Restrict - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: restrict Year: 2011 Page 1 of about 1,800 results (0.04 seconds)Ashok Residency Flat Owners Welfare Association, Rep. by Its President ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Jul-21-2011
oral order per sri r lakshminarasimha rao honble member dissatisfied with the order of the district forum ii east...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSterlite Industries (i) Ltd. Etc. Vs. Union of India and ors.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Oct-11-2011
..... to be solid waste stored within the stipulated disposal 10 hectares of land with a restricted stacking height of 12 meters so as to adhere with the safe load bearing capacity .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTShri Girish Vyas and anr. Vs. the State of Maharastra and ors.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Oct-12-2011
draft development plan or scheme or any part thereof any restriction imposed on any person against carrying out any development work
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBrown Vs. Entertainment Merchants Assn.
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-27-2011
..... to accompany children when playing a game in volving actual target practice or restricting the sale of toys presenting physical dangers to children see generally consumer product ..... from purchasing potentially harmful violent interactive material and there is no equally effective less restrictive alternative california s statute is consequently constitutional on its face though litigants remain .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTThe Tamil Nadu Spinning Mills Association, Represented Dindigul, and O ...
Court: Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL
Decided on: Jan-11-2011
..... 11 2008 about excess demand charges and excess energy charges for evening peak hours restriction besides restriction to 5 10 during the succeeding 48 hrs when such drastic charges for excess ..... state commission for the disconnection of supply of electricity for exceeding the quota during the restriction and control measures therefore the electricity board approached the state commission for the same .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTArizona Free Enterprise Club’s Freedom Club Pac Vs. Bennett
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-23-2011
..... so one candidate s expenditure of personal funds on campaign speech triggered discriminatory contribution restrictions favoring that candidate s opponent under the first amendment the similarity between davis ..... two great fault lines run through our first amendment doctrine one between speech restrictions and speech subsidies and the other between discriminatory and neutral government action see .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSorrell Vs. Ims Health Inc.
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-23-2011
..... in central hudson this statute is constitutional iv what about the statute s third restriction providing that p harmaceutical manufacturers and pharmaceutical marketers may not use prescriber identifiable ..... that the statute before us satisfies the intermediate standards this court has applied to restrictions on commercial speech a fortiori it satisfies less demanding standards that are more .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTFederation of Indian Airlines and ors. Vs. Union of India and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-04-2011
..... the practice adopted in several other countries for civil aviation safety and security by restricting ground handling services to only the airport authority and the national carrier and their ..... by the central government to provide ground handling services at such aerodromes without any restriction these ground handling service providers shall however be subject to security clearance of the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTEurotex Industries and Exports Limited and anr. Vs. Union of India and ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Mar-09-2011
..... notification dated 22122010 reads thus notification no 14 re2010 200914new delhi dated 22nd december 2010subject restriction on export of cotton yard regarding 10 e in exercise of the powers conferred ..... are not orders notifications issued under the provisions of the 1992 act and therefore the restrictions contained under those office memorandum policy circular being contrary to law are quashed and .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBeant Singh Vs. Union of India and Others
Court: Armed forces Tribunal AFT Principal Bench New Delhi
Decided on: May-02-2011
..... agra under whom the appellants unit was functioning had issued local instructions laying down certain restrictions on ges from procuring stores through dgsandd rate contract on 26 6 1996 cwe agra ..... functioning of some units in another station the army commander took action to withdraw the restrictions enabling the ges to procure stores through dgsandd rate contract as per the requirement on .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial