Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: sashastra seema bal act 2007 section 145 orders pending suspension of sentence Court: delhi Page 13 of about 203 results (0.421 seconds)

Commissioner of Income Tax Delhi Iv Vs. Dlf Universal Ltd.

Court : Delhi

..... the matters to become final. the itat also noticed that hundi discounting charges was a different nomenclature of interest paid which is governed by section 36(1)(iii) of the act. the itat noted the definition of interest in section 2(28a). the impugned order took note of the supreme court judgment in madhav ita11362009 page 2 prasad jatia v. cit .....

Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Samtel Electron Devices Ltd.

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi

Reported in : (2006)100TTJ(Delhi)706

..... stands established.16. the second alternative contention was to the effect that at any rate the claim of interest, if it is not allowable under section 36(iii) of the act in computing the business income, is allowable under section 57(iii) while computing the income from other sources. this claim has found favour with the tribunal in its order for ..... . we are concerned with the asst. yr. 1991-92 for which the previous year ended on 31st march, 1991. the assessment was originally framed under section 143(3) of the it act, but on appeal it was set aside by the cit(a) with the direction, inter alia, to consider afresh the disallowance of the interest. accordingly, the assessment was reframed on .....

Gopendra Mohan Gupta and ors. Vs. State

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 2009CriLJ2098

..... fir that she received summons from the civil court on 16th october 2007 in the application filed by the husband under section 9 of the hindu marriage act 1955 ('hma'). personal meetings were organized between the parties at the request of the learned civil judge but no settlement was arrived at on account of petitioners' attitude. ..... determined at the trial.7. the second document relied upon by learned counsel for the petitioner is an affidavit dated 22nd july 2008 filed by the complainant in hma no. 613 of 2007 before the learned additional district judge ('adj'), delhi. in this affidavit the complainant termed the incident of 24th november 2006 as an unfortunate ..... by the complainant before the sdm and the affidavit dated 22nd july 2008 before the learned adj. significantly the husband, after filing an application under section 9 hma, conveniently withdrew it on 1st august 2008 after the above affidavit was filed by the complainant offering to return to the matrimonial home. so much for the .....

Northern Coalfields Ltd. Vs. Heavy Engineering Corpn. Ltd. and anr.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 2007(3)ARBLR442(Delhi); 146(2008)DLT650

..... works and services. it would be pertinent to note that under the permanent machinery of arbitration, as applicable at that time, it was specifically provided that the arbitration act, 1940 shall not be applicable. it was also provided that the award of the arbitrator shall be binding upon the parties in dispute provided, however, any party ..... at this juncture, it would be relevant to note that although the contract dated 21.09.1988 required the reference to arbitration under the provisions of the arbitration act, 1940, that clause had been superseded by virtue of the establishment of the permanent machinery of arbitration, which was set up to take care of the commercial ..... clause whereby the disputes between ncl and hec were to be referred for settlement through arbitration and the arbitration was to be conducted under the provisions of the arbitration act, 1940. 4. within 45 days of the said contract dated 21.09.1988 between ncl and hec, hec allegedly sub-contracted the entire work to rec ( .....

Sanjeev Bhatiani Vs. Chief Executive Officer and anr

Court : Delhi

..... on 14.9.2012. the notices thus indicate that despite receiving notice from time to time, the petitioner continued to make construction.3. section 340 of cantonment act, 2006 provides that any person aggrieved by any order described in the third column of schedule v may appeal to the appellate authority specified in that behalf in ..... section 248 of the cantonment act, 2006, directed the petitioner to stop erection/re-erection in the aforesaid property and also directed that the erection completed by him should be demolished within 30 days ..... the occupant of the property bearing number iii/i/2e, shastri bazar, delhi cantt-10 which is situated in delhi cantonment area and is therefore governed by the cantonment act, 2006. vide notice dated 13.7.2012, the chief executive officer of delhi cantonment, in exercise of the powers conferred upon him by sub section (1) of .....

Haryana Roadways Delhi Vs. Sushila Devi and ors.

Court : Delhi

..... informant of fir and statement of pw2 sangram singh is contrary to each other, therefore, none of the statement can be relied upon.5. to establish the rash and negligent act of the driver of vehicle whether deceased nand lal had died in motor vehicle accident due to rash and negligent driving of vehicle not h55b-8458, driven by r-1 .....

Rajiv Gupta Vs. Delhi Development Authority

Court : Delhi

..... passed by the forum and has overlooked its own fault.12. on the other hand, ms. shobhna takiar, learned counsel for respondent- dda submits that respondent has acted fairly and reasonably in the present case inasmuch as the inadvertent error in allotting the flat no. 74 was rectified suo moto by dda within a period of four ..... had only directed payment of costs and not granted any other relief to the petitioner.11. ms. leena, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that respondent- dda has acted arbitrarily in issuing the cancellation order and that too without complying with the principles of natural justice. she further submits that respondent-dda has misinterpreted the order dated 6th ..... and in a manner that the o.p. had been negligent in performance of the service so far the allotment of flat in question to the complainant. the act of o.p. in displaying the name of complainant for the flat which does not exist at site amount to deficiency of services however, vide letter dated 30 .....

Denso India Ltd Vs. Technico Industries Ltd

Court : Delhi

..... respondents: mr n.k. bhardwaj, adv. coram :hon'ble mr justice rajiv shakdher rajiv shakdher, j1 this is a petition filed under section 11 of the arbitration & conciliation act, 1996 (in short the act) for appointment of an arbitrator. notice in this petition was issued on 31.05.2013. since then the respondent has entered appearance and filed its reply. the petition .....

Spml Infra Limited Vs. Ntpc Limited and anr

Court : Delhi

..... omp12742013 allowed subject to just exceptions. omp no.1273/2013 and omp no.1274/2013 1. the captioned petitions have been filed under section 9 of the arbitration and conciliation act, 1996.2. mr. nayar says that the prayers made in the captioned petitions are common, save and except the amounts referred to therein.3. broadly, the prayer sought is that .....

Spml Infra Ltd Vs. Ntpc Limited and anr

Court : Delhi

..... omp12742013 allowed subject to just exceptions. omp no.1273/2013 and omp no.1274/2013 1. the captioned petitions have been filed under section 9 of the arbitration and conciliation act, 1996.2. mr. nayar says that the prayers made in the captioned petitions are common, save and except the amounts referred to therein.3. broadly, the prayer sought is that .....