Skip to content
How to use Narrow results with filters
  1. Run a keyword search first to load the results page.
  2. Select Supreme Court, a High Court, or tribunal on the left.
  3. Optionally filter by decision year to focus on recent or historical cases.

Rope - Judgment Search Results

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Aug 01 2008

Garware-wall Ropes Ltd. Vs. A.i. Chopra Engineers and Contr. and anr.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Aug-01-2008

ORDERS.H. Kapadia and B. Sudershan Reddy, JJ.1. Leave granted.2. This Civil Appeal is filed by the original Plaintiff against the Order dated, 19th December, 2007 passed by the Bombay High Court (Nagpur Bench) in A.O. No....


May 07 1980

Shalimar Rope Works Ltd. Vs. Abdul HussaIn H.M. Hasanbhai Rassiwala an ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: May-07-1980

Reported in: AIR1980SC1163; (1980)3SCC595; [1980]3SCR1028; 1980(12)LC606(SC)

Matched in: Parties Shalimar Rope Works Ltd. Vs. Abdul HussaIn H.M. Hasanbhai Rassiwala and ors.


Dec 18 2008

Garware Wall Ropes Ltd. a Company Incorporated Under the Companies Act ...

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Dec-18-2008

Reported in: 2009(3)BomCR896; 2009(111)BomLR479

parties.2. Being aggrieved by the order, below Exh. 4, dated 18.6.2007 in Civil Suit No. 2/2007 (Garware Wall Ropes Limited.v. A.I. Chopra and Anr.), rejecting the application for grant of temporary injunction filed by the appellant/plaintiff, the


18-section briefs on any result in this list

Dec 19 2007

Garware-wall Ropes Ltd. Vs. A.i. Chopra and anr.

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Dec-19-2007

Reported in: LC2009(1)197; (2008)3MLJ599

tender document, Railways made it abundantly clear that the product being supplied was (1) manufactured by Garware Wall Ropes Ltd., i.e., plaintiff, or any other manufacturer (page 137 of the paper-book), (2) supply was to be backed


Apr 25 2008

Garware-wall Ropes Ltd. Vs. Techfab India and 5 ors.

Court: Gujarat

Decided on: Apr-25-2008

Reported in: LC2008(3)192

is the case of the appellant that the appellant is a well reputed manufacturer and seller of synthetic ropes, twines and yarns, nettings and various rope products including Geosynthetic products and systems. One of such products manufactured


Oct 12 2009

Garware-wall Ropes Limited Geosynthetic Division Vs. Marg Limited (For ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Oct-12-2009

Reported in: (2009)8MLJ1585

M. Chockalingam, J.1. This appeal has arisen from the order of the learned Single Judge of this Court allowing an application in O.A. No. 1202 of 2008 filed by the first respondent/plaintiff seeking for interim injunction...


Jul 13 2004

Shalimar Rope Works Ltd. (In Liquidation) and ors. Vs. Official Liquid ...

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Jul-13-2004

Reported in: [2005(105)FLR752],(2005)ILLJ1165Cal

37 alleged workmen individually making the Official Liquidator, one Champdany Industries Limited, and two trade unions being Shalimar Rope Works Staff and Workers Association and Shalimar Rope Workers Majdoor Union as party respondents therein. They have applied


Nov 20 2012

Zenith Ropes Pvt Ltd Vs. Union of India

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Nov-20-2012

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of decision:20. 11.2012 + FAO(OS) 192/2012 ZENITH ROPES PVT LTD ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Suhail Dutt, Sr.Adv. with Mr.Saran Suri and Mr.Gunjan Kumar, Advocates. Versus UNION OF


Oct 21 1992

Asian Wire Ropes Ltd. Vs. Delhi Special Police Establishment

Court: Karnataka

Decided on: Oct-21-1992

Reported in: ILR1993KAR186

ORDERShivappa, J. 1. These three Petitions are filed by M/S.Asian Wire Ropes Ltd., represented by Sri M.Janakiram. All these cases are clubbed and heard together and a common Order is


Jul 12 2000

Bharat Wire Rope Manufacturing Co. Vs. Uoi (Dgsandd)

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Jul-12-2000

Reported in: 2000(3)ARBLR152(Delhi); 86(2000)DLT777; 2000(54)DRJ801

ORDERVikramajit Sen, J.1. The facts relevant for the disposal of the applications are that on 22.7.1980 a contract was placed on the Petitioner by the Respondents for the supply of two commodities/stores. One was duly supplied....


  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »
Loading chart…

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial