Restrict - Judgment Search Results

R.C. Sood and Co. (P) Ltd. Vs. Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practi ...

Court: Delhi

Reported in: [1996]86CompCas626(Delhi); 62(1996)DLT272; 1996(38)DRJ118

..... which he suffered huge loss the second respondent in the application alleged several instances of restrictive trade practices carried on by the petitioners however for the decision of the writ ..... not necessary that the commission should first inquire or investigate into the allegations of monopolistic restrictive and unfair trade practices carried on by any person or undertaking under sections 10 36 .....

Nagoor Hanifa Vs. State by Inspector of Police

Court: Chennai

Reported in: 1997CriLJ880

m karpagavinayagam j 1 this is a case of quadruple murder in which the appellant nagoor hanifa faced his trial...

Denver Area Ed. Telecommunications Consortium, Inc. Vs. Fcc

Court: US Supreme Court

..... legitimate objective of protecting children from exposure to patently offensive materials less restrictive means utilized by congress elsewhere to protect children from patently offensive sexual ..... altogether petitioners impliedly concede this point when they contend that the indecency restrictions are arbitrarily underinclusive because they do not affect the similarly indecent programming .....

Ballarpur Industries Ltd. Vs. Sinarmas and anr.

Court: Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission MRTPC

..... of his argument on the maintainability of the compensation proceedings stating that the monopolies and restrictive trade practices act 1969 applies only in respect of representations but not in respect of ..... a separate independent enquiry as envisaged in sections 37 and 36d of the monopolies and restrictive trade practices act in order to entertain compensation applications we agree with the said .....

Director-general (i and R) Vs. All India Organisation of

Court: Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission MRTPC

..... consider the said issue after our categorical satisfaction that the guidelines procedure agreement constitute restrictive trade practices and that they have been indulged in by respondent no 1 to ..... reformulation of the guidelines procedure agreement keeping in view the relevant provisions of the mrtp act and our observations above the reformulated system shall be produced before the director general .....

Gir Prasad Vs. Government of Uttar Pradesh and

Court: Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission MRTPC

..... controlled by the government government companies etc within the purview of the monopolies and restrictive trade practices act the notification merely excluded those undertakings owned or controlled by ..... by a private sector undertaking it is subject to surveillance under the monopolies and restrictive trade practices act likewise consequent on the government notification dated september 21 1991 .....

44 Liquormart, Inc. Vs. Rhode Island

Court: US Supreme Court

..... commercial information for paternalistic ends the state also cannot satisfy the requirement that its restriction on speech be no more extensive than necessary it is perfectly obvious that alternative ..... the court has recognized that the states inherent police powers provide ample authority to restrict the kind of bacchanalian revelries described in the larue opinion regardless of whether alcoholic .....

In Re: All India Organisation of

Court: Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission MRTPC

..... district level association namely jodhpur chemists association the second respondent above indulged in the restrictive trade practice of refusal to deal and discriminatory dealing by organising a boycott of ..... namely the third and second respondent respectively the director general has styled the said restrictive trade practice as a blatant interference with the working of the competitive forces and .....

Director-general (i and R) Vs. Bajaj Tempo Ltd.

Court: Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission MRTPC

..... and registration director general preferred under section 10 a iii of the monopolies and restrictive trade practices act 1969 indicting the respondent bajaj tempo limited pune of having indulged ..... in certain restrictive trade practices the director general in his application has stated that the respondent company .....

Natraj Chhabigrih, Sigra Vs. State of U.P. and Another

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: AIR1996All375

..... is neither to be found in any statute nor in the constitution self devised restrictions controlling ones dispositions insulating its possible outflow effecting others are all stroll towards ..... be discussed while dealing with petitioners iv preliminary objection 34 the court cannot give restrictive interpretation which erodes the judicial principle and imprisons and retards within it the fruits .....