Restrict - Judgment Search Results

Registrar of Restrictive Trade Vs. Tata Engineering and Locomotive

Court: Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission MRTPC

Reported in: (1976)46CompCas470NULL

satisfied because the trade practice can be accepted as a restrictive trade practice, only if it is shown that the trade

Registrar of Restrictive Trade Vs. Centron Industrial Alliance Pvt.

Court: Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission MRTPC

Reported in: (1978)48CompCas813NULL

inference that the arrangements did or were likely to limit, restrict or distort competition in the. industry as a whole. On

Registrar of Restrictive Trade Vs. Usha Sales Private Ltd.

Court: Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission MRTPC

his plea that the Clause in question related to any restrictive trade practice. The learned counsel for the Registrar very fairly

Registrar of Restrictive Trade Vs. Gramophone Co. of India Ltd.

Court: Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission MRTPC

Reported in: (1975)45CompCas666NULL

that a completed inquiry under Section 37(1) and findings on restrictive trade practices in such inquiry are conditions precedent to the

Registrar of Restrictive Trade Vs. United Breweries Ltd. and anr.

Court: Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission MRTPC

Reported in: (1989)65CompCas656NULL

5 and 12 of the agreement, exhibit A-1, relate to restrictive trade practices. These Clauses read : 2. With the object

Registrar of Restrictive Trade Vs. Allied Distributors and Company and

Court: Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission MRTPC

Brothers, Patna Glass House and the 786 dealers also contained restrictive trade practices.He has further contended that all the aforesaid restrictive

Registrar of Restrictive Trade Vs. Mysore Kirloskar Ltd. and anr.

Court: Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission MRTPC

Reported in: (1978)48CompCas837NULL

as to enlarge the scope of its efficacy, that the restrictive trade practices covered by the Commission's order were those envisaged

Registrar of Restrictive Trade Vs. Carona Sahu Ltd.

Court: Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission MRTPC

Reported in: (1976)46CompCas431NULL

para. 3 of the application under Section 10(a)(iii) relate to restrictive trade practices (2) Whether the said terms and conditions referred

Registrar of Restrictive Trade Vs. Rallis India Ltd. and anr.

Court: Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission MRTPC

a holding company and a subsidiary company cannot constitute a restrictive trade practice at all (ii) Whether an arrangement whereby a

Registrar of Restrictive Trade Vs. Kores India Limited

Court: Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission MRTPC

of Sub-section (1) of Section 38 of the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act. In this connection, in the first instance,