbitrator at the earliest for grant of appropriate security by the appellants before me. (iii) in case such an application is moved, the ..... dated 2.7.2018 concerns punj lloyd malaysia and not the respondent before me, that is, punj lloyd ltd.3. in effect, the adjudicator acting under cipaa has partially allowed the respondent s claim vis.-a.-vis. punj lloyd malaysia, which, as indicated above, has been assailed before the high court of ..... mr. krishanan that punj lloyd malaysia has taken recourse to a statutory remedy under section 15 of a malaysian statute, that is, the construction industry payment and adjudication act, 2012 (cipaa) and those proceedings are pending before the malaysian high court. 2.3 furthermore, what is also not in dispute is that the adjudicatory order .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... the main objections, which has been raised against the purported award, is that, it is not an award as envisaged under the provisions of the arbitration and conciliation act, 1996 (in short 1996 act ). 1.1 this objection has been raised, in particular, by mr. singla, learned senior counsel, who appears in ex. appl. (os) no.531/2018. the said application has .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... her mandate had already expired.6. it appears that since the learned arbitrator has ruled against the respondent, the respondent seeks to contest the captioned application.7. of the 1996 act has not been filed as yet.8. since the application for extension raises a legal issue, it will have to be decided in the first instance. however, clearly, it is ..... dated 25.08.2018 is null and void, as it was passed by the learned arbitrator after the time prescribed under section 29a (1) and (3) of arbitration and conciliation act, 1996 had expired.4. mr. sumit kumar, who, appears for the petitioner does not dispute the fact that time had expired before learned arbitrator could render the award in the .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... next date of hearing, the defendant, its proprietor, partners, agents, assigns, representatives, heirs, servants, dealers, distributors, franchisees and/or anyone acting for and on their behalf are restrained from opening any further outlet trade mark/label hira using confectioners and the line "shahdara kimashoorbalushahikenirmata". the ..... its proprietor, partners, associates, sister concerns, dealers, distributors through themselves and through servants, agents, assigns and representatives and all other acting for and on their behalf from manufacturing, selling, offering for sale advertising directly and indirectly dealing in impugned goods included in class- ..... its proprietor, partners, associates, sister concerns, dealers, distributors through themselves and through servants, agents, assigns and representatives and all other acting for and on their behalf from manufacturing, selling, offering for sale advertising directly and indirectly dealing in impugned goods included in class- .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... suffered by the accused does not result in the testimony of the prosecution witnesses to be outrightly rejected. if the court finds it probable that the accused might have acted in exercise of right of selfdefence, the court ought to proceed to consider whether they have exceeded the same. [(1994) 2 scc191state of u.p. v. ..... and in default to undergo simple imprisonment for two months concerning the injuries inflicted upon bittoo and balvinder, attributing intention or knowledge to the two that by their acts they would have committed an offence of culpable homicide not amounting to murder. the two have been sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for two years and pay ..... is : as per mohan lal and vicky the incident was triggered by meena, bittoo, balvinder and their mother chand rani, compelling mohan lal and vicky to act in discharge of their right to private defence during which meena, bittoo and balvinder were injured; and as per the prosecution, mohan lal and his three sons and .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... suffered by the accused does not result in the testimony of the prosecution witnesses to be outrightly rejected. if the court finds it probable that the accused might have acted in exercise of right of selfdefence, the court ought to proceed to consider whether they have exceeded the same. [(1994) 2 scc191state of u.p. v. ..... and in default to undergo simple imprisonment for two months concerning the injuries inflicted upon bittoo and balvinder, attributing intention or knowledge to the two that by their acts they would have committed an offence of culpable homicide not amounting to murder. the two have been sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for two years and pay ..... is : as per mohan lal and vicky the incident was triggered by meena, bittoo, balvinder and their mother chand rani, compelling mohan lal and vicky to act in discharge of their right to private defence during which meena, bittoo and balvinder were injured; and as per the prosecution, mohan lal and his three sons and .....
Tag this Judgment!