Right Hand - Judgment Search Results

Harding Vs. Hand

Court: US Supreme Court

HARDING v. HAND - 369 U.S. 151 (1962) U.S. Supreme Court HARDING v. HAND, 369 U.S. 151 (1962) 369 U.S. 151

Tyler Vs. Hand

Court: US Supreme Court

and as the demurrer admitted the facts stated in the declaration, the defendant was estopped from contesting the right of the obligee to sue. Page 48 U. S. 574 So also it was not a valid reason … Tyler v. Hand - 48 U.S. 573 (1849) U.S. Supreme Court Tyler v. Hand, 48 U.S. 7 How. 573 573 (1849)

Security Warehousing Co. Vs. Hand

Court: US Supreme Court

adjudged a bankrupt, and the appellees were appointed receivers and were later elected trustees. The appellees asserted the right to certain merchandise covered by receipts issued by the appellants, the security company, which company thereupon filed in … Security Warehousing Co. v. Hand - 206 U.S. 415 (1907) U.S. Supreme Court Security Warehousing Co. v. Hand, 206 U.S. 415 (1907) Security

Ramchandra Ganpatrao Hande Alias Handege Vs.

Court: Mumbai

the vesting of the property, to the liability of the executor for neglect. (vi) Section 269 is a right which is vested in a person interested (other than the executor) and confers powers on the Court to … :1. Sushila Vithalrao Hande is alleged to have executed a will on 2 October 2002. The Appellant is named as executor under

Krishna Hande Vs. Padmanabha Hande and ors.

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (1913)25MLJ442

Government Gazette were awarded by the Lower Courts.2. The first question argued is whether the Lower Courts were right in granting execution to the defendants Nos. 28 to 31 instead of to the 27th defendant. We are

M/S Hande Wavare and Co. Vs. Ramchandra Vitthal Dongre

Court: Supreme Court of India

the order of the High Court dated 07.05.1999 in W.P.No.2556 of 1999, Board of Directors of APMC has rightly taken the decision to conduct lottery amongst the eligible claimants and the same ought not to have been … COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.5350 2019 (Arising out of SLP(C) No.33627 of 2018) M/S HANDE WAVARE & CO. ...Appellant VERSUS RAMCHANDRA VITTHAL DONGRE & ORS. …Respondents WITH CIVIL APPEAL No.5351 2019 (Arising out

The Swastik Hand Made Paper Pcis Ltd. & Anr vs.m/s Toyin Woodcraft (In ...

Court: Delhi

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:21. 10.2019 + CO.PET. 169/2001 THE SWASTIK HAND MADE PAPER PCIS LTD. & ANR Through: ........ Petitioners versus M/S TOYIN WOODCRAFT (INDIA) PVT. LTD. ..... Respondent

Sarjerao Janardhan Hande and Others Vs. Maharashtra State Co-operative ...

Court: Mumbai

overtime. Here we are not concerned with the record of their regular service. 4 The Labour Court, therefore, rightly, considering the scope and purpose of Section 33(C) of Industrial Disputes Act and after considering the rival contentions … in Writ Petition No.950/2008 with Writ Petition No.1514/2008 M/s. Maharashtra State Co-op. Marketing Federation Ltd. vs. Sarjerao Janardhan Hande and anr. , is of no assistance in view of the distinguishing facts and circumstances. That was not

Parvatibai Maruti Hande Vs. Satish Mohanram Prajapati

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: (2001)4BOMLR516

the ground of arrears under Section 12 of the Bombay Rent Act. In thecircumstances, the Appellate Court was right in reversing the decree passedby the Trial Court and dismissing the suit for possession as filed by thepetitioner. … P.W. 1 and P.W. 2 respectively in support that the suit notice was duly served. On the other hand, defendant examined D.W. 1 Mohanram, who is the father of respondent herein. The Trial Court, after considering the

Fibre Hand (Sales) Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Chand Rani

Court: Delhi

Reported in: AIR1993Delhi201; 50(1993)DLT68; 1993(25)DRJ382; 1993RLR228

an owner of the property as the sole owner is, and till a partition takes place, has a right to possession of the entire property, and in this view of the matter, it was held that even … That period is already over. thereforee, grant fresh period of two months to the petitioner from today to hand over vacant possession of the tenancy premises to respondent No. 1. INTERPRETATION OF STATUTES - Welfare legislation should