Restrict - Judgment Search Results

Registrar of Restrictive Trade Vs. United Breweries Ltd. and anr.

Court: Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission MRTPC

Reported in: (1989)65CompCas656NULL

..... the expertise and advice in marketing and distribution according to tbe registrar of restrictive trade agreements now designated as the director general investigation and registration hereinafter referred ..... balancing provision the respondents are expected to further satisfy the commission that the restriction is not unreasonable having regard to the balance between the circumstances as described .....

Motor Industries Co. Ltd. Vs. Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practic ...

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: ILR1986KAR2844

..... filed an application before the first respondent under regulation 66 of the monopolies and restrictive trade practices commission regulations 1972 hereinafter referred to as the regulation for separating ..... exercise of power arbitrary fit and proper for interference under articles monopolies and restrictive trade practices commission being a tribunal of limited jurisdiction not empowered to embark .....

Motor Industries Company Limited Vs. Monopolies and Restrictive Trade ...

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: [1990]67CompCas418(Kar)

..... filed an application before the fisrt respondent under regulation 66 of the monopolies and restrictive trade practice commission regulations 1974 hereinafter referred to as the regulation for separating the ..... equipment its spares and replacements or has caused imposition on customers unjustified costs or restrictions in the absence or necessary allegations it is highly hazardous for the commission to .....

Registrar of Restrictive Trade Vs. Kores India Limited

Court: Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission MRTPC

..... inasmuch as some of the dealers enjoy advantageous position and others do not this discrimination restricts or distorts competition amongst the two categories of dealers in the market besides this ..... about an adverse effect on competition under section 38 of the monopolies and restrictive trade practices act the restrictive trade practice is to be presumed to be prejudicial to public interest unless .....

Texas Vs. Mccullough

Court: US Supreme Court

..... describe exhaustively all of the possible circumstances in which a sentence increase could be justified restricting justifications for a sentence increase to only events that occurred subsequent to the original ..... have taken place after the original sentencing proceeding indeed the majority s insistence upon this restriction led to the refusal of justice white to subscribe to one part of the .....

City of Renton Vs. Playtime theatres

Court: US Supreme Court

..... such as bars massage parlors and adult bookstores are not subject to the same restrictions this selective treatment strongly suggests that renton was interested not in controlling the secondary ..... had complained about adult movie theaters and that other localities had adopted special zoning restrictions for such establishments these are not facts sufficient to justify the burdens the ordinance .....

Munro Vs. Socialist Workers

Court: US Supreme Court

..... promote the very first amendment values that are threatened by overly burdensome ballot access restrictions washington s voters are not denied freedom of association because they must channel their ..... function of empirical evidence a minor party is not impermissibly burdened by ballot access restrictions when a reasonably diligent independent candidate could be expected to satisfy the ballot access .....

Director-general of Vs. India Cements Limited

Court: Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission MRTPC

Reported in: (1987)62CompCas382NULL

..... applicant i e director general investigation and registration the respondent is indulging in the following restrictive trade practices as are ascertainable from the different terms of the agreement as well ..... namely 8 learned counsel for the respondent laid emphasis on the words relating to restrictive trade practices he submitted that these words clearly indicated that the trade practices which .....

Posadas De P.R. Assocs. Vs. Tourism Co.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... where legislative judgment not manifestly unreasonable appellant argues however that the challenged advertising restrictions are under inclusive because other kinds of gambling such as horse racing cockfighting ..... regulated other harmful products such as cigarettes alcoholic beverages and legalized prostitution by restricting advertising while i believe that puerto rico may not prohibit all casino .....

income-tax Officer Vs. A.C. Mathiah

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Madras

Reported in: (1986)16ITD28(Mad.)

..... the officer makes a fresh assessment it is doubtful whether the appellate assistant commissioner can restrict the power of officer while setting aside the assessment order itself and directing him to ..... commissioner to introduce into the assessment new sources as his power of enhancement should be restricted only to the income which was the subject matter of consideration for purposes of assessment .....